Normalizing surface electromyographic measures of the masticatory muscles: Comparison of two different methods for clinical purpose

Baseline masticatory muscles' performance may predict pain relief in temporomandibular disorders

OBJECTIVES

To compare masticatory muscles' recruitment in patients with temporomandibular disorders and asymptomatic control subjects. To evaluate if the masticatory muscles' recruitment pattern may predict symptoms' improvement after temporomandibular disorders treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized surface electromyography of anterior temporalis and superficial masseters muscles were recorded and compared at baseline in 26 patients with arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders (study group) and 26 asymptomatic subjects (control group). The study group was treated pharmacologically and by means of five arthrocentesis sessions. Pre-, during-, and post-treatment pain and mandibular function were assessed and compared among timepoints. Clinical improvement in terms of pain and mandibular function was correlated with pre-treatment standardized surface electromyography values.

RESULTS

Temporomandibular disorders patients showed improved maximum mouth opening and pain during and after treatment with arthrocentesis compared to baseline (T-test p < 0.01). Standardized surface electromyography values were significantly different in temporomandibular disorders subjects compared to controls (T-test p < 0.05). Improvement in pain at rest after treatment was inversely correlated with pre-treatment masseters standardized surface electromyography symmetry (R-coefficient 0.3936; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporomandibular disorders patients showed a different muscular recruitment pattern compared to controls. The lesser the pre-treatment masseters symmetry, the greater the improvement of pain at rest after treatment.

Myofunctional orofacial examination tests: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Myofunctional orofacial examination (MOE) is an important tool for the assessment of the stomatognathic system and orofacial functions, and the early diagnosis of orofacial myofunctional disorders. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to scan the literature and determine the most preferred test for myofunctional orofacial examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted to collect information. Pubmed and ScienceDirect database was explored by using keywords gained by MeSH (Medical Subject Headings).

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies were retrived from the search and all of the studies were screened and evaluated regarding the subject, aim, conclusions and the orofacial myofunctional examination test they used. It has been observed that traditional evaluation and inspection methods have been replaced by newer and methodological approaches in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the few tests used differ, 'Orofacial Examination Test With Scores' (OMES) was found to be the most preferred myofunctional orofacial evaluation method from ENT to cardiology.

Signal acquisition and analysis of ambulatory electromyographic recordings for the assessment of sleep bruxism: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory electromyographic (EMG) devices are increasingly being used in sleep bruxism studies. EMG signal acquisition, analysis and scoring methods vary between studies. This may impact comparability of studies and the assessment of sleep bruxism in patients.

OBJECTIVES

(a) To provide an overview of EMG signal acquisition and analysis methods of recordings from limited-channel ambulatory EMG devices for the assessment of sleep bruxism; and (b) to provide an overview of outcome measures used in sleep bruxism literature utilising such devices.

METHOD

A scoping review of the literature was performed. Online databases PubMed and Semantics Scholar were searched for studies published in English until 7 October 2020. Data on five categories were extracted: recording hardware, recording logistics, signal acquisition, signal analysis and sleep bruxism outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight studies were included, published between 1977 and 2020. Recording hardware was generally well described. Reports of participant instructions in device handling and of dealing with failed recordings were often lacking. Basic elements of signal acquisition, for example amplifications factors, impedance and bandpass settings, and signal analysis, for example rectification, signal processing and additional filtering, were underreported. Extensive variability was found for thresholds used to characterise sleep bruxism events. Sleep bruxism outcomes varied, but typically represented frequency, duration and/or intensity of masticatory muscle activity (MMA).

CONCLUSION

Adequate and standardised reporting of recording procedures is highly recommended. In future studies utilising ambulatory EMG devices, the focus may need to shift from the concept of scoring sleep bruxism events to that of scoring the whole spectrum of MMA.

Influence of tongue exercise and orofacial myofunctional status on the electromyographic activity and pain of chronic painful TMD

Objective: To analyze the influence of tongue exercise and myofunctional status on the electromyographic activity (EMG) and pain perception in individuals with chronic painful TMDs.Methods: Twenty-four subjects diagnosed according to the DC/TMD (18-52 years old) were assessed: EMG on the masseter and anterior temporalis; myofunctional orofacial conditions underwent clinical assessment (OMES); and questionnaire for self-perception of TMD signs and symptoms (ProTMDMulti). The 50th percentile was calculated to establish a cutoff value based on OMES scores related to the functional variables of the tongue.Results: The compared groups showed no differences (p > 0.05) in self-perception of their TMD signs and symptoms or in the EMG activity during tongue exercises.Discussion: The myofunctional status of the tongue showed no impact on the painful TMD or on the activity of the masticatory muscles (captured during tongue exercise). The indication of tongue exercises in TMD cases is a safe and adequate possibility.