The effect of a lozenge combining prebiotic arginine and probiotics on caries increment in children during 10-12 months, a randomized clinical trial

Effect of Probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus plantarum on Caries and Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review

Caries and periodontitis are the most prevalent oral diseases worldwide. Major factors contributing to the development of these oral conditions include poor oral hygiene, dental biofilm formation, high carbohydrates diet, smoking, other systemic diseases, and genetic factors. Various preventive measures have been established to mitigate the risk of caries and periodontal disease development. The present review aims to discuss the role of the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus plantarum in the prevention and treatment of caries and periodontal diseases. The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. The search involved PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus and considered the PICO format. Studies were screened by two reviewers independently, and disagreements were solved by consensus with a third reviewer. Data extraction included details about the type of probiotics, strains, and purpose of administration. A total of 15 RCTs were included, of which just 1 was about tooth cavities. Overall, 87% of the included studies were good-quality papers regarding the Jadad Scale. Several studies agreed on the potential of probiotics L. rhamnosus and L. plantarum, both alone and combined, to prevent and improve clinical outcomes in caries and periodontal treatments, weaker evidence is provided for the microbiological benefit.

PRO-biotics? Are pre- and probiotics a valuable adjunct to fluoridated toothpaste in the battle against dental decay?

DESIGN

An investigator and participant masked, parallel-group randomised control trial examining the tooth surfaces of 288 children aged 5-9 years (n = 141 in the intervention group, n = 147 in the control group). Children in the intervention group were provided a daily lozenge containing 2% arginine (prebiotic), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei (probiotics). Children in the control group were provided with a placebo lozenge. Parents of participants were also provided with 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste and advised to brush their children's teeth twice daily. Clinical and radiographic examinations were undertaken at baseline and 10-12 months assessing caries activity, progression and regression at a tooth surface level. A modified ICDAS and radiographic scoring system were used to record presence and extent of carious lesions.

CASE SELECTION

Of 343 children who met the inclusion criteria, 21,888 tooth surfaces were examined in 288 low caries risk children aged between 5-9 years. Fifty-four participants withdrew consent (n = 31 for intervention group, n = 24 for control group) and 1 child was excluded as they were pre-cooperative for their dental examination. Participants were recruited from four municipalities in Denmark. To be eligible to participate, children had to be medically healthy, cooperative for clinical and radiographic examination, and able to ingest a daily lozenge.

DATA ANALYSIS

The primary outcome for this study was relative risk reduction (RRR) of caries activity, progression and regression. Although not present in this study, the main study broadly showed equality between the two groups in terms of their social demographic, dietary, oral health-related factors. The authors used modified Poisson regression to determine any surface level differences between the intervention and placebo groups. The threshold for statistical significance was set as follows: p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The authors describe that a power calculation was undertaken for the main study. However, none of the outcomes in this study were powered for.

RESULTS

19,950 tooth surfaces were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in change in caries activity between the two groups. There was a trend towards reduction in relative risk in the intervention group, with fewer active lesions (RRR: 15.3%; -6.0%, -32.4%), more caries regression (RRR: 0.3%; -0.4%, -1.0%) and reduced caries progression (RRR: 13.6%; -8.0%, -30.9%) observed than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a probiotic and prebiotic daily lozenges as an adjunct to 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste and oral hygiene instruction did not result in a significantly reduced relative risk of change in caries status compared to placebo. Further research over an increased intervention time with a higher caries risk population may identify potential advantages of adjunctive pre- and probiotics fluoride toothpaste in the prevention, arrest and regression of dental caries.

The efficacy of combined arginine and probiotics as an add-on to 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste to prevent and control dental caries in children - A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine how daily consumption of a lozenge combining arginine and two probiotic strains affects the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) in children regarding dental caries transitions and lesion activity at tooth surface level during 10-12 months.

METHODS

A total of 21,888 tooth surfaces in 288 children were examined. The intervention group (n = 141) received a lozenge containing 2% arginine, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, LGG® (DSM33156), and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, L. CASEI 431® (DSM33451). The placebo group (n = 147) received a placebo lozenge. Both groups received 1,450 ppm F- toothpaste. Primary canines, molars, and first permanent molars were examined clinically (ICDAS0-6) and radiographically (R0-6) at baseline and follow-up. Sealed, filled, and missing surfaces were also included. Caries activity was computed as a sum of each caries lesion's location, color, texture, cavitation, and gingival bleeding. RRRs were computed with cluster effect on surface level. ICH-GCP was followed, including external monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 19,950 surfaces were analyzed after excluding 1,938 tooth surfaces. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups. The RRRs showed less caries progression (13.6%, p = 0.20), more regression (0.3%, p = 0.44), and fewer active caries lesions (15.3%, p = 0.15) in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Daily consumption of a lozenge combining arginine and probiotics for 10-12 months given to 5-9-years-old children characterized being with low caries risk demonstrated a marked, though not statistically significant RRR for caries progression, regression, and number of active lesions in the intervention group compared to the placebo-group.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03928587).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Since all the RRRs were in favor of the intervention group and the PF of combined arginine and probiotics is high (81.6%) compared to fluoride toothpaste (24.9%) and arginine-fluoride toothpaste alone (19.6%) the combined pre-and probiotics approach may be a future additional tool regarding caries prevention and control.