Regeneration strategies of polymers employed in ex-situ remediation of contaminated soil: Bioregeneration versus solvent extraction

Airlift two-phase partitioning bioreactor for dichloromethane removal: Silicone rubber stimulated biodegradation and its auto-circulation

Solid non-aqueous phases (NAPs), such as silicone rubber, have been used extensively to improve the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, the removal of VOCs is difficult to be further improved because the poor understanding of the mass transfer and reaction processes. Further, the conventional reactors were either complicated or uneconomical. In view of this, herein, an airlift bioreactor with silicone rubber was designed and investigated for dichloromethane (DCM) treatment. The removal efficiency of Reactor 1 (with silicone rubber) was significantly higher than that of Reactor 2 (without silicone rubber), with corresponding higher chloride ion and CO₂ production. It was found that Reactor 1 achieved a much better DCM shock tolerance capability and biomass stability than Reactor 2. Silicone rubber not only enhanced the mass transfer in terms of both gas/liquid and gas/microbial phases, but also decreased the toxicity of DCM to microorganisms. Noteworthily, despite the identical inoculum used, the relative abundance of potential DCM-degrading bacteria in Reactor 1 (91.2%) was much higher than that in Reactor 2 (24.3%) at 216 h. Additionally, the silicone rubber could be automatically circulated in the airlift bioreactor due to the driven effect of the airflow, resulting in a significant reduction of energy consumption.

Self-regenerating tubing bioreactor for removal of toxic substrates: Operational strategies in response to severe dynamic loading conditions

A tubing TPPB (Two-Phase Partitioning Bioreactor) was operated with the objective of verifying the effective treatment of a phenolic synthetic wastewater with simultaneous polymeric tubing bioregeneration by introducing tubing effluent recycle and modifications to the Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT). 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) was employed as the target substrate and the bioreactor was operated for a 3 month period under severe loading conditions (from 77 to 384 mg/L d) with HRT in the tubing in the range of 2-4 h. Tubing effluent recycle (recycle flow rate/influent flow rate ratio = 0.3) was applied when a loss of performance was detected arising from the increased load. For HRT values of 3 and 4 h, almost complete DCP removal was achieved after a few days (1-5) of operation while for the 2 h HRT (i.e. in the most severe loading condition) the DCP removal was ≥97%. A beneficial effect on the process performance arising from recycle application was evident for all the operating conditions investigated, and was confirmed by statistical analysis. Essentially complete polymer bioregeneration was achieved when the bioreactor was operated at the lowest HRT (i.e. 2 h), combined with the application of tubing effluent recycle. The results of this study highlighted several advantages of the tubing TPPB configuration in a comparative analysis of different regeneration options, including the possibility of operating continuously with simultaneous bioregeneration and without the need for additional units or operational steps and extra-energy consumption.

Polymer extraction and ex situ biodegradation of xenobiotic contaminated soil: Modelling of the process concept

An integrated model of a two-step process for the ex situ bioremediation of xenobiotic contaminated soil has been formulated. The process is characterized by an initial extraction step of the organic contaminants from the polluted soil by contact with inexpensive and commercially-available polymer beads, followed by release and biodegradation of the xenobiotics, with parallel polymer bioregeneration, in a Two-Phase Partitioning Bioreactor (TPPB). The regenerated polymer is cyclically reused in the extraction step, so reflecting the robust and otherwise-inert properties of such polymers. The model was calibrated and validated for a soil contaminated with 4-nitrophenol (4NP) and treated with the DuPont polymer Hytrel 8206. In the model calibration, the partition coefficient polymer-soil, P_ps, and the mass transfer coefficient, K, were evaluated, as 105.3 and 0.24 h^-1 respectively. A diffusion coefficient within the polymer of 6.3 10^-8 cm² s^-1 was determined from the fitting of sorption/desorption data. The model was then tested for two alternative process configurations consisting of either one or two soil extraction units, followed by the biodegradation/bioregeneration step. The latter configuration resulted in more effective polymer utilization and is suitable if each extraction step requires a shorter time than the regeneration step. The model predicted that an extraction time of 12 h was sufficient to reach removal efficiencies ≥90% while the biodegradation/bioregeneration step required 24 h to reach efficiencies ≥93%, with a good agreement with experimental data (R² > 0.98 for both cases). The simulation of the process operated with two extraction units showed a better performance with a final concentration ∼0.2 g_4NP kg_ds^-1 vs. 1.69 g_4NP kg_ds^-1 obtained with single extraction unit, for a soil contaminated with 10 g_4NP kg_ds^-1. Corresponding extraction efficiencies were 96 and 83%, respectively.

Towards a continuous two-phase partitioning bioreactor for xenobiotic removal

The removal of a xenobiotic (4-chlorophenol) from contaminated water was investigated in a simulated continuous two-phase partitioning bioreactor (C-TPPB), fitted with coiled tubing comprised of a specifically-selected extruded polymer, Hytrel 8206. Wastewater flowed inside the tubing, the pollutant diffused through the tubing wall, and was removed in the aqueous bioreactor phase at typical biological removal rates in the C-TTPB simulated by varying aqueous phase throughput to the reactor. Operating over a range of influent substrate concentrations (500-1500mgL(-1)) and hydraulic retention times in the tubing (4-8h), overall mass transfer coefficients were 1.7-3.5×10(-7)ms(-1), with the highest value corresponding to the highest tubing flow rate. Corresponding mass transfer rates are of the same order as biological removal rates, and thus do not limit the removal process. The C-TPPB showed good performance over all organic and hydraulic loading ranges, with removal efficiencies of 4CP in the tubing wastewater stream always ≥96%. Additionally, the presence of the Hytrel tubing was able to buffer increases in organic loading to the hybrid system, enhancing overall process stability. Biological testing of the C-TPPB confirmed the abiotic test results demonstrating even higher 4-chlorophenol removal efficiency (∼99%) in the tubing stream.