Evidence-based clinical decision making for the management of patients with periodontal osseous defect after impacted third molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of immediate vs. delayed guided tissue regeneration in Infrabony defect of second molars after adjacent third molar extraction: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The distal aspect of the second molar (d-M2) often exhibits infrabony defects due to the adjacent third molar. Although the defects can be treated by guided tissue regeneration (GTR) after removing the third molar, the optimal timing remains uncertain following third molar removal in clinical decision-making. This study aimed to compare delayed and immediate GTR treatments to assist in clinical decision-making.

METHODS

D-M2 infrabony defects with a minimum 1-year follow-up were collected and divided into three groups: Immediate GTR group, which underwent third molar extraction and received GTR simultaneously; Delayed GTR group, which underwent delayed GTR at least 3 months after third molar extraction; and Control group, which underwent only scaling and root planing during third molar extraction. The clinical and radiographic parameters related to the infrabony defect before GTR and post-surgery were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Dunn's test or the Bonferroni test for pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 109 d-M2 infrabony defects were assessed. No significant differences were found between the two GTR groups, although both of them showed significant reductions in infrabony defect depth: the immediate GTR group (2.77 ± 1.97 mm vs. 0.68 ± 1.03 mm, p < 0.001) and the delayed GTR group (2.98 ± 1.08 mm vs. 0.68 ± 1.03 mm, p < 0.001) compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

GTR can effectively improve d-M2 infrabony defects when the third molar is removed, whether simultaneously or delayed. Patients may experience less discomfort with immediate GTR treatment as it requires only one surgery.

Surgical difficulty and postoperative course of the third molar extraction under general anesthesia: An intervention trial

BACKGROUND

Third molar extractions are one of the most common surgical procedures in the area of ​​stomatology. However, we know that even if they are minor surgeries, they can cause a postoperative period with local and systemic repercussions. Thus, the aim of this intervention trial is to determine the relationship between clinical parameters (pain, inflammation and trismus) and serum parameters (C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6 and fibrinogen) that are modified in the first postoperative week, and the appearance of complications after extraction with general anesthesia, using the Pederson scale.

METHODS

The research question was: Can postoperative discomfort after third molar extraction under general anesthesia be predicted using Pederson scale? An interventional trial was carried out of third molar extractions under general anesthesia in Dr. Peset University Hospital. Patient selection was performed randomized using MS Excel. Then were divided into two groups (n = 126): group A (2 complex extractions) and group B (4 extractions: 2 simple and 2 complex). All parameters were collected at the surgery and 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The clinical postoperative parameters showed significant differences in relation to surgical difficulty. In summary, the degree of surgical difficulty can be predicted with the Pederson scale before extracting mandibular third molars. CRP and fibrinogen levels increase significantly with the degree of surgical difficulty.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed in all the intraoperative parameters according to surgical difficulty as assessed by the Pederson scale. Therefore, this scale was a good indicator to estimate the patient's postoperative period.

Evaluation of deproteinised bovine bone matrix combined with absorbable biofilm for the preservation of extraction sites of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth

BACKGROUND

Bone defects and deep periodontal pockets often exist distal to the second molar after mandibular third molar extraction, seriously threatening the periodontal health of the second molar.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of socket preservation with bone substitute materials on alveolar bone resorption and prevention of the distal periodontal defect of the adjacent tooth after mandibular impacted third molar extraction compared with natural healing.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with mandibular impacted teeth, treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020, were randomly divided into the control and experimental groups. The experimental group underwent minimally invasive tooth extraction and socket preservation using the deproteinised bovine bone mineral, Bio-Oss and the bioabsorbable collagen membrane, Bio-Gide. The control group healed naturally after minimally invasive tooth extraction. The alveolar ridge dimension of the extraction sites, the probing depth, tooth mobility and gingival index on the distal aspect of the mandibular second molars were examined and recorded before and six months after the operations.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in the alveolar bone width (P< 0.05) and height (P< 0.05) before and after surgery. The probing depth of the extraction sites in both groups was reduced.

CONCLUSION

Using Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide to preserve extraction sites of impacted teeth can promote recovery more effectively than natural healing on the height of the distal alveolar bone and the width of the alveolar crest of the second molar and thus improve the periodontal status of the adjacent second molar.

