Detection of mucous membrane pemphigoid autoantibodies by full-length BP180 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies inhibit the binding of laminins to α6β4 integrin in patients with pemphigoid and affect the gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies can be observed in some patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid. We have previously identified anti-α6β4 integrin extracellular domain autoantibodies together with anti-BP180 NC16A antibodies in a patient with DPP-4 inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid. However, the significance and impact of anti-α6β4 integrin antibodies are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize anti-α6β4 integrin extracellular domain autoantibodies in pemphigoid patients, to determine whether these antibodies inhibit laminin-α6β4 integrin binding and to observe their systemic effects.

METHODS

Anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies were analysed by staining cells expressing the extracellular region of α6β4 integrin with sera from 20 patients with pemphigoid. The anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies were characterized using different transfectants. The binding of laminins to α6β4 integrin was studied using cells expressing the activated conformation of α6β4 integrin and the inhibitory effect of the autoantibodies on the binding of laminins to α6β4 integrin was tested. Trends in antibody titres and clinical symptoms were quantified and analysed.

RESULTS

IgG autoantibodies against the extracellular domain of anti-α6β4 integrin were found in some patients with pemphigoid. Laminin binding to α6β4 integrin was observed in the active conformation of α6β4 integrin, and serum from a patient with a high titre of anti-α6β4 integrin antibodies inhibited the binding of both laminin-511 and laminin-332 to α6β4 integrin. α6β4 integrin is expressed on the basement membrane of both skin and small intestine, and exfoliation was observed in the patient's epidermis and small intestinal epithelium. A reduction in the titre of the anti-α6β4 integrin antibody was associated with improvement in both skin and gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the presence of anti-α6β4 integrin extracellular domain-specific autoantibodies in some patients with pemphigoid. In addition, these autoantibodies showed inhibitory activity on α6β4 integrin-laminin binding. Anti-α6β4 integrin antibodies can affect the gastrointestinal tract as well as the skin and oral mucosa.

Native autoantigen complex detects pemphigoid autoantibodies

Pemphigoid diseases are a group of autoimmune disorders characterized by subepidermal blistering in the skin and mucosa. Among them, mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) autoantibodies are characterized by targeting multiple molecules in the hemidesmosomes, including collagen XVII, laminin-332, and integrin a6/β4. Traditionally, recombinant proteins of the autoantigens have been employed to identify circulating autoantibodies by immune assays. However, developing an efficient detection system for MMP autoantibodies has been challenging because the autoantibodies have heterogeneous profiles and the antibody titers are typically low. In this study, we introduce an ELISA that takes advantage of a native autoantigen complex rather than simple recombinant proteins. We generated HaCaT keratinocytes with a DDDDK-tag knocked in at the COL17A1 locus by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Immunoprecipitation using the DDDDK-tag isolated a native complex that contained full-length and processed collagen XVII and integrin α6/β4. Then, we used the complex proteins to prepare an ELISA system and enrolled 55 MMP cases to validate its diagnostic performance. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA for detecting MMP autoantibodies were 70.9% and 86.7%, respectively, far superior to those of conventional assays. In autoimmune diseases such as MMP, in which autoantibodies target various molecules, isolating the antigen-protein complexes can help establish a diagnostic system.

BP180NC16a autoantibody positivity may predict low-risk mucous membrane pemphigoid

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to explore the clinical characteristics of BP180NC16a autoantibody-positive mucous membrane pemphigoid.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data from 22 patients were collected by retrospective chart review. For the detection of BP180NC16a autoantibody, a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay kit was used. The patients were classified into the following clinical phenotypes: low-risk patients who had lesions only in the oral mucosa or in the oral mucosa and skin and high-risk patients who had lesions in the oral mucosa and any of the following sites: the eyes, upper respiratory tract, or esophagus.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 22 patients (50%) were BP180NC16a-positive at the time of diagnosis. All the positive patients were in the low-risk group. There was a significant difference in the incidence of low-risk mucous membrane pemphigoid between BP180NC16a autoantibody-positive and BP180NC16a autoantibody-negative patients (P = 0.004). Patients' age, disease duration, and oral disease activity scores were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

