1
|
Robertson EP, Walsh DP, Martin J, Work TM, Kellogg CA, Evans JS, Barker V, Hawthorn A, Aeby G, Paul VJ, Walker BK, Kiryu Y, Woodley CM, Meyer JL, Rosales SM, Studivan M, Moore JF, Brandt ME, Bruckner A. Rapid prototyping for quantifying belief weights of competing hypotheses about emergent diseases. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 337:117668. [PMID: 36958278 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Emerging diseases can have devastating consequences for wildlife and require a rapid response. A critical first step towards developing appropriate management is identifying the etiology of the disease, which can be difficult to determine, particularly early in emergence. Gathering and synthesizing existing information about potential disease causes, by leveraging expert knowledge or relevant existing studies, provides a principled approach to quickly inform decision-making and management efforts. Additionally, updating the current state of knowledge as more information becomes available over time can reduce scientific uncertainty and lead to substantial improvement in the decision-making process and the application of management actions that incorporate and adapt to newly acquired scientific understanding. Here we present a rapid prototyping method for quantifying belief weights for competing hypotheses about the etiology of disease using a combination of formal expert elicitation and Bayesian hierarchical modeling. We illustrate the application of this approach for investigating the etiology of stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) and discuss the opportunities and challenges of this approach for addressing emergent diseases. Lastly, we detail how our work may apply to other pressing management or conservation problems that require quick responses. We found the rapid prototyping methods to be an efficient and rapid means to narrow down the number of potential hypotheses, synthesize current understanding, and help prioritize future studies and experiments. This approach is rapid by providing a snapshot assessment of the current state of knowledge. It can also be updated periodically (e.g., annually) to assess changes in belief weights over time as scientific understanding increases. Synthesis and applications: The rapid prototyping approaches demonstrated here can be used to combine knowledge from multiple experts and/or studies to help with fast decision-making needed for urgent conservation issues including emerging diseases and other management problems that require rapid responses. These approaches can also be used to adjust belief weights over time as studies and expert knowledge accumulate and can be a helpful tool for adapting management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen P Robertson
- Contract Quantitative Ecologist, US Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Daniel P Walsh
- U.S. Geological Survey, Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
| | - Julien Martin
- U.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Laurel, MD, USA.
| | - Thierry M Work
- U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Honolulu Field Station, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Christina A Kellogg
- U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
| | - James S Evans
- U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
| | | | - Aine Hawthorn
- U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center, Western Fisheries Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Greta Aeby
- Smithsonian Marine Station, Fort Pierce, FL, USA
| | | | - Brian K Walker
- Nova Southeastern University, Halmos College of Arts and Sciences, Dania Beach, FL, USA
| | - Yasunari Kiryu
- Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, St. Petersburg, FL, USA
| | - Cheryl M Woodley
- Hollings Marine Laboratory, Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Ocean Service, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Julie L Meyer
- Department of Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie M Rosales
- Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Studivan
- Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer F Moore
- Moore Ecological Analysis and Management, LLC, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn E Brandt
- Center for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, USVI, USA
| | - Andrew Bruckner
- Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, NOAA, Key Largo, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stiller JC, Siemer WF, Perkins KA, Fuller AK. Choosing an optimal duck season: integrating hunter values and duck abundance. WILDLIFE SOC B 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua C. Stiller
- New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 625 Broadway 5th Floor Albany NY 12233 USA
| | - William F. Siemer
- Center for Conservation Social Sciences, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University, Fernow Hall Ithaca NY 14853 USA
| | - Kelly A. Perkins
- New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University, Fernow Hall Ithaca NY 14853 USA
| | - Angela K. Fuller
- U.S. Geological Survey, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment Cornell University, Fernow Hall Ithaca NY 14853 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eaton MJ, Breininger DR, Nichols JD, Fackler PL, McGee S, Smurl M, DeMeyer D, Baker J, Zondervan MB. Integrated hierarchical models to inform management of transitional habitat and the recovery of a habitat specialist. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell J. Eaton
- Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center U.S. Geological Survey North Carolina State University 127 David Clark Labs Raleigh North Carolina27695USA
- Department of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University 127 David Clark Labs Raleigh North Carolina271695USA
| | - David R. Breininger
- Ecological Monitoring Program Nem‐022 NASA Kennedy Space Center Florida32899USA
- Department of Biology University of Central Florida 4110 Libra Drive Orlando Florida32816USA
| | - James D. Nichols
- Patuxent Wildlife Research Center U.S. Geological Survey 12100 Beech Forest Road Laurel Maryland20708USA
| | - Paul L. Fackler
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics North Carolina State University 2801 Founders Drive Raleigh North Carolina27695USA
| | - Samantha McGee