Marginal and Para-Marginal Technique in Late Germectomy of Lower Third Molars

INTRODUCTION

Third molar surgery can cause post-operative complications to the patient due to the presence of a wound from the incision. This study aimed to compare marginal flap with para-marginal flap on postoperative complications by the measurements on pre and post-surgical plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), maximum opening of the mouth (MOM), pain perception (PP) and post-surgical tumefaction (PT).

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 40 patients were recruited and randomly allocated in two groups. In Group 1, third molar extraction was carried out after a marginal flap design was performed, while in Group 2 a para-marginal flap was performed. Plaque index, bleeding on probing, maximum mouth opening, and distal probing were assessed right before and one week after surgery, while post-operative pain perception and post-operative swelling were accounted one week following surgery.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were reported between treatment groups, as the para-marginal flap led to better outcomes for all the measured indexes.

CONCLUSIONS

The para-marginal flap design may decrease the occurrence of post-operative complications and discomforts after mandibular third molar surgery, compared to marginal flap design.

Impact of Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix on Mandibular Second Molar after Third Molar Extraction: Retrospective Study

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate bone healing after autogenous demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) grafts, focusing on the distal root of the mandibular second molar after the extraction of the third. We included retrospective data from 20 patients who had undergone molar extractions (15 male, 41.9 ± 12.0 years) between January 2020 and September 2022 and had DDM grafts implanted on the extraction socket, immediately ("immediate graft") or 6 weeks ("delayed graft") after the first surgery without primary closure. Patients who underwent grafting on only one side were used as the control group (n = 4). Bone defects at the mandibular second molar were measured preoperatively and 4 months after the graft surgery using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Improvement of bone defect (i.e., the change in the bony defect pre- vs. postoperatively) was compared between the control and graft groups using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, and the difference between immediate and delayed grafts was analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Complications such as infections or graft failure did not occur. Although pre-operative defects were smaller in the control than in the graft group (2.98 ± 1.77 and 10.02 ± 3.22 mm, p = 0.001), post-operative defects were similar in both (2.12 ± 0.59 and 2.29 ± 1.67 mm, respectively). The improvement ratio was not statistically significant in the control group (22.68 ± 15.36%) but a difference was observed in the graft group (76.70 ± 15.36%, p = 0.001). The amount of improvement of bone defect was not affected by graft timing or patient sex. In conclusion, DDM can improve bone defect at the distal aspect of the mandibular second molar after third molar extraction.

Effect of Orthodontic Combined with Implant Repair on Aesthetic Effect and Gingival Crevicular Fluid Factor in Patients with Dentition Defect and Periodontitis

In order to solve the effect of orthodontics combined with implant repair on the aesthetic effect and gingival crevicular fluid factor of patients with dentition defect and periodontitis, 60 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of chronic periodontitis were proposed. They were randomly divided into treatment group (taking Bushen Huoxue Guchi recipe for 3 courses while basic periodontal treatment) and control group (only basic periodontal treatment without taking any drugs). The experimental method of 30 cases in each group showed that PD, Al, and GI in the treatment group and control group decreased to varying degrees compared with those before treatment. The treatment group decreased significantly compared with the control group (P < 0.01). Chronic periodontitis is a common clinical periodontal disease, accounting for up to 95%, local stimulation, a variety of anaerobic bacteria infection, and periodontal plaque, and other factors may cause the occurrence of diseases. Routine treatment mainly includes upper gingival cleaning, lower curettage treatment, and equal root surface treatment. Although the clinical symptoms can be alleviated to a certain extent, the cause cannot be fundamentally excluded, leading to the disease progression in some patients and the formation of aggressive periodontitis and necrotizing periodontal disease.

