Protective lung strategies: A cross sectional survey of nurses knowledge and use in the emergency department.
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017;
20:87-91. [PMID:
28268159 DOI:
10.1016/j.aenj.2017.01.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is commonly used in emergency departments (EDs). Protective lung strategies (PLS), comprising of low tidal volume (6mL/kg), control of oxygen and plateau pressures, and administration of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been shown to reduces the risks associated with MV but there is little evidence exists about nurses' knowledge or application of PLS. Our aim was to explore nurses knowledge and application of PLS in Australian EDs.
METHODS
Descriptive, exploratory design utilising an online questionnaire. A convenience sample was recruited via the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia mailing list and secondary snowball sampling was used to optimise response rate.
RESULTS
There were 157 participants. PLS are being used in most EDs (n=104, 75%) and clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are often available (n=86, 62%). Most ED ventilators are capable of implementing PLS, but measurement of plateau pressures was infrequent (n=46%). Participants demonstrate appropriate knowledge, but reported varying levels of confidence and perceived autonomy when implementing PLS in the ED.
CONCLUSION
PLS are being used in Australian EDs, aligning with best available evidence. Nursing staff have good levels of PLS knowledge. Development of an evidence-based CPG may improve confidence when implementing PLS and may pave the way for ED nurses to expand their scope of practice.
Collapse