Glycemic control with regular versus lispro insulin sliding scales in hospitalized Type 2 diabetics

Sliding scale insulin for non-critically ill hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion, function, or both. Hyperglycaemia in non-critically ill hospitalised people is associated with poor clinical outcomes (infections, prolonged hospital stay, poor wound healing, higher morbidity and mortality). In the hospital setting people diagnosed with diabetes receive insulin therapy as part of their treatment in order to achieve metabolic control. However, insulin therapy can be provided by different strategies (sliding scale insulin (SSI), basal-bolus insulin, and other modalities). Sliding scale insulin is currently the most commonly used method, however there is uncertainty about which strategy provides the best patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of SSI for non-critically ill hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified eligible trials by searching MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library. We searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov trial registers. The date of the last search for all databases was December 2017. We also examined reference lists of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, and contacted trial authors.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing SSI with other strategies for glycaemic control in non-critically ill hospitalised adult participants of any sex with diabetes mellitus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed trials for risk of bias, and evaluated the overall certainty of evidence utilising the GRADE instrument. We synthesised data using a random-effects model meta-analysis with 95% prediction intervals, if possible, or descriptive analysis, as appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 720 records screened, we included eight trials that randomised 1048 participants with type 2 diabetes (387 SSI participants and 615 participants in comparator groups were available for final analysis). We included non-critically ill medical and surgical adults with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The mean follow-up time was measured by the mean length of hospital stay and ranged between five and 24 days. The mean age of participants was 44.5 years to 71 years.Overall, we judged the risk of bias on the trial level as unclear for selection bias, high for outcome-related performance and detection bias with regard to hypoglycaemic episodes, other adverse events, and mean glucose levels, and low for all-cause mortality and length of hospital stay. Attrition bias was low for all outcome measures.Six trials compared SSI with a basal-bolus insulin scheme, three of which investigating 64% of all participants in this category also applying an SSI approach in the bolus comparator part. One trial had a basal insulin-only comparator arm, and the remaining trial used continuous insulin infusion as the comparator. For our main comparison of SSI versus basal-bolus insulin, the results were as follows. Four trials reported mortality data. One out of 268 participants in the SSI group (0.3%) compared with two out of 334 participants in the basal-bolus group (0.6%) died (low-certainty evidence). Severe hypoglycaemic episodes, defined as blood glucose levels below 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L), showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 1.00; P = 0.05; 5 trials; 667 participants; very low-certainty evidence. The 95% prediction interval ranged between 0.02 and 2.57. All nine severe hypoglycaemic episodes were observed among the 369 participants on basal-bolus insulin (2.4%). The mean length of hospital stay was 0.5 days longer for the SSI group, 95% CI -0.5 to 1.4; P = 0.32; 6 trials; 717 participants; very low-certainty evidence. The 95% prediction interval ranged between -1.7 days and 2.7 days. Adverse events other than hypoglycaemic episodes, such as postoperative infections, showed a RR of 1.16, 95% CI 0.25 to 5.37; P = 0.85; 3 trials; 481 participants; very low-certainty evidence. The mean blood glucose levels ranged across basal-bolus groups from 156 mg/dL (8.7 mmol/L) to 221 mg/dL (12.3 mmol/L). The mean blood glucose level in the SSI groups was 14.8 mg/dL (0.8 mmol/L) higher (95% CI 7.8 (0.4) to 21.8 (1.2); P < 0.001; 6 trials; 717 participants; low-certainty evidence). The 95% prediction interval ranged between -3.6 mg/dL (-0.2 mmol/L) and 33.2 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L). No trial reported on diabetes-related mortality or socioeconomic effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain which insulin strategy (SSI or basal-bolus insulin) is best for non-critically hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus. A basal-bolus insulin strategy in these patients might result in better short-term glycaemic control but could increase the risk for severe hypoglycaemic episodes. The certainty of the body of evidence comparing SSI with basal-bolus insulin was low to very low and needs to be improved by adequately performed, well-powered RCTs in different hospital environments with well-educated medical staff using identical short-acting insulins in both intervention and comparator arms to compare the rigid SSI approach with flexible insulin application strategies.

