1
|
Quantitative Analysis of the Research Trends and Areas in Grassland Remote Sensing: A Scientometrics Analysis of Web of Science from 1980 to 2020. REMOTE SENSING 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/rs13071279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Grassland remote sensing (GRS) is an important research topic that applies remote sensing technology to grassland ecosystems, reflects the number of grassland resources and grassland health promptly, and provides inversion information used in sustainable development management. A scientometrics analysis based on Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) was performed to understand the research trends and areas of focus in GRS research studies. A total of 2692 papers related to GRS research studies and 82,208 references published from 1980 to 2020 were selected as the research objects. A comprehensive overview of the field based on the annual documents, research areas, institutions, influential journals, core authors, and temporal trends in keywords were presented in this study. The results showed that the annual number of documents increased exponentially, and more than 100 papers were published each year since 2010. Remote sensing, environmental sciences, and ecology were the most popular Web of Science research areas. The journal Remote Sensing was one of the most popular for researchers to publish documents and shows high development and publishing potential in GRS research studies. The institution with the greatest research documents and most citations was the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Guo X.L., Hill M.J., and Zhang L. were the most productive authors across the 40-year study period in terms of the number of articles published. Seven clusters of research areas were identified that generated contributions to this topic by keyword co-occurrence analysis. We also detected 17 main future directions of GRS research studies by document co-citation analysis. Emerging or underutilized methodologies and technologies, such as unmanned aerial systems (UASs), cloud computing, and deep learning, will continue to further enhance GRS research in the process of achieving sustainable development goals. These results can help related researchers better understand the past and future of GRS research studies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Runting RK, Bryan BA, Dee LE, Maseyk FJF, Mandle L, Hamel P, Wilson KA, Yetka K, Possingham HP, Rhodes JR. Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2017; 23:28-41. [PMID: 27507077 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 07/03/2016] [Accepted: 07/24/2016] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is having a significant impact on ecosystem services and is likely to become increasingly important as this phenomenon intensifies. Future impacts can be difficult to assess as they often involve long timescales, dynamic systems with high uncertainties, and are typically confounded by other drivers of change. Despite a growing literature on climate change impacts on ecosystem services, no quantitative syntheses exist. Hence, we lack an overarching understanding of the impacts of climate change, how they are being assessed, and the extent to which other drivers, uncertainties, and decision making are incorporated. To address this, we systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change impacts on ecosystem services at subglobal scales. We found that the impact of climate change on most types of services was predominantly negative (59% negative, 24% mixed, 4% neutral, 13% positive), but varied across services, drivers, and assessment methods. Although uncertainty was usually incorporated, there were substantial gaps in the sources of uncertainty included, along with the methods used to incorporate them. We found that relatively few studies integrated decision making, and even fewer studies aimed to identify solutions that were robust to uncertainty. For management or policy to ensure the delivery of ecosystem services, integrated approaches that incorporate multiple drivers of change and account for multiple sources of uncertainty are needed. This is undoubtedly a challenging task, but ignoring these complexities can result in misleading assessments of the impacts of climate change, suboptimal management outcomes, and the inefficient allocation of resources for climate adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca K Runting
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
| | | | - Laura E Dee
- Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | - Fleur J F Maseyk
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
| | - Lisa Mandle
- Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Perrine Hamel
- Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Kerrie A Wilson
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
| | - Kathleen Yetka
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
| | - Hugh P Possingham
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Rhodes
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fürst C, Helming K, Lorz C, Müller F, Verburg PH. Integrated land use and regional resource management--a cross-disciplinary dialogue on future perspectives for a sustainable development of regional resources. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2013; 127 Suppl:S1-S5. [PMID: 23415242 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2012] [Accepted: 12/18/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Our paper introduces objectives and ideas of the special issue "Integrated land use and regional resource management - A cross-disciplinary dialogue on future perspectives for a sustainable development of regional resources" and provides an overview on the contributions of the single papers in the special issue to this topic. Furthermore, we discuss and present major challenges and demands on integrated land use and regional resource management and we come up with an analytical framework how to correspond these demands.
Collapse
|