The incidence of fever in US Critical Care Air Transport Team combat trauma patients evacuated from the theater between March 2009 and March 2010

En Route Critical Care Transfer From a Role 2 to a Role 3 Medical Treatment Facility in Afghanistan

BACKGROUND

En route care is the transfer of patients requiring combat casualty care within the US military evacuation system. No reports have been published about en route care of patients during transfer from a forward surgical facility (role 2) to a combat support hospital (role 3) for comprehensive care.

OBJECTIVE

To describe patients transferred from a role 2 to a role 3 US military treatment facility in Afghanistan.

METHODS

A retrospective review of data from the Joint Trauma System Role 2 Database was conducted. Patient characteristics were described by en route care medical attendants.

RESULTS

More than one-fourth of patients were intubated at transfer (26.9%), although at transfer fewer than 10% of patients had a base deficit of more than 5 (3.5%), a pH of less than 7.3 (5.2%), an international normalized ratio of more than 2 (0.8%), or temporary abdominal or chest closure (7.4%). The en route care medical attendant was most often a nurse (35.5%), followed by technicians (14.1%) and physicians (10.0%). Most patients (75.3%) were transported by medical evacuation (on rotary-wing aircraft).

CONCLUSION

This is the first comprehensive review of patients transported from a forward surgical facility to a more robust combat support hospital in Afghanistan. Understanding the epidemiology of these patients will inform provider training and the appropriate skill mix for the transfer of postsurgical patients within a combat setting.

Impact of Anemia in Critically Ill Burned Casualties Evacuated From Combat Theater via US Military Critical Care Air Transport Teams

BACKGROUND

US military Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT) transport critically ill burn patients out of theater. Blood transfusion may incur adverse effects, and studies report lower hemoglobin (Hgb) value may be safe for critically ill patients. There are no studies evaluating the optimal Hgb value for critically ill burn patients prior to CCATT evacuation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine if critically ill burn casualties with an Hgb of 10 g/dL or less, transported via CCATT, have similar clinical outcomes at 30 days as compared with patients with an Hgb of greater than 10 g/dL.

METHODS

We conducted an institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study involving patients transported via CCATT. We separated our study population into two cohorts based on Hgb levels at the time of theater evacuation: Hgb ≤10 g/dL or Hgb ≥10 g/dL. We compared demographics, injury description, physiologic parameters, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 140 subjects enrolled, 29 were Hgb ≤10, and 111 were Hgb ≥10. Both groups were similar in age and percent total body surface area burned. Those Hgb ≤10 had a higher injury severity score (34 ± 19.8 vs. 25 ± 16.9, P = 0.02) and were more likely to have additional trauma (50% vs. 25%, P = 0.04). Modeling revealed no persistent differences in mortality, and other clinical outcomes measured.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical Care Air Transport Teams transport of critically ill burn patients with an Hgb of 10 g/dL or less had no significant differences in complications or mortality as compared with patients with an Hgb of greater than 10 g/dL. In this study, lower hemoglobin levels did not confer greater risk for worse outcomes.