Abnormal P-wave terminal force in lead V1 is associated with low left atrial appendage ejection velocity

Prognostic significance of atrial cardiopathy in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Introduction:

Whether atrial cardiopathy is associated with stroke prognosis remains unclear. We evaluated the association between atrial cardiopathy markers and outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke using a nationwide prospective registry.

Patients and methods:

Based on the Third China National Stroke Registry, we evaluated different atrial cardiopathy markers including increased P-wave terminal force in V1 (PTFV1), advanced interatrial block (aIAB), prolonged P-wave duration, prolonged P-wave dispersion, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, premature atrial contractions, prolonged PR interval, and severe left atrial enlargement in ischemic stroke patients. The outcomes were death and ischemic stroke recurrence at 1 year. The association between atrial cardiopathy markers and outcomes was analyzed using Cox regression models.

Results:

At 1-year follow-up, 486 (3.4%) patients had died and 1317 (9.3%) patients had experienced ischemic stroke recurrence. After adjustment for clinical risk factors including atrial fibrillation, PTFV1 > 5000 μV·ms (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18–2.45, p = 0.004) and aIAB (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.14–1.91, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with mortality. PTFV1 > 5000 μV·ms was significantly associated with ischemic stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.22–1.96, p = 0.0004). This association was observed although we excluded patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation.

Discussion and Conclusion:

Atrial cardiopathy markers, especially PTFV1 and aIAB, are significantly associated with a higher risk of poor prognosis in patients with ischemic stroke.

Left Atrial Cardiomyopathy - A Challenging Diagnosis

Left atrial cardiomyopathy (LACM) has been an ongoing focus of research for several years. There is evidence that LACM is responsible for atrial fibrillation and embolic strokes of undetermined sources. Therefore, the correct diagnosis of LACM is of clinical importance. Various techniques, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, electroanatomic mapping, genetic testing, and biomarkers, can both identify and quantify structural, mechanical as well as electrical dysfunction in the atria. However, the question arises whether these techniques can reliably diagnose LACM. Because of its heterogeneity, clinical diagnosis is challenging. To date, there are no recommendations for standardized diagnosis of suspected LACM. However, standardization could help to classify LACM more precisely and derive therapeutic directions to improve individual patient management. In addition, uniform diagnostic criteria for LACM could be important for future studies. Combining several parameters and relating them seems beneficial to approach the diagnosis of LACM. This review provides an overview of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis of LACM, in which several potential parameters are discussed and, consequently, a proposal for a diagnostic algorithm is presented.