Improving sensing and detection performance in subcutaneous monitors

Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation preceding persistent atrial fibrillation in a horse using an implantable loop recorder with remote monitoring

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used in equine cardiology to detect arrhythmias in the context of collapse, poor performance or monitoring for recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However to date, the ILR has never been reported to be used with a remote monitoring functionality in horses, therefore the arrhythmia is only discovered when a clinician interrogates the ILR using dedicated equipment, which might delay diagnosis and intervention. This case report describes the use of an ILR with remote monitoring functionality in a horse with recurrent AF. The remote monitoring consisted of a transmission device located in the stable allowing daily transmission of arrhythmia recordings and functioning messages to an online server, available for the clinician to evaluate without specialised equipment. The ILR detected an episode of paroxysmal AF approximately 3 months after implantation. Seven months after implantation, initiation of persistent AF was seen on an episode misclassified by the ILR as bradycardia, and the horse was retired. This report shows the feasibility and benefits of remote monitoring for ILRs in horses, but also the shortcomings of current algorithms to interpret the equine electrocardiogram.

Correlation between the electrocardiogram amplitude detected by an implantable cardiac monitor and the implantation depth

INTRODUCTION

Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) primarily use R-R intervals in subcutaneous electrocardiograms (ECGs) to detect arrhythmias. Therefore, reliable detection of R-wave amplitude by an ICM is vital. Since ICMs detect subcutaneous ECGs, the impact of the implantation depth should be assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study investigated the influence of ICM depth on R-wave (ICM-R) amplitude on an ECG generated by an ICM (JOT Dx; Abbott). Overall, 58 patients who underwent ICM implantation at Kamagaya General Hospital from May 2022 to April 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The depth-position was measured using ultrasound imaging after implantation. The depth of the ICM did not show any correlation with ICM-R amplitude (r = -.0141, p = .294). However, the distance between the ICM and the heart surface showed a significant correlation with ICM-R amplitude (r = -.581, p < .001). Body weight (r = -.0283, p = .033) and body mass index (r = -.0342, p = .009) were associated with ICM-R amplitude. S wave in the V1 -lead was also associated with ICM-R amplitude (r = .481, p < .001). After multivariate analysis, the distance between the ICM and heart surface and the S wave in V1 were independent determinants for the ICM-R amplitude.

CONCLUSION

The ICM-R amplitude may be higher with the ICM implanted deeper.

R-wave amplitude changes with posture and physical activity over time in an insertable cardiac monitor

Background

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are accepted tools in cardiac arrhythmia management. Consistent R-wave amplitude (RWA) is essential for optimal detection.

Objectives

Assess RWAs with posture/activities at insertion and at 30 days.

Methods

Participants (n = 90) with Confirm Rx™ ICM had RWAs measured in different postures (supine, right-side [RS], left-side [LS], sitting, and standing) and defined physical activities (including isometric push [IPUSH] and pull) at 2 time points. ICMs were inserted in 45° to sternum and parasternal orientations.

Results

There were significant reductions at insertion with RS, LS, sitting, or standing vs supine (reference position) (all P < .05). At 30 days, significant changes only occurred with LS and sitting (P < .05). Sex had an effect on RWAs, with females having significant variability at insertion (supine vs RS, LS, sitting, standing, and IPUSH; all P < .05). Males showed large RWA interpatient variabilities but minimal differences between positions vs supine. At 30 days, RS, LS, and sitting positions remained significant for females (P < .05), while in males RWAs were higher than at insertion for most postures and activities. The orientation 45° to sternum had consistently higher RWAs vs parasternal orientation at both time points (P < .0001). In females, ICM orientation had no significant effect on RWAs; however, in males the 45° to sternum produced higher RWAs. ICM movement from the insertion site showed no correlation with RWA changes.

Conclusion

The mean RWAs were higher at 30 days with less interparticipant and interpostural variability; males had higher RWAs compared to females; 45° to sternum orientation had higher RWAs; and ICM migration from the insertion site did not affect RWAs.

Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P-wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder

BACKGROUND

Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P-wave sensing in implantable loop recorder (ILR) are unknown. We aimed to investigate determining factors and ILR implantation angle that may improve QRS complex and P-wave sensing in ILR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients who underwent ILR implantation or follow-up analysis. Patient demographic, clinical, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart angle, and ILR angle data were collected as predictor variables. Associations between ILR QRS amplitude/P-wave detectability and each predictor variable were investigated.

RESULTS

Univariate linear regression showed that ILR QRS amplitude was significantly associated with age, height, ILR angle, and QRS amplitudes of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (lead I, II, aVR [inverted aVR], aVF, V1-V6) and Holter ECG (lead V3, V5). Among discrete variables, only left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) affected ILR QRS amplitude (P = .016). A multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that ILR angle (β = -0.008, P < .001), lead aVR amplitude (β = 0.469, P = .003), Holter lead V5 amplitude (β = 0.116, P = .049), Age (β = -0.005, P = .014), and LVH (β = 0.213, P = .031) were independent determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Logistic regression revealed that heart angle significantly affected ILR P-wave detectability (β = 0.12, P = .008). Multiple logistic regression revealed that heart angle (β = 0.121, P = .013) and lead V1 amplitude (β = 28.1, P = .034) were independent determinants of ILR P-wave detectability.

CONCLUSION

ILR insertion angle, lead aVR QRS amplitude, Holter lead V5 QRS amplitude, age, and LVH are determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Heart angle and lead V1 P-wave amplitude of 12-lead ECG are determinants of ILR P-wave detectability.

Over- and undersensing-pitfalls of arrhythmia detection with implantable devices and wearables

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a cornerstone of arrhythmia and heart failure detection as well as management. In recent years new kinds of devices have emerged which can be used subcutaneously or worn on the skin. In particular for large-scale arrhythmia monitoring, small, unobtrusive gadgets seem positioned to upend paradigms and care delivery. However, the performance of CIEDs and wearables is only as good as their sensing and detection capacities. Whether for pacing, defibrillation or diagnostic monitoring, the device must be able to process and filter the sensed signal to reduce noise and to exclude irrelevant physiological signals. The demands on sensing and detection quality will differ depending on how the information is applied. With a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, withheld or erroneous therapy can have severe consequences and accurate and reliable detection of cardiac function is crucial. Monitoring devices are usually used in risk assessment and management, with greater tolerance for isolated artefacts or lower quality of readings. This review discusses sensing and detection and the performance to date by CIEDs as well as subcutaneous and wearable devices.

Diagnostic accuracy of R-wave detection by insertable cardiac monitors

BACKGROUND

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) allow prolonged rhythm monitoring, but the diagnostic performance can be hampered by false positive arrhythmia alerts related to inadequate R-wave sensing. This study assesses the prevalence and predictors of inadequate R-wave sensing (both over- and undersensing) among different ICM types.

METHODS

Patients implanted with an ICM at Ghent University Hospital between January 2017 and August 2018 were included. ICM tracings recorded at interrogation or transmitted by remote monitoring were reviewed for inadequate R-wave sensing leading to false arrhythmia alerts. Patient and implant characteristics were retrieved from the medical records and implant reports.

RESULTS

The study screened 135 patients (age 59 ± 19 years, 44% female) implanted with different ICM types: Reveal LINQ™ and XT (Medtronic): n = 92 (68%), Confirm and Confirm Rx (Abbott): n = 35 (26%), and BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik): n = 8 (6%). ICM tracings were analyzed in 112 patients (83%). False arrhythmia alerts occurred in 22 (20%) patients, most frequently related to undersensing (77%). False diagnosis of bradycardia or pause was documented in 64%, false high ventricular rates in 14%, and false atrial fibrillation alerts in 22%. Occurrence of R-wave changes was not related to patient characteristics or implant R-wave sensing. A trend toward higher number of inadequate R-wave sensing seems to occur with nonparasternal implant sites (P = .074).