- Florida Department of Environmental Protection 1000 Buffer Preserve Drive Fellsmere Florida32948USA
| | | | - David DeMeyer
- Brevard County Environmentally Endangered Lands Program 6195 North Tropical Trail Merritt Island Florida32953USA
| | - Jonny Baker
- Brevard County Environmentally Endangered Lands Program 444 Columbia Boulevard Titusville Florida32780USA
| | - Maria B. Zondervan
- Bureau of Land Resources St. Johns River Water Management District 25633 County Road 448A Mount Dora Florida32757USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mattsson BJ, Devries JH, Dubovsky JA, Semmens D, Thogmartin WE, Derbridge JJ, Lopez-Hoffman L. Linking landscape-scale conservation to regional and continental outcomes for a migratory species. Sci Rep 2020; 10:4968. [PMID: 32188890 PMCID: PMC7080806 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61058-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Land-use intensification on arable land is expanding and posing a threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services worldwide. We develop methods to link funding for avian breeding habitat conservation and management at landscape scales to equilibrium abundance of a migratory species at the continental scale. We apply this novel approach to a harvested bird valued by birders and hunters in North America, the northern pintail duck (Anas acuta), a species well below its population goal. Based on empirical observations from 2007–2016, habitat conservation investments for waterfowl cost $313 M and affected <2% of the pintail’s primary breeding area in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada. Realistic scenarios for harvest and habitat conservation costing an estimated $588 M (2016 USD) led to predicted pintail population sizes <3 M when assuming average parameter values. Accounting for parameter uncertainty, converting 70–100% of these croplands to idle grassland (cost: $35.7B–50B) is required to achieve the continental population goal of 4 M individuals under the current harvest policy. Using our work as a starting point, we propose continued development of modeling approaches that link conservation funding, habitat delivery, and population response to better integrate conservation efforts and harvest management of economically important migratory species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J Mattsson
- Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, 1180, Austria.
| | - J H Devries
- Ducks Unlimited Canada, Stonewall, MB, R0C2Z0, Canada
| | - J A Dubovsky
- Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood, CO, 80215, USA
| | - D Semmens
- Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, 80225, USA
| | - W E Thogmartin
- Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, WI, 54603, USA
| | - J J Derbridge
- School of Natural Resources and Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA
| | - L Lopez-Hoffman
- School of Natural Resources and Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.,Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson FA, Zimmerman GS, Jensen GH, Clausen KK, Frederiksen M, Madsen J. Using integrated population models for insights into monitoring programs: An application using pink-footed geese. Ecol Modell 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
6
|
Nichols JD, Kendall WL, Boomer GS. Accumulating evidence in ecology: Once is not enough. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:13991-14004. [PMID: 31938497 PMCID: PMC6953668 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Many published studies in ecological science are viewed as stand-alone investigations that purport to provide new insights into how ecological systems behave based on single analyses. But it is rare for results of single studies to provide definitive results, as evidenced in current discussions of the "reproducibility crisis" in science. The key step in science is the comparison of hypothesis-based predictions with observations, where the predictions are typically generated by hypothesis-specific models. Repeating this step allows us to gain confidence in the predictive ability of a model, and its corresponding hypothesis, and thus to accumulate evidence and eventually knowledge. This accumulation may occur via an ad hoc approach, via meta-analyses, or via a more systematic approach based on the anticipated evolution of an information state. We argue the merits of this latter approach, provide an example, and discuss implications for designing sequences of studies focused on a particular question. We conclude by discussing current data collection programs that are preadapted to use this approach and argue that expanded use would increase the rate of learning in ecology, as well as our confidence in what is learned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D. Nichols
- Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterU.S. Geological SurveyLaurelMDUSA
| | - William L. Kendall
- Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitU.S. Geological SurveyFort CollinsCOUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nichols JD. Confronting uncertainty: Contributions of the wildlife profession to the broader scientific community. J Wildl Manage 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James D. Nichols
- U.S. Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelMD 20708USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Williams BK, Brown ED. Double-Loop Learning in Adaptive Management: The Need, the Challenge, and the Opportunity. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2018; 62:995-1006. [PMID: 30269185 PMCID: PMC6244979 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1107-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Adaptive management addresses uncertainty about the processes influencing resource dynamics, as well as the elements of decision making itself. The use of management to reduce both kinds of uncertainty is known as double-loop learning. Though much work has been done on the theory and procedures to address structural uncertainty, there has been less progress in developing an explicit approach for institutional learning about decision elements. Our objective is to describe evidence-based learning about the decision elements, as a complement to the formal "learning by doing" framework for reducing structural uncertainties. Adaptive management is described as a multi-phase approach to management and learning, with a set-up phase of identifying stakeholders, objectives, and