Determining Clinical Judgment Among Emergency Nurses During a Complex Simulation

Improving New Graduate Nurse Retention With a Transition to Emergency Nursing Practice Program

INTRODUCTION

Emergency department turnover rates increased at Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center. Most applicants were new graduate registered nurses. A strength, weakness, opportunity, threat analysis revealed 3 weaknesses regarding new graduate registered nurses in emergency departments. Transition to practice program was necessary, new graduate registered nurse competency needed to progress rapidly, and retention rates needed improvement.

METHODS

The emergency department registered nurse transition to practice pathway was created to address these challenges. Retention statistics were garnered through new graduate registered nurses length of employment. Improving retention rates at Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center led to expansion of the program to the other 11 hospitals in the system. Self-report surveys were created later to evaluate the new graduate registered nursess' satisfaction with the program and perception of clinical confidence.

RESULTS

Using the emergency department registered nurse transition to practice pathway, turnover rates at Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center dropped from 46% to 5.1%. Post expansion, the overall program retention rates were 96% at 6 months, and 86% at 1 year. The 2-year retention rate prior to COVID-19 was 82%, afterward, it dropped to 65%. Most surveyed new graduate registered nurses had a confidence level of 25% or less on the first day. After their 17-week orientation, 54% reported confidence levels had risen to 75%. Within 6 months, 81% reported 75% confidence, at 1 year, 87% reported levels between 75% and 100%, and at 2 years, 100% reported a confidence level between 75% and 100%.

DISCUSSION

This development of the emergency department registered nurse transition to practice pathway resulted in improved emergency department registered nurse retention and confidence. Savings from reduced turnover and reduced temporary labor staffing were achieved with this program. Implementation takes careful resource management, ongoing analysis, and research to validate return on investment.

Save Your Back: Comparison of the Compressive Force on the Lower Back Based on Differences in the Training Techniques

INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal injury prevention for nurses is aimed at removing the need to manually position patients. In the ED, this is not always possible or practical. The purpose of this study is to compare the calculated estimated compressive force on the lumbar spine between recommended lifting techniques and the SHAPE lifting method during the horizontal transfer of a patient.

METHODS

Twenty-one student nurses completed the horizontal transfer of a simulated patient while motion was collected using inertial measurement units. Motion data were analyzed to calculate an estimated compressive force on the lumbar spine while completing the movement based on current recommended lifting methods and while using the SHAPE lifting method.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in estimated peak and average compressive force at the lumbar spine was found during both the push and the pull portions (P < .001) of the horizontal transfer.

DISCUSSION

While the optimal way to limit musculoskeletal injury among nurses is to eliminate the need for manual handling of a patient, this is not always possible in the ED. It is critical that when emergency nurses must reposition a patient, they perform the movement in the most biomechanically sound method while using a friction reduction. These findings, coupled with the previous biomechanical risk factor reduction related to the SHAPE lifting intervention, gives promise to a safer lifting strategy for emergency nurses moving forward.

In-situ simulation for nursing students' professional competence development in postanesthesia care: A quasi-experimental study

AIM

To evaluate the differences in professional competence development between nursing students in routine clinical practice and those who experienced four additional in-situ simulations.

BACKGROUND

The amount of clinical practice time available to nursing students is limited. Occasionally, clinical settings do not provide all of the content that nursing students are expected to acquire. In high-risk clinical scenarios, such as the postanesthesia care unit, clinical practice may not provide sufficient context for students to develop the professional competence.

DESIGN

This was a non-blinded, non-randomized, quasi-experimental study. The study was conducted in the postanesthesia care unit of a tertiary hospital in China between April 2021 and December 2022. Nursing students' self-assessed professional competence development and faculty-assessed clinical judgment were used as indicators.

METHODS

A total of 30 final year undergraduate nursing students were divided into two groups according to the time they arrived at the unit for their clinical practice. Nursing students in the control group followed the routine teaching protocol of the unit. Students in the simulation group received four additional in-situ simulations during the second and third weeks of their practice in addition to the routine program. Nursing students self-assessed their postanesthesia care unit professional competence at the end of the first and fourth weeks. At the end of the fourth week, the nursing students were evaluated on their clinical judgment.

RESULTS

Nursing students in both groups scored higher on the professional competence at the end of the fourth week than at the end of the first week and there was a trend of higher competence improvement in the simulation group than in the control group. For clinical judgment, nursing students in the simulation group scored higher than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In-situ simulation contributes to the development of professional competence and clinical judgment of nursing students during their clinical practice in the postanesthesia care unit.