Electrocardiogram in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Clinical significance and prognostic value of right bundle branch block in permanent pacemaker patients

AIMS

In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with no prior history of heart failure (HF), the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been identified as an independent predictor of HF-related death or hospitalization, while the prognostic significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the long-term risk of all-cause mortality in patients with a standard indication for permanent pacing and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function when RBBB is detected at the time of implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 1348 consecutive patients who had undergone single- or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at the study center, from January 1990 to December 2022. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% or a prior diagnosis of HF were excluded.

RESULTS

The baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed an RBBB in 241 (18%) and an LBBB in 98 (7%) patients. During a median follow-up of 65 [25th-75th percentile: 32-117] months, 704 (52%) patients died. The combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was reached by 173 (13%) patients. On multivariate analysis, RBBB was confirmed as an independent predictor of death [hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.63; P  = 0.005]. However, when considering the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization, this endpoint was independently associated with LBBB (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.38-3.29; P  < 0.001), but not with RBBB.

CONCLUSION

In patients with standard pacemaker indications and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function, the presence of basal RBBB was an independent predictor of mortality. However, it was not associated with the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization.

Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with sickle cell disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have documented that electrocardiography (ECG) can reveal a range of abnormalities, offering valuable insights into the cardiac evaluation of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The objective of this study is to assess the patterns of ECG abnormalities observed in these patients with SCD, and to determine their prevalence.

METHOD

We systematically reviewed the literature using online databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify original studies that reported findings of standard ECG assessments in patients with SCD. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model. Additional analyses including sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted.

RESULTS

Analysis of data from 59 studies involving 897,920 individuals with SCD revealed that 75% of these patients had abnormal ECG findings (67%-81%), which were predominantly nonspecific ST-T changes, left ventricular hypertrophy, T-wave changes, prolonged corrected QT (QTc) interval, and ischemic changes. Besides, it was shown that these patients had significantly higher odds of having any ECG abnormalities (OR of 17.50, 4.68-65.49), right atrial enlargement (6.09, 1.48-25.09), left ventricular hypertrophy (3.45, 1.73-6.89), right ventricular hypertrophy (7.18, 2.28-22.57), biventricular hypertrophy (10.11, 1.99-51.38), prolonged QTc interval (5.54, 2.44-12.59), ST depression (3.34, 1.87-5.97), and T-wave changes (5.41, 1.43-20.56). Moreover, the mean of QTc interval was significantly higher among those with SCD (23.51 milliseconds, 16.08-30.94).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed a higher prevalence of abnormal ECG findings among individuals with SCD. A significant proportion of these patients had various ECG abnormalities, suggesting a potential need for regular ECG assessments for patients with SCD.

Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism-A Case Report and Literature Review

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with an annual incidence of about 1/1000 persons. About every sixth patient dies within the first 30 days after diagnosis. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the first diagnostic tests performed, and is able to confirm the suspicion of PE with typical electrocardiographic signs. Some ECG signs and their regression are also prognostically relevant. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is one option for PE treatment, and aims to relieve right heart strain immediately. The first studies on endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using a dedicated device (FlowTriever System, Inari Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) yielded promising results. Methods: In the following, we report the case of a 66-year-old male patient who presented with New York Heart Association III dyspnea in our emergency department. Among typical clinical and laboratory results, he displayed very impressive electrocardiographic and radiological findings at the time of PE diagnosis. Results: After endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, the patient's complaints and pulmonary hemodynamics improved remarkably. In contrast, the ECG worsened paradoxically 18 h after intervention. Nevertheless, control echocardiography 4 days after the intervention no longer showed any signs of right heart strain, and dyspnea had disappeared completely. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the patient presented as completely symptom-free with a high quality of life. His ECG and echocardiography were normal and excluded recurrent right heart strain. Conclusions: Overall, the patient benefitted remarkably from endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, resulting in an almost complete resolution of electrocardiographic PE signs at the 4-month follow-up after exhibiting multiple typical electrocardiographic PE signs at time of diagnosis and initial electrocardiographic worsening 18 h post successful intervention.

The Early Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Up to 1% of the world population and 10% of all persons over age 65 suffer from pulmonary hypertension (PH). The latency from the first symptom to the diagnosis is more than one year on average, and more than three years in 20% of patients. 40% seek help from more than four different physicians until their condition is finally diagnosed.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search on pulmonary hypertension.

RESULTS

The most common causes of pulmonary hypertension are left heart diseases and lung diseases. Its cardinal symptom is exertional dyspnea that worsens as the disease progresses. Additional symptoms of right heart failure are seen in advanced stages. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are rare, difficult to diagnose, and of particular clinical relevance because specific treatments are available. For this reason, strategies for the early detection of PAH and CTEPH have been developed. The clinical suspicion of PH arises in a patient who has nonspecific symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, and an abnormal (NT-pro-)BNP concentration. Once the suspicion of PH has been confirmed by echocardiography and, if necessary, differential-diagnostic evaluation with a cardiopulmonary stress test, and after the exclusion of a primary left heart disease or lung disease, the patient should be referred to a PH center for further diagnostic assessment, classification, and treatment.

CONCLUSION

If both the (NT-pro-)BNP and the ECG are normal, PH is unlikely. Knowledge of the characteristic clinical manifestations and test results of PH is needed so that patients can be properly selected for referral to specialists and experts in PH.

What changed after the 2022 guidelines for pulmonary hypertension?

With an estimated prevalence of around 1%, pulmonary hypertension (PH) presents a relevant burden worldwide. In this review, we aim to give an overview of the novelties from the revised European Society of Cardiology (ESC) /European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PH and their implication for the everyday clinical practice.

Electrocardiographic manifestations of pulmonary stenosis versus pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular hypertrophy can be caused by conditions such as pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary hypertension. ECG is a readily available and affordable test, the aim of this study was the evaluation of the electrocardiographic aspects of pulmonary stenosis, and pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

A list of patients diagnosed with isolated pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary hypertension patients hospitalized and treated between 2019 and 2021 were extracted from the hospital archives. Furthermore, the ECG of the patients was analyzed in terms of the prevalence of the variables in the study using FECG Caliper software. Finally, the data of 93 patients (in both groups) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, 46 patients were in the severe pulmonary stenosis group, and 49 were in the severe or moderate-to-severe pulmonary hypertension group. The heart rate in the pulmonary hypertension group was significantly higher. R/S > 1 in precordial leads differs between the two groups and higher amplitude R wave in V1(p-value = 0.05). in the pulmonary stenosis group. While in the pulmonary hypertension group, R wave growth occurs later, and this ratio is greater than one after V4. Bundle block in the form of RBBB(p-value <0.001) and maximum QRS duration is more in the pulmonary stenosis group(p-value = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show the different strains of the right ventricle in two groups. It can be concluded that the effects of severe pulmonary stenosis on the ECG are more on the QRS wave and in the form of a block, while severe pulmonary hypertension affects the ST segment and T wave.