Electrocardiographic changes and conduction disturbances after transfemoral aortic valve implantation with Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis

Conduction dynamics over time after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An expert review

New conduction disorders remain a frequent complication in current transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) era. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) occurs early in about 20-30 % of TAVR-patients, persists at 1 month in about 35-45 % of cases and will likely remain thereafter. Third-degree atrioventricular block (AV3B) affects approximately 15 % of patients. Pacemaker dependency gradually decreases throughout follow-up and approximately 25-35 % of patients remain pacemaker dependent at one year. We aimed to review what is currently known about the dynamics of acquired conduction disorders, including extraction of predictors, and how to interpret these dynamics in light of an early discharge policy.

Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison between SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra balloon-expandable valves

Background

Conduction disorders (CD) are the most common complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). The last generation of Edwards balloon expandable valves, the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U), is provided with an external sealing skirt that aims to further reduce paravalvular leakage (PVL) compared to SAPIEN 3 (S3) and could potentially lead to higher CD rate. We sought to investigate the rate of new-onset CD in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 or S3U valve.

Methods

We included 582 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in a single high-volume Center. Patients with previously implanted pacemaker and Valve in valve procedures were excluded. CD rate was evaluated early after implantation and at discharge.

Results

No significant difference in the overall CD rate was found between S3 and S3U patients both immediately after the procedure (S3 45.5% vs. S3U 41.8%, p = 0.575) and at discharge (S3 30.4% vs. S3U 35.6%, p = 0.348) with low rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (S3 6.3% vs. S3U 5.5%, p = 0.749). No significant differences were found also in patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (S3 8.2% vs. S3U 5%, p = 0.648). A significantly lower rate of PVL was found with S3U compared to S3 (S3 42% vs. S3U 26%, p = 0.007). According to the manufacturer’s guidelines we confirmed that S3U were implanted in a significantly higher position compared to S3 (S3 4.89 ± 1.57 mm vs. S3U 4.47 ± 1.36 mm, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

No significant difference in the rate of CD, including the need for PPM implantation, was found in patients undergoing TAVI with the S3 compared to S3U. Moreover, S3U significantly reduced the PVL rate.

Early Resolution of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the SAPIEN 3 Valve

New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) but can resolve in the post-TAVI period. We sought to examine the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of early resolution of new-onset LBBB among TAVI recipients with a SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve. Among 1,203 S3-TAVI recipients without a pre-existing pacemaker or wide QRS complex at our institution between 2016 and 2019, we identified 143 patients who developed new-onset LBBB during TAVI and divided them according to the resolution or persistence of LBBB by the next day post-TAVI to compare high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) rates. Patients with resolved LBBB (n = 74, 52%), compared with those with persistent LBBB, were more often women and had a shorter QRS duration at baseline and post-TAVI, with a smaller S3 size and a shallower implantation depth. A multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated significant associations of post-TAVI QRS duration (per 10 ms increase, odds ratio = 0.60 [95% confidence interval = 0.44 to 0.82]) and implantation depth (per 1-mm-depth-increase, 0.77 [0.61 to 0.97]) with a lower likelihood of LBBB resolution. No patient with resolved LBBB developed HAVB within 30 days post-TAVI. Meanwhile, 8 patients (11.6%) with persistent LBBB developed HAVB. The 2-year PPM rate was significantly higher after persistent LBBB than after resolved LBBB (30.3% vs 4.5%, log-rank p <0.001), mainly driven by higher 30-day PPM rate (18.8% vs 0.0%). In conclusion, about half of new-onset LBBBs that occurred during S3-TAVI resolved by the next day post-TAVI without HAVB. In contrast, new-onset persistent LBBB may need follow-up with ambulatory monitoring within 30 days because of the HAVB risk.

Evaluation of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in pre-existing right bundle branch block patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve

Aims

The 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend early pacemaker implantation in pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients who develop PR prolongation or QRS axis change after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to evaluate this recommendation in TAVI recipients with a balloon-expandable valve (BEV).

Methods and results

We retrospectively reviewed 188 pre-existing RBBB patients without pre-existing permanent pacemaker (PPM) who underwent TAVI with a BEV at our institution in 2015-19. Patients who developed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) during TAVI or within 24 h post-TAVI were excluded. Eligible patients were divided according to the guideline-directed criteria (ΔPR interval ≥20 ms and/or QRS axis change). Patients who met the criteria (n = 102, 54.3%), compared with those who did not (n = 86), had a higher prevalence of baseline right axis deviation and were more likely to have received a larger valve with greater oversizing. The 30-day delayed HAVB rate did not differ significantly between the groups (3.9% vs. 4.7%, P = 1.00; odds ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-3.45). There was also no significant difference in terms of death (5.0% vs. 8.4% at 1 year; overall log-rank P = 0.94) or a composite of death or PPM implantation (14.8% vs. 16.6% at 1 year; overall log-rank P = 0.94) during follow-up post-TAVI. The majority of PR prolongations (79.4%) and QRS axis changes (52.0%) regressed within the following 24 h.

Conclusion

The present data did not demonstrate an association of significant changes in PR interval or QRS axis with heightened delayed HAVB risk in BEV recipients with pre-existing RBBB. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

One-Year Follow-Up of Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the SAPIEN 3 Valve

Long-term evolution of new-onset conduction abnormalities and need of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have not been extensively evaluated. We describe the incidence and time course of new conduction abnormalities and the rate of PPI with the new-generation transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3). In total, 266 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI were retrospectively analyzed. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms at baseline, after TAVI, at discharge, at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up were evaluated to identify conduction abnormalities and PPI requirements to investigate the correlates of PPI. After TAVI, a significant increase in PR interval duration and in QRS complex width was observed. New-onset left bundle branch block was observed in 65 patients (24%) after TAVI. The number of patients with left bundle branch block was maximum at hospital discharge and decreased at 12-month follow-up (39% and 32%, respectively). Thirty-five patients (13%) required PPI during the follow-up. However, paced rhythm was only observed in 7% of the patients with a complete 12-month follow-up. Patients who underwent PPI had a higher prevalence of first-degree atrioventricular block, complete right bundle branch block, and wider QRS complex at baseline. Baseline right bundle branch block and QRS width immediately after TAVI were the only variables independently associated with PPI. In conclusion, conduction disorders have a temporary nature after TAVI and showed a trend toward stabilization during the following months. With this new-generation device, the incidence of new conduction abnormalities requiring PPI is relatively low.