Comparative efficacy and safety of insulin analogs in hospitalized adults

PURPOSE

The comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rapid and long-acting insulin analogs compared with regular or neutral protamine Hagedorn nonanalog insulins or with oral antidiabetic agents in hospitalized adults were evaluated.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared the effects of rapid-acting, long-acting, or mixed insulin analogs with short- or intermediate-acting insulin or any other oral antidiabetic medication.

RESULTS

Twenty-three primary studies were included in the review. Rapid-acting analogs and basal-bolus analog regimens were found to reduce the duration of hospital stay by approximately one day compared with regular insulin and basal-bolus nonanalog regimens. One large cohort study found an adjusted 48% relative risk reduction in mortality with rapid-acting analogs versus regular insulin in a heterogeneous hospitalized hyperglycemic population. A randomized controlled trial found a significant reduction in postoperative complications with basal-bolus analogs compared with basal-bolus nonanalog insulin. When compared with regular sliding-scale insulin (SSI), fixed-dose insulin glargine with or without insulin glulisine was found to reduce the blood glucose concentration in patients with type 2 diabetes and reduce postoperative complications in surgical patients with diabetes. The quality of evidence was primarily very low or low for most outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A systematic literature review revealed a very low or low quality of evidence, suggesting that, compared with nonanalog regimens, rapid-acting insulin analogs reduce the duration of hospital stay and mortality rates and that basal- bolus analog regimens may reduce the duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications. There is also a low quality of evidence to suggest that a fixed-dose analog regimen of insulin glargine with or without insulin glulisine is more effective than regular SSI for reducing blood glucose concentrations and postoperative complications.

Intensive versus intermediate glucose control in surgical intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVE

The optimal perioperative blood glucose range to improve surgical site infection (SSI) in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients remains unclear. We sought to determine whether the incidence of SSI is reduced by perioperative intensive insulin therapy (IT).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive perioperative intensive IT, with a target blood glucose range of 4.4-6.1 mmol/L, or intermediate IT, with a target blood glucose range of 7.7-10.0 mmol/L in the surgical ICU. We defined the primary end point as the incidence of SSI.

RESULTS

Study participants were randomly assigned to glucose control with one of two target ranges: for 225 patients in the intermediate IT group or for 222 patients in the intensive IT group, respectively. No patients in either group became hypoglycemic (<4.4 mmol/L) during their stay in the surgical ICU. In our series, the rate of SSI after hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery was 6.7%. Patients in the intensive IT group, compared with the intermediate IT group, had fewer postoperative SSIs (9.8% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.028) and a lower incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic resection (P = 0.040). The length of hospitalization required for patients in the intensive IT group was significantly shorter than that in the intermediate IT group (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that intensive IT decreased the incidence of SSI among patients who underwent hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: a blood glucose target of 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L resulted in lower rate of SSI than did a target of 7.7-10.0 mmol/L.

Anaesthetic perioperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a significant and unresolved therapeutic challenge. Currently, the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection. Pancreatic surgery represents a technically demanding major abdominal procedure that can occasionally lead to a number of pathophysiological alterations resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Systemic, rather than surgical complications, cause the majority of deaths. Because patients are increasingly referred to surgery with at advanced ages and because pancreatic surgery is extremely complex, anaesthesiologists and surgeons play a crucial role in preoperative evaluations and diagnoses for surgical intervention. The anaesthetist plays a key role in perioperative management and can significantly influence patient outcome. To optimise overall care, patients should be appropriately referred to tertiary centres, where multidisciplinary teams (surgical, medical, radiation oncologists, gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists and anaesthetists) work together and where close cooperation between surgeons and anaesthesiologists promotes the safe performance of major gastrointestinal surgeries with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. In this review, we sought to provide simple daily recommendations to the clinicians who manage pancreatic surgery patients to make their work easier and suggest a joint approach between surgeons and anaesthesiologists in daily decision making.

