Missed opportunities: under-detection of trauma in elderly adults involved in motor vehicle crashes

Challenges in the PREHOSPITAL emergency management of geriatric trauma patients - a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Despite a widely acknowledged increase in older people presenting with traumatic injury in western populations there remains a lack of research into the optimal prehospital management of this vulnerable patient group. Research into this cohort faces many uniqu1e challenges, such as inconsistent definitions, variable physiology, non-linear presentation and multi-morbidity. This scoping review sought to summarise the main challenges in providing prehospital care to older trauma patients to improve the care for this vulnerable group.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A scoping review was performed searching Google Scholar, PubMed and Medline from 2000 until 2020 for literature in English addressing the management of older trauma patients in both the prehospital arena and Emergency Department. A thematic analysis and narrative synthesis was conducted on the included 131 studies. Age-threshold was confirmed by a descriptive analysis from all included studies. The majority of the studies assessed triage and found that recognition and undertriage presented a significant challenge, with adverse effects on mortality. We identified six key challenges in the prehospital field that were summarised in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma in older people is common and challenges prehospital care providers in numerous ways that are difficult to address. Undertriage and the potential for age bias remain prevalent. In this Scoping Review, we identified and discussed six major challenges that are unique to the prehospital environment. More high-quality evidence is needed to investigate this issue further.

Undertriage of the elderly major trauma patient continues in major trauma centre care: a retrospective cohort review

BACKGROUND

Major trauma (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16) in older people is increasing, but concerns persist that major trauma is not always recognised in older patients on triage. This study compared undertriage of older and younger adult major trauma patients in the major trauma centre (MTC) setting to investigate this concern.

METHODS

A retrospective review of Trauma Audit and Research Network data was conducted for three MTCs in the UK for 3 months in 2014. Age, ISS, injury mechanism and injured areas were examined for all severely injured patients (ISS ≥16) and appropriate major trauma triage rates measured via the surrogate markers of trauma team activation and the presence of a consultant first attender, as per standards for major trauma care set by National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Deaths, Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Orthopaedic Association. Trends in older (age ≥65) and younger (ages 18-64) adult major trauma presentation, triage and reception were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 153 severely injured patients, 46 were aged ≥65. Older patients were significantly less likely to receive the attention of a consultant first attender or trauma team. Similar trends were also seen on subgroup analysis by mechanism of injury or number of injured body areas. Older major trauma patients exhibit a higher mortality, despite a lower median ISS (older patient ISS=20 (IQR 16-25), younger patient ISS=25 (IQR 18-29)).

CONCLUSION

Older major trauma patients are at greater risk of undertriage, even in the MTC environment. Existing hospital trauma triage practices should be further investigated to explain and reduce undertriage of elderly trauma patients.

A Novel Risk Score to Predict Post-Trauma Mortality in Nonagenarians

Background:

Nonagenarians represent a rapidly growing age group who often have functional limitations and multiple comorbidities, predisposing them to trauma.

Aims:

The purpose of this study was to identify patient characteristics, hospital complications, and comorbidities that predict in-hospital mortality in the nonagenarian population following trauma. We also sought to create a scoring system using these variables.

Settings and Design:

This study was a retrospective chart review.

Methods:

We reviewed the medical records of 548 nonagenarian trauma patients admitted to two Level I trauma centers from 2006 to 2015. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression and a machine learning model, which calculated significant variables and computed a scoring system.

Results:

The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.1% (n = 39). Significant predictors of mortality were cardiac comorbidity, neuro-concussion, New Injury Severity Score (ISS) 16+, striking an object, ISS 25–75, and pulmonary and cardiac complications. Significant variables were assigned a numeric value. A score of 5+ carried a 41.1% mortality risk, 79% sensitivity, and 91% specificity. A score of 10+ had an associated 81.8% mortality risk with 31% specificity and 99% sensitivity.

Conclusions:

Our findings identified reliable predictors of mortality in nonagenarian population posttrauma. The scoring system performs with good specificity and sensitivity and incrementally correlates with mortality risk.