CONCLUSIONS

False arrhythmia alerts due to inadequate R-wave sensing occurred in 20% of ICM patients independent of implant features and patient characteristics.

BioMonitor 2 Pilot Study: Early Experience With Implantation of the Biotronik BioMonitor 2 Implantable Cardiac Monitor

BACKGROUND

The BioMonitor 2 Pilot Study assessed the implantation procedure, the sensing amplitude and the remote monitoring transmission success rate of the second generation implantable cardiac monitor, the BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multi-centre, single-arm, non-randomised study involving seven operators in five sites across Australia. Data were collected at implantation, during clinic visits at 1 week and 1 month post-implantation, and through wireless remote monitoring.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with indications for long-term cardiac monitoring underwent successful insertion of a study device. The median implantation time was 9 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 5-14 mins). The mean R-wave amplitude at 1 week was 0.75±0.39mV and remained stable over the follow-up period. Within 1 day, 97% of the patients connected to the remote monitoring network and daily messages were transmitted on 93.8% of all study days. Seventy-six per cent of patients transmitted at least one subcutaneous ECG (sECG), with a median number of sECGs per patient of seven (IQR 3-37) within 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the BioMonitor 2 Pilot study confirm the excellent sensing amplitudes afforded by this new device and the utility of the implantation tools and technique. Patient compliance with and the transmission success rate of the home monitoring system were excellent.

Efficacy of Subcutaneous Electrocardiogram Leads for Synchronous Timing During Chronic Counterpulsation Therapy

Counterpulsation devices (CPDs) require an accurate, reliable electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform for triggering inflation and deflation. Surface electrodes are for short-term use, and transvenous/epicardial leads require invasive implant procedure. A subcutaneous ECG lead configuration was developed as an alternative approach for long-term use with timing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. In this study, efficacy testing was completed by simultaneously recording ECG waveforms from clinical-grade epicardial (control) and subcutaneous (test) leads in chronic ischemic heart failure calves implanted with CPD for up to 30 days. Sensitivity and specificity of CPD triggering by R-wave detection was quantified for each lead configuration. The subcutaneous leads provided 98.9% positive predictive value and 98.9% sensitivity compared to the epicardial ECG leads. Lead migration (n = 1) and fracture (n = 1) were observed in only 2 of 40 implanted leads, without adversely impacting triggering efficacy due to lead redundancy. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of subcutaneous ECG leads for long-term CPD timing and potential use as an alternative method for MCS device timing.

R-wave sensing in an implantable cardiac monitor without ECG-based preimplant mapping: results from a multicenter clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Reducing the form factor of an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) may simplify device implant. This study evaluated R-wave sensing at a range of electrode distances and a preferred device implant location without mapping.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for a Medtronic Reveal® ICM implant (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) underwent a preimplant pocket recording using a diagnostic recording catheter. The ICM implant location was left to the discretion of the implanting physician, but a "recommended" position spanned the V2 -V3 electrocardiogram electrode location in an oblique 45° angle. R-wave amplitudes were analyzed from ICM follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 41 subjects (15 male, age 57 ± 16 years) had the maximum surface-filtered R-wave at the recommended location. Fourteen patients underwent diagnostic recording across the range of electrode spacing. There was a strong correlation between the R-wave amplitude and electrode distance (r(2) = 0.97, P < 0.001) with an increase of 29 μV per 2.5 mm. Comparing normalized R-wave distributions between the recommended ICM implant group (Group 1, n = 19) and the remaining patients (Group 2, n = 7), the proportion of ICM R-wave counts of amplitude 0.25-1.2 mV was higher (79% vs 46%, P < 0.05). Of 17 patients in Group 1 who had ≥ 1-month ICM follow-up (79 ± 45 days), no sensing-related false arrhythmia detection was found in 16 (93%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The subcutaneous R-wave amplitude correlates with electrode spacing in the implant zone of ICM patients. Implant locations at the V2 -V3 position at a 45° angle offer an adequate R wave for sensing. Preimplant mapping to achieve acceptable R-wave amplitude may not be necessary.

