ST-segment abnormalities are associated with long-term prognosis in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The ERICO-ECG study

Methodological identification of anomalies episodes in ECG streams: a systematic mapping study

An electrocardiogram is a medical examination tool for measuring different patterns of heart blood flow circle either in the form of usual or non-invasive patterns. These patterns are useful for the identification of morbidity condition of the heart especially in certain conditions of heart abnormality and arrhythmia. Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of them that happened due to sudden blockage of blood by the cause of malfunction of heart. In electrocardiography (ECG) intensity of MI is highlighted on the basis of unusual patterns of T wave changes. Various studies have contributed for MI through T wave's classification, but more to the point of T wave has always attracted the ECG researchers. Methodology. This Study is primarily designed for proposing the combination of latest methods that are worked for the solutions of pre-defined research questions. Such solutions are designed in the form of the systematic review process (SLR) by following the Kitchen ham guidance. The literature survey is a two phase's process, at first phase collect the articles that were published in IEEE Xplore, Scopus, science direct and Springer from 2008 to 2023. It consist of steps; the first level is executed by filtrating the articles on the basis of keyword phase of title and abstract filter. Similarly, at two level the manuscripts are scanned through filter of eligibility criteria of articles selection. The last level belongs to the quality assessment of articles, in such level articles are rectified through evaluation of domain experts. Results. Finally, the selected articles are addressed with research questions and briefly discuss these selected state-of-the-art methods that are worked for the T wave classification. These address units behave as solutions to research problems that are highlighted in the form of research questions. Conclusion and future directions. During the survey process for these solutions, we got some critical observations in the form of gaps that reflected the other directions for researchers. In which feature engineering, different dependencies of ECG features and dimensional reduction of ECG for the better ECG analysis are reflection of future directions.

Frequency and Reasons for Non-Administration and Suspension of Drugs During an Acute Coronary Syndrome Event. The ERICO Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have discussed the reasons for pharmacological undertreatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency and reasons for the non-administration and suspension of medications during in-hospital treatments of ACS in the Strategy of Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ERICO) study.

METHODS

The present study analyzed the medical charts of the 563 participants in the ERICO study to evaluate the frequency and reasons for the non-administration and/or suspension of medications. Logistic regression models were built to analyze if sex, age ≥65 years of age, educational level, or ACS subtype were associated with (a) the non-administration of ≥1 medications; and (b) the non-administration or suspension of ≥1 medications. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

This study's sample included 58.1% males, with a median of 62 years of age. In 183 (32.5%) participants, ≥1 medications were not administered, while in 288 (51.2%), ≥1 medications were not administered or were suspended. The most common reasons were the risk of bleeding (aspirin, clopidogrel, and heparin), heart failure (beta blockers), and hypotension (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers). Individuals aged ≥65 (odds ratio [OR]:1.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:1.05-2.19) and those with unstable angina (OR:1.72; 95% CI:1.07-2.75) showed a higher probability for the non-administration of ≥1 medication. Considering only patients with myocardial infarction, being ≥65 years of age was associated with both the non-administration and the non-administration or suspension of ≥1 medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-administration or suspension of ≥1 medication proved to be common in this ERICO study. Individuals of ≥65 years of age or with unstable angina showed a higher probability of the non-administration of ≥1 medication and may be undertreated in this scenario. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(5):830-839).

[Myocardial Infarction in Women of Reproductive age: Risk Factors, Clinical Picture, Prognosis]

Aim        To study risk factors (RF) and clinical and anamnestic features of the course and prediction in women with a preserved menstrual cycle and postmenopausal women after ST segment elevation (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).Material and methods        This study included 121 women aged 32 to 55 years diagnosed with MI. The patients were divided into two groups, group 1 (study group) consisting of 60 women with preserved menstrual function (1А, STEMI; n=38; age, 48.3±5.7 years and 1B, NSTEMI; n=22; age. 49.0±4.8 years), and group 2 (control) consisting of 61 postmenopausal women (2А, STEMI; n=43; age, 49.05±4.9 years; 2B, NSTEMI; n=18; age, 49.9±3.5 years). Beside the analysis of RF and clinical features, a prediction was produced for each subgroup at one year after discharge from the hospital based on the following indexes: hospitalization for unstable angina, non-fatal MI, revascularization, cardiovascular (CV) death, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included all these outcomes.Results   In all subgroups, the most frequent RFs were arterial hypertension (AH), overweight and obesity, family history, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Among patients with STEMI, smoking was significantly more frequently observed in the group with preserved menstrual function. Oral contraceptives were used by 3 and 6 women of reproductive age in the STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups, respectively. Incidence of STEMI as the onset of ischemic heart disease (IHD, 46.7%) was higher than in subgroup 2A (27.9 %; р=0.003). Early postinfarction angina was a more frequent complication of MI in subgroup 1A than in 2A (р=0.02).Conclusion            The incidence rate of RFs, including AH, overweight and obesity, dyslipidemia, family history, and DM2, was similar in both STEMI and NSTEMI groups. Incidence rate of smoking was statistically significantly higher in subgroup 1A. One-year prediction for women with STEMI and NSTEMI was comparable irrespective of the presence or absence of the menstrual function.

Time-To-Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Unit of First Contact in the ERICO Study

Background

To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating the influence of the unit of the first contact on the frequency and time of pharmacological treatment during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event.

Objectives

The main objective was to investigate if the unit of first contact influenced the frequency and time of aspirin treatment in the Strategy of Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ERICO) study.

Methods

We analyzed the pharmacological treatment time in 830 ERICO participants - 700 individuals for whom the hospital was the unit of first contact and 130 who initially sought primary care units. We built logistic regression models to study whether the unit of first contact was associated with a treatment time of less than three hours.

Results

Individuals who went to primary care units received the first aspirin dose in those units in 75.6% of the cases. The remaining 24.4% received aspirin at the hospital. Despite this finding, individuals from primary care still had aspirin administered within three hours more frequently than those who went to the hospital (76.8% vs 52.6%; p<0.001 and 100% vs. 70.7%; p=0.001 for non ST-elevation ACS and ST-elevation myocardial infarction, respectively). In adjusted models, individuals coming from primary care were more likely to receive aspirin more quickly (odds ratio: 3.66; 95% confidence interval: 2.06-6.51).

Conclusions

In our setting, individuals from primary care were more likely to receive aspirin earlier. Enhancing the ability of primary care units to provide early treatment and safe transportation may be beneficial in similar settings.