BP180NC16a reactivity was associated with the clinical phenotype characterized by only oral mucosal lesions or combined oral mucosal and skin lesions. BP180NC16a autoantibody might be useful as a serum marker to predict low-risk mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a clinically and immunopathologically heterogenous disease with an incidence of about 2/million inhabitants/year in central Europe. Pemphigoid diseases are characterized by autoantibodies against structural proteins of the epidermis and/or surface-close epithelia. MMP has been defined as pemphigoid disease with predominant mucosal lesions. Most frequently, the oral cavity and the conjunctivae are affected. Lesions outside the mouth tend to heal with scarring leading to visual impairment and finally blindness, as well as, more rarely, impairment of breathing and food intake. Autoantibodies target BP180 (collagen type XVII), laminin 332, BP230 (nearly always in conjunction with other antigens), and type VII collagen in about 75%, 10-20%, 10-30%, and <5% of MMP patients, respectively. While the main autoantibody isotype is IgG, additional, and less frequently, exclusive IgA autoantibodies can be detected in the majority of patients. Assaying for anti-laminin 332 reactivity is pivotal, since in about a quarter of patients with anti-laminin 332 MMP, a malignancy, mainly solid cancers, is associated. The pathophysiology of MMP is yet incompletely understood. A recent mouse model of anti-laminin 332 MMP replicating characteristic clinical and immunopathological findings of the human disease may be helpful to close this knowledge gap. Diagnosis is established by the clinical picture with predominant mucosal lesions and visualization of tissue-bound anti-basement membrane zone antibodies by direct immunofluorescence microscopy. In recent S3 guidelines initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, the clinical spectrum and diagnostic strategies are detailed. In addition, treatment regimens for different clinical situations including patients with exclusive oral or ocular involvement are outlined. Future studies are needed to better understand the clinal complexity and associations as well as to establish widely available diagnostic assays and evidence-based therapeutic strategies.

Evaluation of BP180-NC16A ELISA in exclusive oral pemphigoid diagnosis. A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Aims of this study were to test the efficacy of anti-BP180-NC160 ELISA in the diagnosis of oral pemphigoid compared to the gold standard, represented by direct immunofluorescence and pathological examination, to correlate the antibody titers with the severity of the disease and the demographical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a suspect of oral pemphigoid were enrolled and underwent biopsy and sera collection both, in order to perform histopathological examination, direct immunofluorescence and ELISA. The test outcomes were compared, and ELISA sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

ELISA showed good specificity (83.3%), while sensitivity was only 50%. A moderate correlation between antibody titers and disease severity was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucomembranous Pemphigoid is an autoimmune autoantibody-mediated blistering disease, often affecting exclusively the oral mucosa. Currently, the biopsy is required to diagnose this disease, but serological tests are also commonly employed during clinical practice as adjunctive tools. BP180-NC160 ELISA should be considered an ancillary diagnostic test in course of oral pemphigoid; direct immunofluorescence + histologic examination remains the diagnostic gold standard.

A service evaluation of the diagnostic testing for mucous membrane pemphigoid in a UK oral medicine unit

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an uncommon bullous disease typically involving the oral cavity. The most commonly used laboratory test for the diagnosis of MMP is direct immunofluorescence (DIF) on fresh perilesional tissue; however, the sensitivity of this test may be hampered by technical difficulties. Immune-serological investigations can also be employed to render a diagnosis. The purpose of this paper was to present an evaluation of diagnostic testing for MMP within an Oral Medicine Unit in UK.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the medical records was undertaken for patients who had undergone biopsy and DIF testing from January 2016 to December 2018. Parameters analysed included clinical presentation, histopathological features, DIF, salt-split skin indirect immunofluorescence, ELISA anti-BP180 and BP 230 and HLA-DQB1*03:01 findings.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (23 females and 7 males, mean age 66.8 years old) were diagnosed with MMP through a combination of histopathology and serological testing. Sixteen patients (53%) were DIF positive, whereas in 14 (47%), MMP diagnosis was achieved using immune-serologic tests. HLA DQB1*03:01 status was undertaken in 15 DIF-positive and 12 DIF-negative patients, and HLA DQB1*03:01 was found in 73% and 58% of the cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This service evaluation has shown that when DIF is informative, it remains the gold standard technique for diagnosis of MMP. However, we have also highlighted the value of serological testing for increasing diagnostic yield for patients with suspected MMP and the potential for HLA DQB1*03:01 as an adjunctive test for the evaluation of MMP.

Oral Lesions in Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: An Overview of Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Algorithm

Autoimmune bullous diseases are a group of chronic inflammatory disorders caused by autoantibodies targeted against structural proteins of the desmosomal and hemidesmosomal plaques in the skin and mucosa, leading to intra-epithelial or subepithelial blistering. The oral mucosa is frequently affected in these diseases, in particular, in mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. The clinical symptoms are heterogeneous and may present with erythema, blisters, erosions, and ulcers localized anywhere on the oral mucosa, and lead to severe complaints for the patients including pain, dysphagia, and foetor. Therefore, a quick and proper diagnosis with adequate treatment is needed. Clinical presentations of autoimmune bullous diseases often overlap and diagnosis cannot be made based on clinical features alone. Immunodiagnostic tests are of great importance in differentiating between the different diseases. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy shows depositions of autoantibodies along the epithelial basement membrane zone in mucous membrane pemphigoid subtypes, or depositions on the epithelial cell surface in pemphigus variants. Additional immunoserological tests are useful to discriminate between the different subtypes of pemphigoid, and are essential to differentiate between pemphigus and paraneoplastic pemphigus. This review gives an overview of the clinical characteristics of oral lesions and the diagnostic procedures in autoimmune blistering diseases, and provides a diagnostic algorithm for daily practice.