Performance of an external transtelephonic loop recorder for automated detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia, some of the properties make its detection challenging. In daily practice, underdiagnosis can lead to less effective treatment in prevention of stroke. Based on data from studies on treatment of AF, more intensive follow-up strategies, including 7-day Holter recording, 30-day event recording, and even implantable cardiac monitoring devices, are suggested. The study purpose is to evaluate the performance of a continuous single-channel loop recorder with automatic AF detection and transtelephonic electrocardiogram (ECG) transmission capabilities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A consecutive cohort of 153 patients admitted to the stroke unit with a presumptive diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular accident was screened for AF. Twenty-four-hour rhythm observation was performed using a single-channel external loop recorder (ELR) configured for automated AF detection. A total of 45 patients with a known history of AF, AF on the admission ECG, or incomplete registrations were excluded. Extensive additional frequency-based settings were used to establish a reference registration. In total, 2923 recordings were transmitted. We evaluated all events, of which 1190 were designated by the device as AF. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for identifying AF using the ELR were, respectively, 93%, 51%, 5%, and 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this ELR validation study, the dedicated AF detection algorithm showed to be highly sensitive but not specific for AF. Applicability of an ELR might be limited for efficacious detection of AF, as manual verification is mandatory for a vast amount of recordings.

Subcutaneous electrocardiogram monitors and their field of view

Continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring of cardiac patients on a long-term, even permanent, basis has become possible. Postsurgical cases, those with significant risk factors, or patients with chronic conditions are candidates for these procedures to assess evolving risk factors and detect life-threatening events. A small sensing device can be implanted subcutaneously to assess the ECG, transmitting status and alerts to local caregivers or a remote monitoring service. We and others have shown that a differential electrode pair with only 2- to 3-cm spacing can produce QRS amplitudes greater than 1 mV, sufficient to accurately identify asystole, tachyarrhythmias, and ST-segment changes. Medtronic's REVEAL and St Jude Medical's CONFIRM are implantable look recorders (ILRs) with a single pair of subcutaneous electrodes mounted on the surface of the case (6 × 2 × 0.7 cm). They store representative rhythm strips when the heart rate exceeds preset limits or when the patient presses a button on the accompanying actuator. These records may be transferred for physician review during a subsequent office visit. Transoma's SLEUTH is a similar ILR, except that one of the electrodes is at the end of a 6-cm lead tunneled under the skin and the wider separation may result in a larger ECG amplitude. Instead of storing the records, SLEUTH transmits them through the skin to a home base unit, which sends them via telephone to a monitoring service. Angel Medical's ALERT system also has a tunneled lead, but one that is introduced pervenously into the right ventricle hoping to detect ST changes in addition to rhythm abnormalities. Advanced multivector ILR devices with integrated event alerting are rapidly approaching commercialization. AJ Medical Devices' CARDIOALARM (4 × 4 × 0.6 cm) has 4 electrodes at the corners of the square package, arranged as 2 orthogonal recording pairs that can produce a robust signal that is relatively immune to signal fluctuations caused by changes in the direction of cardiac activation and patient's body position. This permits accurate identification of dramatic changes in the ECG pattern, such as those occurring in ventricular fibrillation and polymorphic tachycardia. Because of this feature, CARDIOALARM can detect cardiac arrest, and its external receiver can alert bystanders to begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation and can automatically summon Emergency Medical Services. In the future, addition of other sensors, integration of data streams via body surface wireless networks, and real-time interpretive algorithms will allow enhanced monitoring systems to more generally assess evolving risks, the impacts of therapeutic interventions, and patient compliance with rehabilitative programs. When coupled to remote medical monitoring services, these devices have the potential to dramatically impact patient outcomes by lessening the diagnostic dependence on symptom recognition and decreasing event response times. Significant cost savings may also be realized through more efficient use of specialist resources, reduction in the number of office visits to physicians, and long-term improvements in patient health. Structural and behavior barriers to adoption need to be addressed for these methods to reach their full potential, addressing patient privacy concerns, adequate reimbursement, and integration into standard care protocols.