Methane oxidation and attenuation of sulphur compounds in landfill top cover systems: Lab-scale tests

Methane removal efficiencies of biochar-mediated landfill soil cover with reduced depth

Biochar amendment for landfill soil cover has the potential to enhance methane removal efficiency while minimizing the soil depth. However, there is a lack of information on the response of biochar-mediated soil cover to the changes in configuration and operational parameters during the methane transport and transformation processes. This study constructed three biochar-amended landfill soil covers, with reduced soil depths from 75 cm (C2) to 55 cm (C3) and 45 cm (C4), and the control group (C1) with 75 cm and no biochar. Two operation phases were conducted under two soil moisture contents and three inlet methane fluxes in each phase. The methane removal efficiency increased for all columns along with the increase in methane flux. However, increasing moisture content from 10% to 20% negatively influenced the methane removal efficiency due to mass transfer limitation when at a low inlet methane flux, especially for C1; while this adverse effect could be alleviated by a high flux. Except for the condition with low moisture content and flux combination, C3 showed comparable methane removal efficiency to C2, both dominating over C1. As for C4 with only 45 cm, a high moisture content combined with a high methane flux enabled its methane removal efficiency to be competitive with other soil depths. In addition to the geotechnical reasons for gas transport processes, the evolution in methanotroph community structure (mainly type I methanotrophs) induced by biochar amendment and variations in soil properties supplemented the biological reasons for the varying methane removal efficiencies.

Gas transport in landfill cover system: A critical appraisal

Landfill gas (LFG) emission is gaining more attention from the scientific fraternity and policymakers recently due to its threat to the atmosphere and human health of the populace living in surrounding premises. Though landfill cover (LFC) (viz., daily, intermittent and final cover) is widely used by landfill operators to mitigate or reduce these emissions, their overall performance is still under question. A critical analysis of available literature, primarily pertaining to (i) the composition of the landfill gases and their migration in the LFC system, (ii) experimental and mathematical investigations of the transport mechanism of gas and (iii) the impact of additives to cover soils on transport and fate of gas, has been conducted and presented in this manuscript. Investigation of the efficiency of modified soil was mainly focused on laboratory test. More field tests and application of amended cover soils should be conducted and promoted further. Studies on nitrous oxide and emerging pollutants, including poly-fluoroalkyl substances transport in landfill cover system are limited and need further research. The transport mechanisms of these unconventional contaminants should be considered regarding the selection of LFC materials including geomembrane and geosynthetic clay liners. The existing analytical and numerical models can provide a basic understanding of LFG transport mechanisms and are able to predict the migration behaviour of LFG; however, there are still knowledge gaps concerning the interaction between different species of the gas molecule when modeling multi-component gas transport. Gas transport through fractured cover should also be considered when evaluating LFG emission in the future. Simplified design method for landfill cover system regarding LFG emission based on analytical models should be proposed. Overall, mathematical models combined with experiments can facilitate more visualized and intensive insights, which would be instrumental in devising climate adaptive landfill covers.

Insight into SO4(-II)- dependent anaerobic methane oxidation in landfill: Dual-substrates dynamics model, microbial community, function and metabolic pathway

In anaerobic landfill, SO42- could serve as electron receptor for methane oxidation. In theory, concentrations of both methane and SO42- should be related to methane oxidation rate. However, the dynamics process has yet to be discovered, and the understanding of metabolic pathways of the sulfate-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation (S-DAMO) process in landfill remains limited. In this study, S-DAMO dynamics was investigated by observing the CH4 oxidation rates under different CH4/ SO42-counter-gradients. The CH4-SO42- dual-substrate model based on MichaeliseMenten equation was got (maximum substrate degradation rate Vmax [22.9 ± 1.31] µmol/[kg·d], half-saturation constants [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] ). High-throughput sequencing analysis indicated Methanobacterials, Methanosarcinales, and Soil Crenarchaeotic were the main functional microorganisms for S-DAMO in landfill. The metabolic pathway of S-DAMO was speculated as the reverse methanogenesis pathway through Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUST) analysis, while methanogenesis was the methyl nutrition way based on methanol. The enzymes related to the carbon and sulfur cycles and their relative abundances in the microcosms were analyzed to graph the methane metabolic pathway and the sulfur metabolic pathway. The findings provide important parameters for CH4 mitigation in landfills, and give a new insight for understanding S-DAMO metabolic pathway in landfill.