The damage control sequence in the elderly: Strategy, complexities, and outcomes

Traditional management in cases of exsanguinating abdominal trauma led to poor outcomes in critically injured patients. Because prolonged operations were not well tolerated due to the severe physiologic derangements, an abbreviated laparotomy began to be used. Patients were then resuscitated in the intensive care unit and brought back to the operating room once their physiology had been normalised. This approach has been termed the damage control sequence. Elderly trauma patients are susceptible to significant injury that may mandate a damage control sequence. For myriad reasons, including pre-existing medical conditions, decreased physiologic reserve, and the emergent nature of their injuries, the application of this management approach in the elderly is fraught with challenges. The purpose of this review is to enumerate the damage control sequence, describe the complexities of its use in the elderly, and discuss associated outcomes in this challenging patient population.

The impact of distance on triage to trauma center care in an urban trauma system

BACKGROUND

Urban trauma systems are characterized by high population density, availability of trauma centers, and acceptable road transport times (within 30 minutes). In such systems, patients meeting field trauma triage (FTT) criteria should be transported directly to a trauma center, bypassing closer non-trauma centers.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated emergency medical services (EMS) triage practices to identify opportunities for improving care delivery.

OBJECTIVE

Specifically, we evaluated the effect of the additional distance to a trauma center, compared with a closer non-trauma center, on the noncompliance with trauma destination criteria by EMS personnel in an urban environment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults having at least one physiologic derangement and meeting Toronto EMS field trauma triage criteria from 2005 to 2010. Road travel distances between the site of injury, the closest non-trauma center, and the closest trauma center were estimated using geographic information systems. For patients who were transported to non-trauma centers, we estimated "differential distance": the additional travel distance required to transport directly to a trauma center. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of differential distance on triage decisions, adjusting for other patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria identified 898 patients; 53% were transported directly to a trauma center. Falls, female gender, and age greater than 65 years were associated with transport to non-trauma centers. Differential distances greater than 1 mile were associated with a decreased likelihood of triage to a trauma center.

CONCLUSION

Differential distance between the closest non-trauma center and the closest trauma center was associated with lower compliance with triage protocols, even in an urban setting where trauma centers can be accessed within approximately 30 minutes. Our findings suggest that there are opportunities for reducing the gap between ideal and actual application of field trauma triage guidelines through a process of education and feedback.

Prehospital factors associated with severe injury in older adults

INTRODUCTION

Globally, injury is amongst the leading causes of death and disability in all age groups. Despite the use of prehospital trauma triage guidelines, identification of older persons with severe,potentially life-threatening injuries has been problematic. The purpose of this paper is to review prehospital factors associated with severe injuries amongst older adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using key word searches of natural language and MeSH vocabulary. Criteria for final retention of the articles included: a focus on adults 50 years and older, single or multisystem injury and identification of prehospital (injury scene) factors associated with severe injury. Severe injury was defined as a maximum Abbreviated Injury Score (MAIS) ≥ 3 or an injury severity score ≥ 16, including fatal injury.

RESULTS

The database searches yielded 469 unduplicated citations. Snowball searching yielded an additional 17 citations. Of these 486 citations, 19 research studies and 2 reviews with practice guidelines met the retention criteria. All of the research studies were secondary analyses, involving the use of hospital trauma registries, injury databases, patient medical records, and statewide hospital discharge data. These studies were conducted in the United States (US), Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK).Factors associated with severe injury included age, sex, systolic blood pressure, pulse, Glasgow ComaScale (GCS) score, use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, angle of impact, restraint systems,occupant mobility at the scene, and number of persons injured.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The literature has two significant limitations: the lack of prospective studies of older trauma patient triage indicators and a lack of clarity in many published discussions related to the cause of injury mortality, i.e., whether deaths resulted from the direct effects of the injury or from complications, the effect of comorbidities, or a combination of these. The strongest evidence available at this time consists of retrospective analyses. There might be additional unidentified prehospital factors associated with severe injury in this population that have greater sensitivity, specificity, and predictive validity than current indicators. Seeking and validating such factors and validating existing triage indicators must assume priority amongst investigators and funding agencies.