Relationship between QRS duration and resynchronization window for CRT optimization: Implications for CRT in narrow QRS patients

Determination of sensed and paced atrial-ventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Optimization of atrial-ventricular delay (AVD) during atrial sensing (SAVD) and pacing (PAVD) provides the most effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We demonstrate a novel electrocardiographic methodology for quantifying electrical synchrony and optimizing SAVD/PAVD.

METHODS

We studied 40 CRT patients with LV activation delay. Atrial-sensed to RV-sensed (As-RVs) and atrial-paced to RV-sensed (Ap-RVs) intervals were measured from intracardiac electrograms (IEGM). LV-only pacing was performed over a range of SAVD/PAVD settings. Electrical dyssynchrony (cardiac resynchronization index; CRI) was measured at each setting using a multilead ECG system placed over the anterior and posterior torso. Biventricular pacing, which included multiple interventricular delays, was also conducted in a subset of 10 patients.

RESULTS

When paced LV-only, peak CRI was similar (93 ± 5% vs. 92 ± 5%) during atrial sensing or pacing but optimal PAVD was 61 ± 31 ms greater than optimal SAVD. The difference between As-RVs and Ap-RVs intervals on IEGMs (62 ± 31 ms) was nearly identical. The slope of the correlation line (0.98) and the correlation coefficient r (0.99) comparing the 2 methods of assessing SAVD-PAVD offset were nearly 1 and the y-intercept (0.63 ms) was near 0. During simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing at short AVD, SAVD and PAVD programming did not affect CRI, but CRI was significantly (p < .05) lower during atrial sensing at long AVD.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel methodology for measuring electrical dyssynchrony was used to determine electrically optimal SAVD/PAVD during LV-only pacing. When BiV pacing, shorter AVDs produce better electrical synchrony.

Feasibility study on cardiac resynchronization in the treatment of heart failure by single left bundle branch pacing

To examine the feasibility of single left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by carrying out a frequency adaptive atrioventricular delay (RAAVD) algorithm and automatic optimization of the single left bundle branch pacing atrioventricular interval (AVI) based on the right atrioventricular interval (RAS-RVS). Thirty-six patients with CRT class Ia indications according to the European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines and implanted with RAAVD functional three-chamber pacemakers were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into a single left bundle branch pacing group (n = 21) and a standard biventricular pacing group (n = 15). The optimization of the two groups was performed under standard cardiac colour Doppler ultrasound, followed by the comparison of the QRS width, cardiac function improvement, and echocardiography indicators. The ratio of AVI to the right atrial-right ventricular interval (RAS-RVS) after single LV pacing optimization was defined as the single left bundle branch pacing coefficient (LUBBPε). In comparison to the BVP, the QRS was significantly narrowed (P = 0.017), accompanied by a significantly increased proportion of patients with NYHA class I and II, as well as the 6MWT. Compared with standard biventricular pacing, LVEDD was significantly shortened (P = 0.045), accompanied by significantly improved LAD, AVVTI, EA distance/RR, IVMD, and TS-SD after the operation. RAS-RVS was 156 ± 33 ms, the optimized AVI was 102 ± 10 ms, and LUBBPε was calculated to be 0.66 ± 0.06. Depending on the LUBBPε, a three-chamber pacemaker with a single left bundle branch pacing system was developed based on RAS-RVS-optimized AVI automatically. A three-chamber pacemaker with single left bundle branch pacing can achieve CRT based on RAS-RVS, reaching the optimal AVI of 66% of RAS-RVS.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization in nonresponders and incomplete responders using electrical dyssynchrony mapping

BACKGROUND

Nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) occurs in ∼30%-50% of patients. There are no well-accepted clinical approaches for optimizing CRT in nonresponders.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effect of CRT optimization using electrical dyssynchrony mapping on left ventricular (LV) function, size, and dyssynchrony in selected patients with nonresponse/incomplete response to CRT.

METHODS

We studied 39 patients with underlying left bundle branch block or interventricular conduction delay who had an LV ejection fraction of ≤40% after receiving CRT and had significant electrical dyssynchrony. Electrical dyssynchrony was measured at multiple atrioventricular delays and interventricular delays. The QRS area between combinations of 9 anterior and 9 posterior electrograms (QRS area under the curve) was calculated, and cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) was defined as the percent change in QRS area under the curve compared to native conduction. Electrical dyssynchrony maps depicted CRI over the wide range of settings tested. Patients were programmed to an optimal device setting, and echocardiograms were recorded 5.9 ± 3.7 months postoptimization.

RESULTS

CRI increased from 49.4% ± 24.0% to 90.8% ± 10.5%. CRT optimization significantly improved LV ejection fraction from 31.8% ± 4.7% to 36.3% ± 5.9% (P < .001) and LV end-systolic volume from 108.5 ± 37.6 to 98.0 ± 37.5 mL (P = .009). Speckle-tracking measures of LV strain significantly improved by 2.4% ± 4.5% (transverse; P = .002) and 1.0% ± 2.6% (longitudinal; P = .017). Aortic to pulmonic valve opening time, a measure of interventricular dyssynchrony, significantly (P = .040) decreased by 14.9 ± 39.4 ms.

CONCLUSION

CRT optimization of electrical dyssynchrony using a novel electrical dyssynchrony mapping technology significantly improves LV systolic function, LV end-systolic volume, and mechanical dyssynchrony. This methodology offers a noninvasive, practical clinical approach to treating nonresponders and incomplete responders to CRT.

Electrical dyssynchrony mapping and cardiac resynchronization therapy

PURPOSE

There is no clinical methodology for quantification or display of electrical dyssynchrony over a wide range of atrial-ventricular delays (AVD) and ventricular-ventricular delays (VVD) in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to develop a new methodology, based on wavefront fusion, for mapping electrical synchrony.

METHODS

A cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) was measured at multiple device settings in 90 patients. Electrical dyssynchrony maps (EDM) were constructed for each patient to display CRI at any combination of AVD and VVD. An optimal synchrony line (OSL) depicted the AVD/VVD combinations producing the highest CRIs. Fusion of right ventricular paced (RVp), left ventricular paced (LVp), and native wavefront offsets were calculated.

RESULTS

CRI significantly increased (p < 0.0001) from 58.0 ± 28.1% at baseline to 98.3 ± 1.7% at optimized settings. EDMs in patients with high-grade heart block (n = 20) had an OSL parallel to the simultaneous biventricular pacing (BiVP_VV-SIM) line with leftward shift across all AVDs (RVp-LVp^OFFSET = 50.5 ± 29.8 ms). EDMs in patients with intact AV node conduction (n = 64) had an OSL parallel to the BiVP_VV-SIM line with leftward shift at short AVDs (RVp-LVp^OFFSET = 33.4 ± 23.3 ms), curvilinear at intermediate AVDs (triple fusion), and vertical at long AVDs (native-LVp^OFFSET = 85.2 ± 22.8 ms) in all patients except those with poor LV lead position (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

A new methodology is described for quantifying and graphing electrical dyssynchrony over a physiologic range of AVDs/VVDs. This methodology offers a noninvasive, practical, clinical approach for measuring electrical synchrony that could be applied to optimization of CRT devices.