Landfill site selection using multi criteria decision making: Influential factors for comparing locations

Although a lot of research has focused on energy recovery and recycling of valuable materials from wastes to reduce loads on landfills, landfilling is still an inseparable part of solid waste management. Since landfills potentially pose a risk to human health and the surrounding environment, landfill site selection is an important endeavor that has to be carried out with great care. Choosing a suitable location for landfills depends on several factors and is a complicated procedure. In this paper, a comprehensive review of landfill site selection methods, with an emphasis on multi criteria decision making (multiple criteria decision analysis) has been presented. Assessments indicate that the most frequently used methods are weighted linear combination (WLC), ordered weighted averaging (OWA), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP), TODIM, fuzzy TODIM, analytic network process (ANP), fuzzy-analytic network process (F-ANP), and grey systems theory, each of which is discussed. The most widely used factors for selecting a landfill site are groundwater depth, surface water vicinity, elevation, land slope, soil permeability, soil stability, flooding susceptibility, lithology and stratification, faults, land use type, nearby settlements and urbanization, cultural and protected site vicinity, wind direction, roads, railways, proximity to building materials, pipelines and powerlines, and proximity to airports.

Mitigation of Methane, NMVOCs and Odor Emissions in Active and Passive Biofiltration Systems at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

Biofiltration systems are emerging technological solutions for the removal of methane and odors from landfill gas when flaring is no longer feasible. This work analyzed and compared two full-scale biofiltration systems: biofilter and biowindows. The emission mitigation of methane, non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) and odors during a two-year management and monitoring period was studied. In addition to diluted methane, more than 50 NMVOCs have been detected in the inlet raw landfill gas and the sulfur compounds resulted in the highest odor activity value. Both systems, biofilter and biowindows, were effective for the oxidation of methane (58.1% and 88.05%, respectively), for the mitigation of NMVOCs (higher than 80%) and odor reduction (99.84% and 93.82% respectively). As for the biofilter monitoring, it was possible to define the oxidation efficiency trend and in fact to guarantee that for an oxidation efficiency of 80%, the methane load must be less than 6.5 g CH4/m2h with an oxidation rate of 5.2 g CH4/m2h.

In-situ biodegradation of volatile organic compounds in landfill by sewage sludge modified waste-char

VOCs are the major harmful pollutants released from MSW landfills, which are toxicity to human health. In order to in-situ biodegradation of VOCs released from landfill, two novel laboratory-scale biocovers, including waste-char obtained from MSW pyrolysis (WC), and sewage sludge modified the WC (SWC), are used to degradate VOCs. The removal performances of VOCs as well as the bacterial community in the WC and SWC are investigated in a simulated landfill systems with the contrast experiment of a landfill cover soil (LCS) for 60 days. Meanwhile, the adsorption-biodegradation of VOCs model compounds over the LCS, WC, and SWC are also tested in fixed-bed adsorption reactor and in-situ FTIR. The VOCs removal efficiencies by the SWC are maintained above 85% for a long-term, much higher than that of the LCS and WC. The higher removal efficiencies and long-term stability for VOCs degradation in SWC are attributed to a strongly positive synergistic between adsorption and biodegradation that the gaseous VOCs released from MSW is effectively adsorbed by the SWC due to its higher VOCs adsorption capacity, and then the adsorbed-VOCs is converted into CO₂ and H₂O by the microorganisms that consuming the adsorbed-VOCs as energy and carbon sources. Subsequently, the decrease of the adsorbed-VOCs in SWC would also promote the transformation of the gaseous VOCs into the adsorbed VOCs and accelerate the growth of microorganisms by taking the adsorbed-VOCs as the energy and carbon source, resulted in a higher adsorption rate and degradation rate for VOCs.

