Not Just Chest Pain: Presenting Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome by Gender: A Research to Practice Summary

A Nationwide Study of Emergency Nurses' Triage Decisions for Potential Acute Coronary Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify the symptoms used to assess angina, determine how emergency nurses make triage decisions for potential acute coronary syndrome, and determine emergency nurses' initial actions.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, survey-based design. Emergency nurses were recruited through a posting on the Emergency Nurses Association website and through postcards. Measures included demographic data, assessment of angina, and the Nurses' Cardiac Triage Instrument. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 414 registered nurses with a mean age of 41.7 (SD = 12.0) years participated. They were predominantly female (80.7%), had a baccalaureate degree (60.1%), and worked as a registered nurse for a median 10.0 years. Common terms used to assess angina were chest pain (79.5%), chest pressure (77.3%), chest tightness (72.9%), and chest discomfort (72.5%). The severity of chest pressure (median 5.0, interquartile range 1.0) and nature of chest pain (median 5.0, interquartile range 1.0) had the highest overall median scores to support initial cardiac triage decisions. Associated symptoms of diaphoresis, fatigue, and shortness of breath along with health history contributed to decision making.

DISCUSSION

Emergency nurses primarily used chest symptoms and health history when deciding to evaluate for acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Associated symptoms of diaphoresis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, along with health history, also contributed to decision making. Initial registered nurse actions were to obtain an electrocardiogram, prepare the patient for the cardiac catheterization laboratory, and notify the emergency physician of the patient's admission.

Absolute Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I at Three Hours After Presentation is Useful for Diagnosing Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department

Background

A rise and/or fall in cardiac troponin value with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit is essential for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) measurements in AMI diagnosis, in terms of the predictability of absolute and relative changes.

Methods

For this retrospective, forward observational study, we enrolled 281 patients older than 18 years who presented with chest pain at the emergency department (ED) between August 2015 and December 2016. The patients were grouped as AMI and non-AMI, and 73 (26%) were diagnosed as having AMI. Hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA) was measured at presentation and 3 hours later. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the absolute and relative changes in hs-cTnI.

Results

The cut-off values to predict AMI were 16.2 ng/L and 42.1% for the absolute and relative hs-cTnI changes, respectively. The area under the curve of hs-cTnI for AMI diagnosis was larger for absolute changes than for relative changes [0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–0.98) vs 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85–0.93)] (P=0.014).

Conclusions

The absolute hs-cTnI change at 3 hours after presentation was superior to the relative change, and a rise and/or fall in hs-cTnI of >16.2 ng/L at 3 hours after presentation was useful to identify AMI in patients presenting at the ED.