Data driven feature selection and machine learning to detect misplaced V1 and V2 chest electrodes when recording the 12‑lead electrocardiogram

A lightweight deep learning approach for detecting electrocardiographic lead misplacement

Objective. Electrocardiographic (ECG) lead misplacement can result in distorted waveforms and amplitudes, significantly impacting accurate interpretation. Although lead misplacement is a relatively low-probability event, with an incidence ranging from 0.4% to 4%, the large number of ECG records in clinical practice necessitates the development of an effective detection method. This paper aimed to address this gap by presenting a novel lead misplacement detection method based on deep learning models.Approach. We developed two novel lightweight deep learning model for limb and chest lead misplacement detection, respectively. For limb lead misplacement detection, two limb leads and V6 were used as inputs, while for chest lead misplacement detection, six chest leads were used as inputs. Our models were trained and validated using the Chapman database, with an 8:2 train-validation split, and evaluated on the PTB-XL, PTB, and LUDB databases. Additionally, we examined the model interpretability on the LUDB databases. Limb lead misplacement simulations were performed using mathematical transformations, while chest lead misplacement scenarios were simulated by interchanging pairs of leads. The detection performance was assessed using metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Macro F1-score.Main results. Our experiments simulated three scenarios of limb lead misplacement and nine scenarios of chest lead misplacement. The proposed two models achieved Macro F1-scores ranging from 93.42% to 99.61% on two heterogeneous test sets, demonstrating their effectiveness in accurately detecting lead misplacement across various arrhythmias.Significance. The significance of this study lies in providing a reliable open-source algorithm for lead misplacement detection in ECG recordings. The source code is available athttps://github.com/wjcai/ECG_lead_check.

Retrospective validation of a machine learning clinical decision support tool for myocardial infarction risk stratification

Diagnosis and appropriate intervention for myocardial infarction (MI) are time-sensitive but rely on clinical measures that can be progressive and initially inconclusive, underscoring the need for an accurate and early predictor of MI to support diagnostic and clinical management decisions. The objective of this study was to develop a machine learning algorithm (MLA) to predict MI diagnosis based on electronic health record data (EHR) readily available during Emergency Department assessment. An MLA was developed using retrospective patient data. The MLA used patient data as they became available in the first 3 h of care to predict MI diagnosis (defined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision code) at any time during the encounter. The MLA obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 70%, outperforming the comparator scoring systems TIMI and GRACE on all metrics. An MLA can synthesize complex EHR data to serve as a clinically relevant risk stratification tool for MI.

Big Data and Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Threats in Electrophysiology

The combination of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) is having an increasing impact on the field of electrophysiology. Algorithms are created to improve the automated diagnosis of clinical ECGs or ambulatory rhythm devices. Furthermore, the use of AI during invasive electrophysiological studies or combining several diagnostic modalities into AI algorithms to aid diagnostics are being investigated. However, the clinical performance and applicability of created algorithms are yet unknown. In this narrative review, opportunities and threats of AI in the field of electrophysiology are described, mainly focusing on ECGs. Current opportunities are discussed with their potential clinical benefits as well as the challenges. Challenges in data acquisition, model performance, (external) validity, clinical implementation, algorithm interpretation as well as the ethical aspects of AI research are discussed. This article aims to guide clinicians in the evaluation of new AI applications for electrophysiology before their clinical implementation.