In-situ biodegradation of harmful pollutants in landfill by sludge modified biochar used as biocover

MSW landfill releases a lot of harmful pollutants such as H₂S, NH₃, and VOCs. In this study, two laboratory-scale biocovers such as biochar (BC) derived from agricultural & forestry wastes (AFW) pyrolysis, and sludge modified the biochar (SBC) were designed and used to remove the harmful pollutants. In order to understand in-situ biodegradation mechanism of the harmful pollutants by the SBC, the removal performances of the harmful pollutants together with the bacterial community in the BC and SBC were investigated in simulated landfill systems for 60 days comparing with the contrast experiment of a landfill cover soil (LCS). Meanwhile, the adsorption capacities of representative harmful pollutants (hydrogen sulfide, toluene, acetone and chlorobenzene) in the LCS, BC, and SBC were also tested in a fixed bed reactor. The removal efficiencies of the harmful pollutants by the SBC ranged from 95.43% to 100.00%, which was much higher than that of the LCS. The adsorption capacities of the harmful pollutants in the SBC were 4 times higher than that of the LCS since the SBC exhibited higher BET surface and N-containing functional groups. Meanwhile, the biodegradation rates of the harmful pollutants in the SBC were also much higher than that of the LCS since the populations of the bacterial community in the SBC were more abundant due to its facilitating the growth and activity of microorganisms in the porous structure of the SBC. In addition, a synergistic combination of adsorption and biodegradation in the SBC that enhanced the reproduction rate of microorganisms by consuming the absorbed-pollutants as carbon sources, which also contributed to enhance the biodegradation rates of the harmful pollutants.

Comparison of the methane-oxidizing capacity of landfill cover soil amended with biochar produced using different pyrolysis temperatures

The in-situ mitigation of methane (CH₄) in landfill gas using landfill cover soil (LCS) is a cost-effective approach, but its efficiency needs to be enhanced. In this study, we incorporated an enriched methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) consortium into LCS and established four biochar-amended LCS groups with biochar produced at 300 °C (BC300), 400 °C (BC400), 500 °C (BC500), and 600 °C (BC600). The purpose was to evaluate the CH₄ oxidation capacity of biochar-amended LCS after inoculation with MOB and to investigate how the physicochemical properties of biochar that are influenced by the pyrolysis temperature affect the performance and microbial activity of biochar-amended LCS. It was found that a 15% volume ratio (representing a mass ratio of 2.49%-2.78%) for biochar amendment in LCS enhanced CH₄ removal efficiency, with the highest removal observed to be 46% for BC400-amended LCS compared to 30% for the original LCS. In addition, CH₄ adsorption by the biochar was not observed, and a 15% mass ratio for biochar in the LCS had no or a negative impact. Besides improving the water-holding capacity and gas permeability of LCS, other possible advantages of biochar amendment in terms of CH₄ oxidization include greater retention of nutrients, electron acceptors, and exchangeable cations, as well as introducing iron ions. It was also found that CH₄ oxidation capacity and the methanotroph activity of biochar-amended LCS did not continue to increase with higher pyrolysis temperatures, even though higher micropore volumes and surface areas were obtained at higher pyrolysis temperatures. From this study, BC400 was identified as the optimal choice for the best performance in terms of enhancing both the CH₄ oxidation capacity of the amended LCS and the growth of type II methanotroph Methylocystaceae, which can possibly be attributed to having the highest cation exchange capacity of the four biochars.

Biosolids and sludge management

The advancements in the field of sludge and biosolids have been made over the past year. This review outlines the major contributions of researchers that have been published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings throughout 2018. The review is organized in sections including regulatory developments and market analysis; analysis and quantification of characteristics including microconstituents and metals; treatment advances for the conversion of sludge to biosolids including pretreatment and sludge minimization, conditioning and dewatering, digestion, composting, and innovative technologies; product development and reuse including adsorbents and thermal products, agricultural and other uses, and innovative uses; odor and air emissions; and energy factors. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Summary of advances in the field of residuals and biosolids research in 2018. This review outlines the major contributions of researchers that have been published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. Topics covered range from regulation to innovation.