Hospital Strategies for Insulin Therapy with Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs

This article presents strategies on how to meet the challenges presented by the use of insulin in the hospital setting and describes trends seen in current hospital practice. Insulin provides the greatest flexibility in the hospital setting to achieve optimal blood glycemic control in patients with known type 2 diabetes, thereby reducing complications and death. Important challenges include implementing protocols for use of subcutaneous insulin injection (including optimal use of insulin pens), conversion from continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intravenous infusion to subcutaneous administration by multiple injections, and dosing of insulin in patients receiving corticosteroids. One important trend is a move away from the use of sliding-scale insulin to the use of correction-dose insulin as an adjunct to basal/bolus insulin. In this approach, insulin treatment is closely tailored to changing levels of glycemia, and a protocol is put in place for administration of a correction dose of rapid-acting insulin in response to a glycemic excursion. Insulin analogs can more closely mimic physiological insulin profiles than regular insulin, and rapid-acting analogs are invaluable agents as correction insulin administered by pump or in transition to multiple daily injections and as part of basal/bolus therapy. Good glycemic control can improve outcomes of hospital patients in several ways, including facilitating more rapid recovery from infections, shortening intensive care stays, and minimizing costs. Strategies employed to meet the challenges of insulin use in the hospital setting include the increasing use of continuous glucose monitoring systems and the development of insulin dosing algorithms.

Frequently repeated glucose measurements overestimate the incidence of inpatient hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine if frequently repeated glucose measurements mandated by an inpatient protocol led to falsely elevated reported rates of both hypo- and hyperglycemia.

METHODS

In our academic medical center, a mandatory standardized subcutaneous insulin order form and protocol was implemented in May 2006. We analyzed point-of-care blood glucose (BG) measurements collected on all medical/surgical wards during the month of August in both 2005 and 2006 by all BGs measured, by patient admission, and by monitored patient-day. We then repeated all analyses using an algorithm that excluded BG values if another BG was measured less than 5 minutes later or 5-60 minutes earlier.

RESULTS

In 2005 versus 2006, there were 7034 versus 8016 glucoses measured in 397 versus 389 patients over 1704 versus 1710 patient days, respectively. Analyses based on patient-day balanced differences in BG measurement frequency and patient length of stay. In both years, failure to exclude repeat values overestimated both the proportion of patient days with hypoglycemia (3.5% versus 1.8% in 2005, p = .003; 2.6% versus 1.3% in 2006, p = .007) and severe hyperglycemia (9.3% versus 7.4% in 2005, p = .09; 7.7% versus 5.9% in 2006, p = .08). Mean, median, and proportion of patient-day means within our target range (80-150 mg/dl) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Glucometric reports should exclude repeated BG measurements from a single clinical episode of hypo- or hyperglycemia in order to accurately reflect inpatient glycemic control.

Perioperative insulin therapy using a closed-loop artificial endocrine pancreas after hepatic resection

Postoperative hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients, even in those without a prior history of diabetes mellitus. It is well known that hyperglycemia induced by surgical stress often results in dysregulation of liver metabolism and immune function, impairing postoperative recovery. Current evidence suggests that maintaining normoglycemia postoperatively improves surgical outcome and reduces the mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients. On the basis of these observations, several large randomized controlled studies were designed to evaluate the benefit of postoperative tight glycemic control with intensive insulin therapy. However, intensive insulin therapy carries the risk of hypoglycemia, which is linked to serious neurological events. Recently, we demonstrated that perioperative tight glycemic control in surgical patients could be achieved safely using a closed-loop glycemic control system and that this decreased both the incidence of infection at the site of the surgical incision, without the appearance of hypoglycemia, and actual hospital costs. Here, we review the benefits and requirements of perioperative intensive insulin therapy using a closed-loop artificial endocrine pancreas system in hepatectomized patients. This novel intensive insulin therapy is safe and effectively improves surgical outcome after hepatic resection.

