Characteristics of the nociceptive withdrawal response elicited under aware and unaware conditions

Clinical neurophysiology of neuropathic pain

Timely and accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is critical for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing treatment delays. According to current standards, the diagnosis of definite neuropathic pain requires objective confirmation of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. This can be provided by specialized neurophysiological techniques as conventional methods like nerve conduction studies and somatosensory evoked potentials may not be sufficient as they do not assess pain pathways. These specialized techniques apply various stimuli, such as thermal, electrical, or mechanical, alongside assessments of spinal/cortical potential or electromyographic reflex recordings. The selection of techniques is guided by the patient's clinical history and examination. The most common neurophysiological tests used in clinical practice are pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) providing an objective evaluation of nociceptive pathways. Four types of PREPs are employed: laser evoked potentials, contact-heat evoked potentials, intra-epidermal electrical stimulation evoked potentials, and pinprick evoked potentials, with the two former ones being the most robust and reliable ones. These techniques investigate small-diameter fibers, primarily Aδ-fibers, and spinothalamic tracts allowing the identification of peripheral or central nervous system lesions. Yet, they are limited in capturing neuronal mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain or in providing objective quantification of pain sensation. Two neurophysiological measures which investigate the pain system beyond its integrity are the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and the N13 component of somatosensory evoked potentials. Both of these methods are more commonly used in research than clinical practice, but they pose interesting approaches to quantify central sensitization, a key underlying mechanism of neuropathic pain. Future investigations in neuropathic pain are therefore warranted.

Stimulus predictability moderates the withdrawal strategy in response to repetitive noxious stimulation in humans

Innate defensive behaviors such as reflexes are found across all species, constituting preprogrammed responses to external threats that are not anticipated. Previous studies indicated that the excitability of the reflex arcs like spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) pathways in humans are modulated by several cognitive factors. This study assesses how the predictability of a threat affects the biomechanical pattern of the withdrawal response, showing that distal and proximal muscles are differentially modulated by descending control.

Movement control in patients with shoulder instability: a comparison between patients after open surgery and nonoperated patients

BACKGROUND

Open surgery to correct shoulder instability is deemed to facilitate recovery of static and dynamic motor functions. Postoperative assessments focus primarily on static outcomes (e.g., repositioning accuracy). We introduce kinematic measures of arm smoothness to assess shoulder patients after open surgery and compare them with nonoperated patients. Performance among both groups of patients was hypothesized to differ. Postsurgery patients were expected to match healthy controls.

METHODS

All participants performed pointing movements with the affected/dominant arm fully extended at fast, preferred, and slow speeds (36 trials per subject). Kinematic data were collected (100 Hz, 3 seconds), and mixed-design analyses of variance (group, speed) were performed with movement time, movement amplitude, acceleration time, and model-observed similarities as dependent variables. Nonparametric tests were performed for number of velocity peaks.

RESULTS

Nonoperated and postsurgery patients showed similarities at preferred and faster movement speeds but not at slower speed. Postsurgery patients were closer to maximally smoothed motion and differed from healthy controls mainly during slow arm movements (closer to maximal smoothness, larger movement amplitude, shorter movement time, and lower number of peaks; i.e., less movement fragmentation).

CONCLUSIONS

Arm kinematic analyses suggest that open surgery stabilizes the shoulder but does not necessarily restore normal movement quality. Patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) seem to implement a "safe" but nonadaptive mode of action whereby preplanned stereotypical movements may be executed without depending on feedback. Rehabilitation of RASI patients should focus on restoring feedback-based movement control. Clinical assessment of RASI patients should include higher order kinematic descriptors.