Migration behavior of impurities during the purification of waste graphite powders

Regulation of high value-added carbon nanomaterials by DC arc plasma using graphite anodes from spent lithium-ion batteries

With the extensive use of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), neglecting to recycle graphite anodes from LIBs leads to environmental pollution and the waste of graphite resources. Thus, developing an efficient and environment-protecting approach to reusing spent graphite anodes is necessary. Here, high value-added graphene sheets (GS), carbon nanohorns (CNHs), fluorine-doped CNHs (F-CNHs), and amorphous carbon nanoballs (ACNs) were prepared from spent graphite anodes of LIBs via DC arc plasma. In order to control the conversion of spent graphite anodes into various carbon nanomaterials, the growth mechanism of carbon nanomaterials is investigated by quenching rate. Benefiting from the extremely high quenching rates (>1.8 × 106 K/s) produced by DC arc plasma, the particle size of the prepared ACNs and CNHs is small and evenly distributed. The CNHs show a "dahlia-like" structure, and the number of graphene layers is only 3-8. Furthermore, the structural transformation mechanism of carbon nanomaterials is researched by deposition temperature. The ACNs, few-layer GS, and CNHs produced by the high quenching rates are unstable and prone to structural transformation. When these carbon nanomaterials are deposited on the cathode surface and cathode holder, the ACNs, "dahlia-like" CNHs, and GS undergo processes of fusing and overlaying at high temperatures, respectively, resulting in the agglomeration and increased particle size of ACNs and "seed-like" CNHs. Meanwhile, the GS is bent and converted into carbon nanocages (CBCs). Overall, the carbon nanomaterials prepared using spent anodes from LIBs by arc plasma are a facile, environment-friendly, and economical strategy to achieve high value-added utilization of the graphite.

Recent Developments on Processes for Recovery of Rhodium Metal from Spent Catalysts

Rhodium (Rh) catalyst has played an indispensable role in many important industrial and technological applications due to its unique and valuable properties. Currently, Rh is considered as a strategic or critical metal as the scarce high-quality purity can only be supplemented by refining coarse ores with low content (2–10 ppm) and is far from meeting the fast-growing market demand. Nowadays, exploring new prospects has already become an urgent issue because of the gradual depletion of Rh resources, incidental pressure on environmental protection, and high market prices. Since waste catalyst materials, industrial equipment, and electronic instruments contain Rh with a higher concentration than that of natural minerals, recovering Rh from scrap not only offers an additional source to satisfy market demand but also reduces the risk of ore over-exploitation. Therefore, the recovery of Rh-based catalysts from scrap is of great significance. This review provides an overview of the Rh metal recovery from spent catalysts. The characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of several current recovery processes, including pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and biosorption technology, are presented and compared. Among them, the hydrometallurgical process is commonly used for Rh recovery from auto catalysts due to its technological simplicity, low cost, and short processing time, but the overall recovery rate is low due to its high remnant Rh within the insoluble residue and the unstable leaching. In contrast, higher Rh recovery and less effluent discharge can be ensured by a pyrometallurgical process which therefore is widely employed in industry to extract precious metals from spent catalysts. However, the related procedure is quite complex, leading to an expensive hardware investment, high energy consumption, long recovery cycles, and inevitable difficulties in controlling contamination in practice. Compared to conventional recovery methods, the biosorption process is considered to be a cost-effective biological route for Rh recovery owing to its intrinsic merits, e.g., low operation costs, small volume, and low amount of chemicals and biological sludge to be treated. Finally, we summarize the challenges and prospect of these three recovery processes in the hope that the community can gain more meaningful and comprehensive insights into Rh recovery.