Anaphylactic shock with an ultrasound contrast agent

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the evaluation of Crohn disease activity in children: comparison with histopathology

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) of the bowel wall has been suggested as an alternative imaging modality for the follow-up of children with Crohn disease.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US in the estimation of Crohn disease activity in children with histopathology as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 24 children with Crohn disease confirmed on histopathology, disease activity was evaluated on 40 bowel segments using US score and subjective and quantitative contrast-enhanced US evaluation. Contrast-enhanced US evaluation included enhancement pattern analysis with a graphic representation of log time-intensity curve and calculation of kinetic parameters with the definition of thresholds for disease activity, as determined by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of US with colour Doppler imaging and subjective and quantitative contrast-enhanced US were calculated.

RESULTS

Moderate or severe inflammation was identified in 18 segments and remission or mild inflammation was identified in 22 segments on histopathology. The quantitative contrast-enhanced US, namely the peak enhancement value, had 72.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.5-90.3), 100% specificity (95% CI 84.6-100.0) and 87.5% diagnostic accuracy (95% CI 73.2-95.8) in predicting moderate or severe grade inflammation at histopathology. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of subjective contrast-enhanced US were 77.8% (95% CI 52.4-93.6), 77.3% (95% CI 54.6-92.2) and 77.5% (95% CI 61.6-89.2), respectively, and of US with colour Doppler imaging were 55.6% (95% CI 30.8-78.5), 86.4% (95% CI 65.1-79.1) and 72.5% (95% CI 56.1-85.4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative contrast-enhanced US has the potential of becoming a complementary method in the evaluation of Crohn disease activity in children. Fibrosis may affect peak enhancement results and underestimate inflammatory activity.

Human Clinical Relevance of the Porcine Model of Pseudoallergic Infusion Reactions

Pigs provide a highly sensitive animal model for pseudoallergic infusion reactions, which are mild-to-severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that arise following intravenous administration of certain nanoparticulate drugs (nanomedicines) and other macromolecular structures. This model has been used in research for three decades and was also proposed by regulatory bodies for preclinical assessment of the risk of HSRs in the clinical stages of nano-drug development. However, there are views challenging the human relevance of the model and its utility in preclinical safety evaluation of nanomedicines. The argument challenging the model refers to the “global response” of pulmonary intravascular macrophages (PIM cells) in the lung of pigs, preventing the distinction of reactogenic from non-reactogenic particles, therefore overestimating the risk of HSRs relative to its occurrence in the normal human population. The goal of this review is to present the large body of experimental and clinical evidence negating the “global response” claim, while also showing the concordance of symptoms caused by different reactogenic nanoparticles in pigs and hypersensitive man. Contrary to the model’s demotion, we propose that the above features, together with the high reproducibility of quantifiable physiological endpoints, validate the porcine “complement activation-related pseudoallergy” (CARPA) model for safety evaluations. However, it needs to be kept in mind that the model is a disease model in the context of hypersensitivity to certain nanomedicines. Rather than toxicity screening, its main purpose is specific identification of HSR hazard, also enabling studies on the mechanism and mitigation of potentially serious HSRs.