Effect of intensive insulin therapy using a closed-loop glycemic control system in hepatic resection patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients in surgical intensive care units. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of IIT using a closed-loop system in hepatectomized patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive IIT using a closed-loop system: an artificial pancreas (AP group) or conventional insulin therapy using the sliding-scale method (SS group). RESULTS The incidence of surgical-site infection in the AP group was significantly lower than that in the SS group. The length of hospitalization required for patients in the AP group was significantly shorter than that in the SS group. CONCLUSIONS Total hospital costs for patients in the AP group were significantly lower than for patients in the SS group. IIT using a closed-loop system maintained near-normoglycemia and contributed to a reduction in the incidence of SSI and total hospital costs due to shortened hospitalization.

Risk factors and predictors for surgical site infection after hepatic resection

Strict control of blood glucose levels with insulin in a surgical intensive care unit reduces postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and the predictors for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in a consecutive series of hepatectomised cases in a single institution. The association between SSI and various clinical parameters was investigated in 152 patients who underwent hepatic resection at Kochi Medical School from January 2000 through March 2007. The incidence of SSI in these patients was 14.5%. Multivariate analysis identified four independent parameters correlating with the occurrence of SSI: (i) body mass index >23.6 kg/m(2); (ii) estimated blood volume loss >810 mL; (iii) presence of postoperative bile leakage of organ/space SSI; and (iv) use of the sliding scale method for postoperative glucose control. There was no observed SSI after liver resection in the group whose postoperative blood glucose levels were controlled by an artificial pancreas. This study reveals that lack of postoperative glycaemic control is associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative infectious complications and longer hospitalisation. Obesity and the level of intraoperative estimated blood loss and bile leakage after hepatic resection are also risk factors with predictive value for SSI. Artificial pancreas is a safe and beneficial device to perform postoperative strict glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia for patients who undergo hepatic resection for liver diseases.

Continuous post-operative blood glucose monitoring and control using a closed-loop system in patients undergoing hepatic resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hyperglycemia induced by surgical stress often causes the dysregulation of liver metabolism and immune function resulting in impaired post-operative recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a closed-loop system providing continuous monitoring and strict control of post-operative blood glucose in patients after hepatic resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 19 patients who underwent hepatic resection for primary liver tumor between August and December 2006 were enrolled in the study. Following surgery, blood glucose was continuously monitored by the STG-22 closed-loop system. Glucose levels were controlled using either a manual injection of insulin according to the commonly used sliding scale (manual insulin group, n = 9) or a programmed infusion of insulin determined by the control algorithm of the STG-22 (programmed insulin group, n = 10). The total amount of insulin used in the first 16 h following hepatic resection in the two groups was measured.

RESULTS

In the manual insulin group, post-operative blood glucose rose initially and reached a plateau of approximately 250 mg/dl between 4 h and 7 h post-hepatectomy and then returned towards normal levels by 16 h. In the programmed insulin group, blood glucose was steadily lowered, reaching the target zone (90-110 mg/dl) by 12 h post-surgery. The total amount of insulin administered per patient during the first 16 h post-surgery was significantly higher in the programmed insulin group (183 +/- 188 IU) than in the manual insulin group (8 +/- 7 IU; P < 0.001). No hypoglycemia was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative hyperglycemia was observed for up to 16 h in hepatectomized patients. In this post-operative hyperglycemic state, the STG-22 closed-loop system safely and quickly achieved glycemic control, indicating its clinical value in the post-operative management of hepatectomized patients.

Diabetes: the latest trends in glycemic control

The increasing pervasiveness of diabetes mellitus on a global stage has been well documented. Many groundbreaking studies have detailed the consequences of inadequate glycemic control, but only recently have data supported evidence that demonstrates benefits in the acute setting. Consensus is lacking with regard to how to achieve glycemic control in the hospital setting. This article discusses glycemic control, with special emphasis on the perioperative patient. Emerging therapeutic treatments and less frequently encountered protocols such as insulin pump management and insulin infusion are considered.