Lewis lead enhances atrial activity detection in wide QRS tachycardia

The Utility of a Lewis Lead for Distinguishing Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia from Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Objective The Lewis lead configuration is an alternative bipolar chest lead and it can help detect atrial activity. The utility of the Lewis lead to distinguish orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) from typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by visualizing the apparent retrogradely conducted P waves was investigated. Methods Forty-four patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) were included in this study. All patients had PSVT documented by an electrocardiogram (ECG) and underwent an electrophysiological study (EPS). During tachycardia, an ECG recording was performed using a Lewis lead with the electrode on the right aspect of the sternum at the second intercostal space instead of the right arm and the electrode on the fourth intercostal space instead of the left arm. The ECG parameters during tachycardia were compared between AVRT and AVNRT. Results Fourteen patients were diagnosed with AVRTs and 30 with typical AVNRTs on EPS. The positive P wave could be seen in the Lewis lead configuration in 9 of 14 patients with AVRTs and 21 of 30 patients with AVNRTs. P waves were more often visible in the Lewis lead configuration than in the standard leads (66% vs. 45%). The RP interval was significantly longer for AVRTs than for AVNRTs (88±17 vs. 154±34 ms, p<0.001), which yields 89% sensitivity and 71% specificity for distinguishing these 2 tachyarrhythmias with a cut-off point of 100 ms. Conclusion A Lewis lead configuration may help to make an accurate diagnosis among the reentrant supraventricular tachycardias prior to procedures, owing to its ability to locate P waves.

Comparison of standard and Lewis ECG in detection of atrioventricular dissociation in patients with wide QRS tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The atrioventricular (AV) dissociation, which is frequently used in differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia (WQCT), is the most specific finding of ventricular tachycardia (VT) with lower sensitivity. Herein, we aimed to show the importance of Lewis lead ECG records to detect 'visible p waves' during WQCT.

METHOD

A total of 21 consecutive patients who underwent electrophysiologic study (EPS) were included in the study. During EPS, by using a quadripolar diagnostic catheter directed to the right ventricular apex, a fixed stimulus was given and the ventriculoatrial (VA) Wenkebach point was found, and a VT was simulated by a RV apical stimulus at 300ms. The standard and Lewis lead ECG records were taken during this procedure.

RESULT

We detected 'visible p waves' in 7 (33.3%) and 14 (66.7%) patients in the standard and Lewis lead ECG groups, respectively. In terms of the 'visible p waves', there was a statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.022). The sensitivity of standard and Lewis lead ECG in determination of the visible p waves was 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Lewis lead ECG can be more informative about AV dissociation than the standard 12 lead ECG. As a result, we could suggest the assessment of the Lewis lead ECG recording in addition to the standard 12 lead ECG in differential diagnosis of VT in patients with WQCT.

The Lewis Lead for Detection of Ventriculoatrial Conduction Type

BACKGROUND

Identification of a possible ventriculoatrial (VA) dissociation in wide QRS complex tachycardias is one of the most reliable criteria for differentiation of tachycardia origin. The Lewis lead has been proposed for detection of atrial activity during ventricular tachycardias.

HYPOTHESIS

A modified Lewis-lead-ECG will be superior to the standard-lead ECG for detection of ventriculoatrial conduction during ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients underwent electrophysiological study, stimulated with a fixed cycle length of 400 ms in the ventricle. During stimulation, a standard-lead ECG and a modified Lewis-lead ECG were recorded. Simultaneously, VA conduction was documented by intracardiac electrograms. Surface ECGs were presented to 6 blinded examiners for VA conduction assessment.

RESULTS

Type of VA conduction was correctly diagnosed in significantly more ECGs in the Lewis-lead ECG group (mean, 35.0 [75%]) than in the standard-lead ECG group (mean, 29.2 [62%]; P = 0.045). Ventriculoatrial dissociation also was significantly more often correctly diagnosed in the Lewis-lead ECG group (mean, 17.7 [71%]) than in the standard-lead ECG group (mean, 12.7 [49%]; P = 0.014). Interobserver agreement was moderate in both groups (κ = 0.45 and κ = 0.49, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard-lead ECG, modified Lewis-lead ECG is associated with significantly improved detection of VA conduction type during fast ventricular pacing and thus may help improve ECG diagnosis.