Leadless pacing in cardiac transplant recipients: Primary results of a multicenter case experience

The application of fluoroscopic criteria to define leadless pacemakers implant position and the effect of location on device performance

OBJECTIVE

Leadless pacemakers (LPs) were designed to avoid complications associated with transvenous pacing. To minimise risk of perforations, there is preference towards implanting LPs into the septum rather than the apex or free wall.An objective yet feasible way of characterising the LP location is currently lacking. We report a simple radiological method of defining LP position and our analysis of the impact of implantation site on performance of LPs.

METHODS

The first 100 LPs implanted at our UK centre were reviewed and the devices' positions in fluoroscopy images and X-rays based on conventional criteria for lead positions and conventional practice for LPs positioning were assessed. The devices' electrical parameters at implant and at the latest device follow-up were used to compare performance between implantation sites.

RESULTS

35.6% of implants were in the apex. 31.1% in mid-septum, 16.7% in apical septum, 15.5% on the septal right ventricular inflow and 1.1% in the septal RV outflow tract. We had no major complications.Thresholds, R-wave amplitudes, and impedance averaged at 0.67 ± 0.41 V, 10.64 ± 5.30 mV, and 777.67 ± 201.67 Ohms, respectively, at the time of implantation, and 0.66 ± 0.39 V, 14.08 ± 6.14 mV, and 564.29 ± 96.76 Ohms at the last device check. There was no difference in the pacing thresholds or impedance between implant sites.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a simple, reproducible way of defining the LP location which can help standardise the assessment of the device location sites across LP implantation centres.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Emphasis on the safety and reliability of the leadless pacemakers in a real-world setting.Establishing the variation in the implantation sites for leadless pacemakers and reporting the effect of the implantation sites on the devices' performance.We propose a simple, reproducible way of defining the LP location which can help standardise the assessment of the device location sites across LP implantation centres.

Leadless pacemaker in heart transplantation: a case report and literature review

Our case demonstrates the safe and effective use of a leadless pacemaker in a heart transplant recipient. A man in his 60s with a history of heart transplantation with biatrial anastomosis 7 months prior presented to the emergency department after several syncopal episodes. Telemetry monitoring revealed a paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block. Given his immunocompromised state and prior dual chamber pacemaker extraction at the time of heart transplantation, the patient underwent successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker. Over the past 5 years since device implantation, the patient has not had any syncopal events nor has he had any device-related complications, such as infection.

Management of Arrhythmias After Heart Transplant: Current State and Considerations for Future Research

Orthotropic heart transplantation remains the most effective therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure, with a median survival of ≈13 years. Yet, a number of complications are observed after orthotropic heart transplantation, including atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Several factors contribute to arrhythmias, such as autonomic denervation, effect of the surgical technique, acute and chronic rejection, and transplant vasculopathy among others. To minimize risk of future arrhythmias, the bicaval technique and minimizing ischemic time are current surgical standards. Sinus node dysfunction is the most common indication for early (within 30 days) pacemaker implantation, whereas atrioventricular block incidence increases as time from transplant increases. Atrial fibrillation can occur in the first few weeks following transplantation but is uncommon in the long term unless secondary to a precipitant such as acute rejection. The most common atrial arrhythmias are atrial flutters, which are mainly typical, but atypical circuits can be observed such as those that involve the remnant donor atrium in regions immediately adjacent to the atrioatrial anastomosis suture line. Choosing the appropriate pharmacological therapy requires careful consideration due to the potential interaction with immunosuppressive agents. Despite historical concerns, adenosine is effective and safe at reduced doses if administered under cardiac monitoring. Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment strategy for symptomatic supraventricular tachycardias, including ablation of atypical flutter circuits. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is an important risk factor for sudden cardiac death, yet the role of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant for sudden death prevention is unclear. Current indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation are as in the nontransplant population. A number of questions for future research are posed.