other decision elements; an iterative phase that uses these elements in an ongoing cycle of technical learning about system structure and management impacts; and an institutional learning phase involving the periodic reconsideration of the decision elements. We describe a framework for institutional learning that is complementary to that of technical learning, including uncertainty metrics, propagation of change, and mechanisms and consequences of change over time. Operational issues include ways to recognize when the decision elements should be revisited, which elements should be adjusted, and how alternatives can be identified and incorporated based on experience and management performance. We discuss the application of this framework in decision making for renewable natural resources. As important as it is to learn about the processes driving resource dynamics, learning about the elements of the decision architecture is equally, if not more, important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron K Williams
- The Wildlife Society, 425 Barlow Place, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
- Science and Decisions Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20192, USA
| | - Eleanor D Brown
- Science and Decisions Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20192, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holopainen S, Arzel C, Elmberg J, Fox AD, Guillemain M, Gunnarsson G, Nummi P, Sjöberg K, Väänänen VM, Alhainen M, Pöysä H. Sustainable management of migratory European ducks: finding model species. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sari Holopainen
- S. Holopainen , C. Arzel, P. Nummi and V.-M. Väänänen, Dept of Forest S
| | - Céline Arzel
- S. Holopainen , C. Arzel, P. Nummi and V.-M. Väänänen, Dept of Forest S
| | - Johan Elmberg
- J. Elmberg and G. Gunnarsson, Faculty of Science, Kristianstad Univ., Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Anthony D. Fox
- A. D. Fox, Dept of Bioscience, Aarhus Univ., Kalø, Rønde, Denmark
| | - Matthieu Guillemain
- M. Guillemain, Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Unité Avifaune Migratrice, La To
| | - Gunnar Gunnarsson
- J. Elmberg and G. Gunnarsson, Faculty of Science, Kristianstad Univ., Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Petri Nummi
- S. Holopainen , C. Arzel, P. Nummi and V.-M. Väänänen, Dept of Forest S
| | - Kjell Sjöberg
- K. Sjöberg, Dept of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Science
| | | | | | - Hannu Pöysä
- H. Pöysä, Management and Production of Renewable Resources, Natural Resources Inst. Finland, Joensuu
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Roberts A, Eadie JM, Howerter DW, Johnson FA, Nichols JD, Runge MC, Vrtiska MP, Williams BK. Strengthening links between waterfowl research and management. J Wildl Manage 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Roberts
- Division of Migratory Bird Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Laurel MD 20708 USA
| | - John M. Eadie
- Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology; University of California Davis; Davis CA 95616 USA
| | - David W. Howerter
- Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research; Ducks Unlimited Canada; Winnipeg MB ROC 2ZO Canada
| | - Fred A. Johnson
- Wetland and Aquatic Research Center; U.S. Geological Survey; Gainesville FL 32653 USA
| | - James D. Nichols
- Patuxent Wildlife Research Center; U.S. Geological Survey; Laurel MD 20708 USA
| | - Michael C. Runge
- Patuxent Wildlife Research Center; U.S. Geological Survey; Laurel MD 20708 USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hone J, Drake VA, Krebs CJ. Evaluating wildlife management by using principles of applied ecology: case studies and implications. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.1071/wr18006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Context The broad concepts and generalisations that guide conduct of applied ecology, including wildlife management, have been reviewed and synthesised recently into 22 prescriptive and three empirical principles. Aims The aim of this study was to use these principles to evaluate three on-ground wildlife management programs and assess the utility of the principles themselves. Key results Case studies of long-term management of national park biodiversity impacted by feral pigs (Sus scrofa), and of conservation and harvest of red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) and mallards (Anas platyrhnchos), were selected to provide a representative range of management objectives, spatial scales and land tenures, and to include both native and introduced species. Management documents and a considerable scientific literature were available for all three programs. The results highlight similarities and differences among management activities and demonstrate the 25 principles to differing degrees. Most of the prescriptive principles were demonstrated in both the management and the scientific literature in all three programs, but almost no use was made of the three empirical principles. We propose that use of the prescriptive principles constitutes evidence that these programs meet both societal and scientific expectations. However, the limited use of the empirical principles shows gaps in the three programs. Conclusions The results suggest that evaluating other wildlife management programs against the principles of applied ecology is worthwhile and could highlight aspects of those programs that might otherwise be overlooked. Little use was made of the empirical principles, but the the Effort–outcomes principle in particular provides a framework for evaluating management programs. Implications The effort–outcomes relationship should be a focus of future applied research, and both prescriptive and empirical principles should be integrated into wildlife management programs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Janke AK, Anteau MJ, Stafford JD. Long-term spatial heterogeneity in mallard distribution in the Prairie pothole region. WILDLIFE SOC B 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam K. Janke
- Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management; Iowa State University; 339 Science Hall II Ames IA 50011 USA
| | - Michael J. Anteau
- U.S. Geological Survey; Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center; 8711 37th Street Southeast Jamestown ND 58401 USA
| | - Joshua D. Stafford
