Environmental Mn(II) enhances the activity of dissimilatory arsenate-respiring prokaryotes from arsenic-contaminated soils

Can Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryote also oxidize As(III) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and vice versa?

Sb(III) and As(III) share similar chemical features and coexist in the environment. However, their oxidase enzymes have completely different sequences and structures. This raises an intriguing question: Could Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (SOPs) also oxidize As(III), and vice versa? Regarding this issue, previous investigations have yielded unclear, incorrect and even conflicting data. This work aims to address this matter. First, we prepared an enriched population of SOPs that comprises 55 different AnoA genes, lacking AioAB and ArxAB genes. We found that these SOPs can oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) with comparable capabilities. To further confirm this finding, we isolated three cultivable SOP strains that have AnoA gene, but lack AioAB and ArxAB genes. We observed that they also oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Secondly, we obtained an enriched population of As(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (AOPs) from As-contaminated soils, which comprises 69 different AioA genes, lacking AnoA gene. We observed that the AOP population has significant As(III)-oxidizing activities, but lack detectable Sb(III)-oxidizing activities under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Therefore, we convincingly show that SOPs can oxidize As(III), but AOPs cannot oxidize Sb(III). These findings clarify the previous ambiguities, confusion, errors or contradictions regarding how SOPs and AOPs oxidize each other's substrate.

Biological oxidation of As(III) and Sb(III) by a novel bacterium with Sb(III) oxidase rather than As(III) oxidase under anaerobic and aerobic conditions

Sb and As are chemically similar, but the sequences and structures of Sb(III) and As(III) oxidase are totally distinct. It is thus interesting to explore whether Sb(III) oxidase oxidizes As(III), and if so, how microbial oxidations of Sb(III) and As(III) influence one another. Previous investigations have yielded ambiguous or even erroneous conclusions. This study aimed to clarify this issue. Firstly, we prepared a consortium of Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (SOPs) by enrichment cultivation. Metagenomic analysis reveals that SOPs with the Sb(III) oxidase gene, but lacking the As(III) oxidase gene are predominant in the SOP community. Despite this, SOPs exhibit comparable Sb(III) and As(III)-oxidizing activities in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, indicating that at the microbial community level, Sb(III) oxidase can oxidize As(III). Secondly, we isolated a representative cultivable SOP, Ralstonia sp. SbOX with Sb(III) oxidase gene but without As(III) oxidase gene. Genomic analysis of SbOX reveals that this SOP strain has a complete Sb(III) oxidase (AnoA) gene, but lacks As(III) oxidase (AioAB or ArxAB) gene. It is interesting to discover that, besides its Sb(III) oxidation activities, SbOX also exhibits significant capabilities in oxidizing As(III) under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Moreover, under aerobic conditions and in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III), SbOX exhibited a preference for oxidizing Sb(III). Only after the near complete oxidation of Sb(III) did SbOX initiate rapid oxidation of As(III). In contrast, under anaerobic conditions and in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III), Sb(III) oxidation notably inhibited the As(III) oxidation pathway in SbOX, while As(III) exhibited minimal effects on the Sb(III) oxidation. These findings suggest that SOPs can oxidize As(III) under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, exhibiting a strong preference for Sb(III) over As(III) oxidation in the presence of both. This study unveils a novel mechanism of interaction within the Sb and As biogeochemical cycles.

Functional features of a novel Sb(III)- and As(III)-oxidizing bacterium: Implications for the interactions between bacterial Sb(III) and As(III) oxidation pathways

Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) share similar chemical characteristics and commonly coexist in contaminated environments. It has been reported that the biogeochemical cycles of antimony and arsenic affect each other. However, there is limited understanding regarding microbial coupling between the biogeochemical processes of antimony and arsenic. Here, we aimed to solve this issue. We successfully isolated a novel bacterium, Shinella sp. SbAsOP1, which possesses both Sb(III) and As(III) oxidase, and can effectively oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. SbAsOP1 exhibits greater aerobic oxidation activity for the oxidation of As(III) or Sb(III) compared to its anaerobic activity. SbAsOP1 also significantly catalyzes the oxidative mobilization of solid-phase Sb(III) under aerobic conditions. The activity of SbAsOP1 in oxidizing solid Sb(III) is 3 times lower than its activity in oxidizing soluble form. It is noteworthy that, in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III) under aerobic conditions, either As(III) or Sb(III) significantly inhibits the oxidation of Sb(III) or As(III), respectively. In comparison, under anaerobic conditions and in the coexistence of Sb(III) and As(III), As(III) significantly inhibits Sb(III) oxidation, whereas Sb(III) almost completely inhibits As(III) oxidation. These findings suggest that under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, SbAsOP1 demonstrates a partial preference for Sb(III) oxidation. Additionally, bacterial oxidations of Sb(III) and As(III) mutually inhibit each other to varying degrees. These observations gain a novel understanding of the interplay between the biogeochemical processes of antimony and arsenic.

Contradictory Impacts of Nitrate on the Dissimilatory Arsenate-Respiring Prokaryotes-Induced Reductive Mobilization of Arsenic from Contaminated Sediments: Mechanism Insight from Metagenomic and Functional Analyses

Dissimilatory arsenate-respiring prokaryotes (DARPs) are considered to be a key impetus of the reductive dissolution of solid-phase arsenic. However, little is known about the interaction between nitrate and DARPs so far. In this study, we showed that nitrate either inhibited or promoted the DARP population-catalyzed reductive mobilization of As in sediments. Metagenomic analysis of the microbial communities in the microcosms after seven days of As release assays suggested that microbes mainly consisted of: Type-I DARPs having potential to reduce NO3- into NO2- and Type-II DARPs having potential to reduce NO3- to NH4+. We further isolated two cultivable DARPs, Neobacillus sp. A01 and Paenibacillus sp. A02, which represent Type-I and -II DARPs, respectively. We observed that nitrate suppressed A01-mediated release of As(III) but promoted A02-mediated release of As(III). Furthermore, we demonstrated that this observation was due to the fact that nitrite, the end product of incomplete denitrification by Type-I DARPs, suppressed the arrA gene expression per cell and growth of all DARPs, whereas ammonium, the end product of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) by Type-II DARPs, enhanced the arrA gene expression per cell and significantly promoted the growth of all DARPs. These findings suggest that the actual effects of nitrate on DARP population-catalyzed reductive mobilization of arsenic, largely depend on the ratio of Type-I to Type-II DARPs in sediments.