Immunological methods for the diagnosis of oral mucosal diseases

Immunological methods, which have been widely used in autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) of the oral mucosa, can also be adopted as auxiliary diagnostic tools in oral lichen planus (OLP) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). AIBDs, characterized by autoantibodies against structural proteins of keratinocytes or the basement membrane zone, clinically present as blisters and erosions of the oral mucosa. When atypical lesions occur, OLP or DLE may be confused with AIBDs. The improvement of diagnostic accuracy is necessary due to the significant differences in treatment and prognosis among these diseases. A variety of immunological methods are used for qualitative and quantitative detection of target antigens and autoantibodies. These methods can evaluate efficacy of treatment, monitor diseases and guide treatment decisions. In this review, we discuss the application of immunofluorescence, biochemical tests, and protein microarrays for AIBDs, OLP and DLE, as well as the differential diagnostic methods using immunological tests.

The Diagnosis and Blistering Mechanisms of Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a mucous membrane-dominated autoimmune subepithelial blistering disease that is caused by autoantibodies against various autoantigens in basement membrane zone (BMZ) proteins, including collagen XVII (COL17). Clinicians face diagnostic problems in detecting circulating antibodies and targeted antigens in MMP. The diagnostic difficulties are mainly attributed to the low titers of MMP autoantibodies in sera and to heterogeneous autoantigens. Additionally, no unanimous diagnostic criteria have been drawn for MMP, which can result in delayed diagnoses or misdiagnoses. This review aims to integrate and present currently available data to clarify diagnostic strategies and to present diagnostic criteria for MMP. The ultimate blistering mechanism in MMP has not been elucidated, and such mechanism is especially obscure in COL17-type MMP. In bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, some patients show oral lesion as well as predominant skin lesions. However, there is no fundamental explanation for the onset of oral lesions in BP. This article summarizes innovative research perspectives on the pathogenesis of oral lesions in pemphigoid. Finally, we propose a potential pathogenesis for COL17-type MMP.

Detection of IgE autoantibodies in mucous membrane pemphigoid and their association with disease severity

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by scarring lesions at mucosal sites. Although the pathogenic role of specific IgG and/or IgA has been already demonstrated and the detection of these immunoglobulins is a criterion in the diagnosis of MMP, little is known about IgE role in this disease. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to assess the presence of circulating and tissue bound IgE in patients with MMP and their possible correlations with clinical presentation and disease course.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 29 patients affected by MMP, recruited from a single center. Direct and indirect immunofluorescence studies were assessed to analyze the presence of specific IgE directed against the basal membrane zone. For each patient, fluorescence data were compared to clinical features.

RESULTS

Linear deposits of C3, IgG and IgA were present in 86.2%, 62% and 37.9% of cases respectively, while IgE linear deposits were detected in 17 out of 29 patients (58.6%) including one case with isolated IgE positivity. Circulating IgE and IgA anti-BMZ were present in 7 (24.1%) and 5 (17.2%) patients, respectively. Both the presence of circulating IgA and of tissue bound IgE deposits correlated with disease activity index (P<0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated the presence of IgE autoantibodies in MMP, particularly in more severe cases. Thus, IgE detection may represent an additional useful diagnostic tool in this disease.

Direct Immunofluorescence Using Non-Lesional Buccal Mucosa in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a rare organ-specific autoimmune subepithelial blistering disease with predominantly mucosal erosions, most frequently affecting the gingiva. Erosions in the oral cavity usually result in markedly decreased quality of life. The major autoantigens are BP180 and laminin332, which are components of basement membrane proteins in the skin and mucosa. Diagnosis is usually difficult due to histological destruction of the tissue and low autoantibody titers. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) using non-lesional buccal mucosa in seven cases of MMP. In all seven patients, gingival lesions were clinically observed, and in one of the seven patients, buccal lesions were also clinically observed. First, we performed DIF to detect tissue-bound autoantibodies and complement. DIF from non-lesional buccal mucosa revealed linear deposits of IgG and C3 at the basement membrane zone in all cases. To detect autoantibodies, indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), BP180-NC16A ELISA and immunoblotting were performed. Surprisingly, circulating autoantibodies were unable to be detected in any of the cases by ELISA, IIF, or immunoblotting. Furthermore, histological separation was observed in one patient. In conclusion, DIF using non-lesional buccal mucosa was found to be superior to histological and serological tests for diagnosing mucous membrane pemphigoid. The procedure is technically easy and has high diagnostic value.