- U.S. Geological Survey; South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; Department of Natural Resource Management; South Dakota State University; Box 2140 B, Biostress Lab Brookings SD 57007 USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carriger JF, Barron MG, Newman MC. Bayesian Networks Improve Causal Environmental Assessments for Evidence-Based Policy. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2016; 50:13195-13205. [PMID: 27993076 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Rule-based weight of evidence approaches to ecological risk assessment may not account for uncertainties and generally lack probabilistic integration of lines of evidence. Bayesian networks allow causal inferences to be made from evidence by including causal knowledge about the problem, using this knowledge with probabilistic calculus to combine multiple lines of evidence, and minimizing biases in predicting or diagnosing causal relationships. Too often, sources of uncertainty in conventional weight of evidence approaches are ignored that can be accounted for with Bayesian networks. Specifying and propagating uncertainties improve the ability of models to incorporate strength of the evidence in the risk management phase of an assessment. Probabilistic inference from a Bayesian network allows evaluation of changes in uncertainty for variables from the evidence. The network structure and probabilistic framework of a Bayesian approach provide advantages over qualitative approaches in weight of evidence for capturing the impacts of multiple sources of quantifiable uncertainty on predictions of ecological risk. Bayesian networks can facilitate the development of evidence-based policy under conditions of uncertainty by incorporating analytical inaccuracies or the implications of imperfect information, structuring and communicating causal issues through qualitative directed graph formulations, and quantitatively comparing the causal power of multiple stressors on valued ecological resources. These aspects are demonstrated through hypothetical problem scenarios that explore some major benefits of using Bayesian networks for reasoning and making inferences in evidence-based policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Carriger
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Ecology Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, United States
| | - Mace G Barron
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Ecology Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, United States
| | - Michael C Newman
- College of William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, P.O. Box 1346, Route 1208 Greate Road, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Johnson FA, Case DJ, Humburg DD. Learning and adaptation in waterfowl conservation: By chance or by design? WILDLIFE SOC B 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fred A. Johnson
- U.S. Geological Survey; 7920 NW 71 Street Gainesville FL 32653 USA
| | - David J. Case
- DJ Case and Associates; 317 E Jefferson Boulevard Mishawaka IN 46545 USA
| | - Dale D. Humburg
- Ducks Unlimited, Inc.; One Waterfowl Way Memphis TN 38120 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Romañach SS, Benscoter AM, Brandt LA. Value-focused framework for defining landscape-scale conservation targets. J Nat Conserv 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Johnson FA, Fackler PL, Boomer GS, Zimmerman GS, Williams BK, Nichols JD, Dorazio RM. State-Dependent Resource Harvesting with Lagged Information about System States. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0157373. [PMID: 27314852 PMCID: PMC4912162 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Markov decision processes (MDPs), which involve a temporal sequence of actions conditioned on the state of the managed system, are increasingly being applied in natural resource management. This study focuses on the modification of a traditional MDP to account for those cases in which an action must be chosen after a significant time lag in observing system state, but just prior to a new observation. In order to calculate an optimal decision policy under these conditions, possible actions must be conditioned on the previous observed system state and action taken. We show how to solve these problems when the state transition structure is known and when it is uncertain. Our focus is on the latter case, and we show how actions must be conditioned not only on the previous system state and action, but on the probabilities associated with alternative models of system dynamics. To demonstrate this framework, we calculated and simulated optimal, adaptive policies for MDPs with lagged states for the problem of deciding annual harvest regulations for mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in the United States. In this particular example, changes in harvest policy induced by the use of lagged information about system state were sufficient to maintain expected management performance (e.g. population size, harvest) even in the face of an uncertain system state at the time of a decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred A. Johnson
- Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, U. S. Geological Survey, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Paul L. Fackler
- Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - G. Scott Boomer
- Division of Migratory Bird Management, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Guthrie S. Zimmerman
- Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California, United States of America
| | | | - James D. Nichols
- Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Robert M. Dorazio
- Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, U. S. Geological Survey, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Nichols JD, Johnson FA, Williams BK, Boomer GS. On formally integrating science and policy: walking the walk. J Appl Ecol 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Byron K. Williams
- The Wildlife Society; 5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200 Bethesda 20814-2144 MD