Feasibility and Efficacy of a Degradable Magnesium-Alloy GBR Membrane for Bone Augmentation in a Distal Bone-Defect Model in Beagle Dogs

We explored the feasibility and efficacy of a degradable magnesium (Mg) alloy guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the treatment of bone defects after tooth extraction. A GBR membrane (MAR-Gide (MG)) was used to treat a mandibular second molar (M2M)-distal bone defect (DBD). In eight beagle dogs, bilateral mandibular second and fourth premolars were hemi-sected. The distal roots were removed to create a two-wall bony defect of dimension 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm to simulate M2M-DBD. Thirty-two bone defects were assigned randomly into four groups according to GBR membranes (MG and Bio-Gide (BG)) applied and the time of killing (3 months and 6 months after surgery). The osteogenesis of bone defects and MG degradation were analyzed using micro-CT, histology (staining, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. MG did not increase the prevalence of infection, wound dehiscence, or subcutaneous emphysema compared with those using BG. Trabecular volume/total volume at 3 months (63.71 ± 10.4% vs. 59.97 ± 8.94%) was significantly higher in the group MG than that in the group BG. Implanted MG was degraded completely within 3 months, and "island-shaped" new bone was found near MG degradation products. A significant difference was not found in vertical bone height or percent of new bone formation (45.44 ± 12.28% vs. 43.49 ± 7.12%) between the groups. The concentration of rare-earth elements in mandibular lymph nodes of the group MG was significantly higher than that of the group BG (P ≤ 0.017) but did not lead to histopathological changes. In summary, MG exhibited good biocompatibility and clinical applicability compared with BG in vivo. The osteogenic effect of MG could be enhanced by regulating the degradation rate of Mg-alloy.

The wisdom behind the third molars removal: A prospective study of 106 cases

Purpose

This paper aims to evaluate the decision-making of wisdom teeth extractions (M3s extraction) and the epidemiological profile in the targeted population.

Materials and method

This was a prospective analysis study of 106 patients at our hospital august 20, 1953 specialist hospital, which is a referral center between January 1, 2020 and January 1, 2021. The patients are divided into 2 groups according decision-making of wisdom teeth removal based on scientific evidence if it's right or wrong.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding sex (P = 0.478), educational level (P = 0.718), or working status (P = 0.606). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding general co-morbidity (P = 1.00) or oral history (P = 0.28). The mean age of the sample was 32.12 years (SD = 11.337 years, range = 17–70 years, median = 30 -years). We reported that only 28% of the third molars were surgically extracted. We included in Group (I), 81 patients who were treated for third molars removal which the decision-making was justified. In Group (II), 25 patients were treated for third molars removal which the decision-making was unjustified. Group (I) comprised 30 men and 51 women with a mean age of 30 years. Group (II) comprised 7 men and 18 women with a mean age of 27 years. The assessment of surgical outcomes (operating time, blood loss, hospital stay) showed no difference between groups.

Discussion

Monitoring asymptomatic wisdom teeth appears to be an appropriate strategy. Regarding retention versus prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic wisdom teeth, decision-making should be based on the best evidence combined with clinical experience.76.4% had a reason for extraction that was justified. The reasons why extraction of the wisdom tooth was not justified in our study population was either: extraction for prophylaxis or in the case of asymptomatic non-pathological third molars; without scientific evidence.

Conclusion

This subject, which is perpetually debated, requires updating dental health authorities by evaluating new conservative procedures.

•

Third molars are a major focus of interest in dentistry.

•

Preliminary indication and wrong decision-making for teeth extraction have resulted in many healthy teeth being sacrificed.

•

Debate continues about the best strategies for the management of wisdom teeth.

[Characterization of third molar extraction]

The aim of this study was to characterize the main indications, contraindications and prophylactic actions for third molar extraction according to the literature. The Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using a total of 3 search keys, including publications up to 5 years old, in English or Spanish, with availability of full text. Eighteen articles were selected and showed that the most frequent indication for third molar extraction was the diagnosis of pericoronaritis, followed by distal cervical caries in the lower second molar, and root resorption in adjacent teeth and cysts. In turn, it may be indicated to facilitate other types of dental treatment, such as orthodontics, orthognathic surgery and rehabilitation. In relation to contraindications, the risk of intraoperative complications was associated with the inferior alveolar nerve, advanced age and the predomination of systemic involvement. Prophylactic extraction was included in the analysis in 72.2% of the articles, with a predominance of exodontia of asymptomatic and disease-free third molars. Finally, there are clear indications and contraindications for third molar extraction, being mainly associated with pathological changes, indications for orthodontic treatment, orthognathic surgery and rehabilitative treatment. However, there is controversy in the literature regarding prophylactic extraction, emphasizing that not all retained and asymptomatic third molars should be extracted. Third molar extraction should be evaluated on a case by case basis, considering the benefits, the patient's characteristics and the risk of postoperative complications.