1
|
Joarder M, Noureddine El Moussaoui H, Das A, Williamson F, Wullschleger M. Impact of time and distance on outcomes following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings: A scoping review. Injury 2023; 54:1236-1245. [PMID: 36697284 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The last two decades have seen the reintroduction of tourniquets into guidelines for the management of acute limb trauma requiring hemorrhage control. Evidence supporting tourniquet application has demonstrated low complication rates in modern military settings involving rapid evacuation timeframes. It is unclear how these findings translate to patients who have prolonged transport times from injury in rural settings. This scoping review investigates the relationship between time and distance on metabolic complications, limb salvage and mortality following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings. METHODS A systematic search strategy was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and SafetyLit databases. Study characteristics, setting, mechanism of injury, prehospital time, tourniquet time, distance, limb salvage, metabolic response, mortality, and tourniquet removal details were extracted from eligible studies. Descriptive statistics were recorded, and studies were grouped by ischemia time (< 2 h, 2-4 h, or > 4 h). RESULTS The search identified 3103 studies, from which 86 studies were included in this scoping review. Of the 86 studies, 55 studies were primarily in civilian environments and 32 were based in military settings. One study included both settings. Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury sustained by patients in military settings (72.8% [5968/8200]) followed by penetrating injury (23.5% [1926/8200]). In contrast, in civilian settings penetrating injury was the most common mechanism (47.7% [1633/3426]) followed by blunt injury (36.4% [1246/3426]). Tourniquet time was reported in 66/86 studies. Tourniquet time over four hours was associated with reduced limb salvage rates (57.1%) and higher mortality rates (7.1%) compared with a tourniquet time of less than two hours. The overall limb salvage and mortality rates were 69.6% and 6.7% respectively. Metabolic outcomes were reported in 28/86 studies with smaller sample sizes and inconsistencies in which parameters were reported. CONCLUSION This scoping review presents literature describing comparatively safe tourniquet application when used for less than two hours duration. However, there is limited research describing prolonged tourniquet application or when used for protracted distances, such that the impact of tourniquet release time on metabolic outcomes and complications remains unclear. Prospective studies utilizing the development of an international database to provide this dataset is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisah Joarder
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
| | - Hussein Noureddine El Moussaoui
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Arpita Das
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Frances Williamson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia; Trauma Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Martin Wullschleger
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia; Trauma Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gibney BT, Roberts JM, D'Ortenzio RM, Sheikh AM, Nicolaou S, Roberge EA, O'Neill SB. Preventing and Mitigating Radiology System Failures: A Guide to Disaster Planning. Radiographics 2021; 41:2111-2126. [PMID: 34723695 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Disaster planning is a core facet of modern health care practice. Owing to complex infrastructure requirements, radiology departments are vulnerable to system failures that may occur in isolation or during a disaster event when the urgency for and volume of imaging examinations increases. Planning for systems failures helps ensure continuity of service provision and patient care during an adverse event. Hazards to which a radiology department is vulnerable can be identified by applying a systematic approach with recognized tools such as the Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Analysis. Potential critical weaknesses within the department are highlighted by the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis tool. Recognizing the potential latent conditions and active failures that may impact systems allows implementation of strategies to prevent failure or to build resilience and mitigate the effects if they happen. Inherent system resilience to an adverse event can be estimated, and the ability of a department to operate during a disaster and the subsequent recovery can be predicted. The main systems at risk in a radiology department are staff, structure, stuff (supplies and/or equipment), and software, although individual issues and solutions within these are department specific. When medical imaging or examination interpretation needs cannot be met in the radiology department, the use of portable imaging modalities and teleradiology can augment the disaster response. All phases of disaster response planning should consider both sustaining operations and the transition back to normal function. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Gibney
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| | - James M Roberts
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| | - Robert M D'Ortenzio
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| | - Adnan M Sheikh
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| | - Savvas Nicolaou
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| | - Eric A Roberge
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| | - Siobhán B O'Neill
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L5 (B.T.G., J.M.R., R.M.D., A.M.S., S.N., S.B.O.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (R.M.D.); and Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|