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Woodward RT, Tomberlin D. Practical precautionary resource management using robust optimization. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2014; 54:828-839. [PMID: 25117588 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0348-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Uncertainties inherent in fisheries motivate a precautionary approach to management, meaning an approach specifically intended to avoid bad outcomes. Stochastic dynamic optimization models, which have been in the fisheries literature for decades, provide a framework for decision making when uncertain outcomes have known probabilities. However, most such models incorporate population dynamics models for which the parameters are assumed known. In this paper, we apply a robust optimization approach to capture a form of uncertainty nearly universal in fisheries, uncertainty regarding the values of model parameters. Our approach, developed by Nilim and El Ghaoui (Oper Res 53(5):780-798, 2005), establishes bounds on parameter values based on the available data and the degree of precaution that the decision maker chooses. To demonstrate the applicability of the method to fisheries management problems, we use a simple example, the Skeena River sockeye salmon fishery. We show that robust optimization offers a structured and computationally tractable approach to formulating precautionary harvest policies. Moreover, as better information about the resource becomes available, less conservative management is possible without reducing the level of precaution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Woodward
- Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, TAMU 2124, College Station, TX, 77843-2124, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Integrating Land Cover Modeling and Adaptive Management to Conserve Endangered Species and Reduce Catastrophic Fire Risk. LAND 2014. [DOI: 10.3390/land3030874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
22
|
Comparing Path Dependence and Spatial Targeting of Land Use in Implementing Climate Change Responses. LAND 2014. [DOI: 10.3390/land3030850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
23
|
McCarthy KP, Fletcher RJ. Does hunting activity for game species have indirect effects on resource selection by the endangered Florida panther? Anim Conserv 2014. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K. P. McCarthy
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; University of Florida; Gainesville FL USA
| | - R. J. Fletcher
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; University of Florida; Gainesville FL USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Williams BK, Brown ED. Adaptive management: from more talk to real action. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2014; 53:465-79. [PMID: 24271618 PMCID: PMC4544568 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2013] [Accepted: 11/08/2013] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
The challenges currently facing resource managers are large-scale and complex, and demand new approaches to balance development and conservation goals. One approach that shows considerable promise for addressing these challenges is adaptive management, which by now is broadly seen as a natural, intuitive, and potentially effective way to address decision-making in the face of uncertainties. Yet the concept of adaptive management continues to evolve, and its record of success remains limited. In this article, we present an operational framework for adaptive decision-making, and describe the challenges and opportunities in applying it to real-world problems. We discuss the key elements required for adaptive decision-making, and their integration into an iterative process that highlights and distinguishes technical and social learning. We illustrate the elements and processes of the framework with some successful on-the-ground examples of natural resource management. Finally, we address some of the difficulties in applying learning-based management, and finish with a discussion of future directions and strategic challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron K Williams
- Science and Decisions Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20192, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Allen CR, Fontaine JJ, Pope KL, Garmestani AS. Adaptive management for a turbulent future. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2011; 92:1339-45. [PMID: 21168260 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2010] [Accepted: 11/25/2010] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The challenges that face humanity today differ from the past because as the scale of human influence has increased, our biggest challenges have become global in nature, and formerly local problems that could be addressed by shifting populations or switching resources, now aggregate (i.e., "scale up") limiting potential management options. Adaptive management is an approach to natural resource management that emphasizes learning through management based on the philosophy that knowledge is incomplete and much of what we think we know is actually wrong. Adaptive management has explicit structure, including careful elucidation of goals, identification of alternative management objectives and hypotheses of causation, and procedures for the collection of data followed by evaluation and reiteration. It is evident that adaptive management has matured, but it has also reached a crossroads. Practitioners and scientists have developed adaptive management and structured decision making techniques, and mathematicians have developed methods to reduce the uncertainties encountered in resource management, yet there continues to be misapplication of the method and misunderstanding of its purpose. Ironically, the confusion over the term "adaptive management" may stem from the flexibility inherent in the approach, which has resulted in multiple interpretations of "adaptive management" that fall along a continuum of complexity and a priori design. Adaptive management is not a panacea for the navigation of 'wicked problems' as it does not produce easy answers, and is only appropriate in a subset of natural resource management problems where both uncertainty and controllability are high. Nonetheless, the conceptual underpinnings of adaptive management are simple; there will always be inherent uncertainty and unpredictability in the dynamics and behavior of complex social-ecological systems, but management decisions must still be made, and whenever possible, we should incorporate learning into management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig R Allen
- Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, U.S. Geological Survey, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|