Equine Lyme Disease

Knowledge and perception of equine ticks and tick-borne diseases of Pennsylvania horse owners and caretakers

There is limited data on current knowledge of Pennsylvania horse caretakers on tick-borne diseases (TBDs), tick identification, and tick management practices. This study aimed to determine tick knowledge, concern, and management among Pennsylvania equine caretakers using an online survey. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze data. The survey received 894 responses (539 completed) from Pennsylvania equine owners and caretakers. The largest proportion of respondents cared for 3-5 horses (31 %), followed by 2 horses (27 %). Veterinarian-confirmed diagnosis rates of two TBDs, Lyme disease and anaplasmosis, were 38 % and 22 %, respectively. Most respondents (39 %) were moderately confident in recognizing Lyme disease, while most (44 %) were not confident at all in recognizing anaplasmosis. Most respondents (69 %) were either extremely or very concerned about their horses contracting any TBDs. Tick bite and TBD prevention methods used by equine caretakers included performing tick checks, using on-animal repellents, and conducting pasture/landscape management. Ten knowledge-based questions were asked, and the mean correct score was 3.97 ± 2.18 out of 10 possible points. There were significant positive associations between higher knowledge scores and previous veterinarian-confirmed equine Lyme disease diagnosis, higher concern level of TBDs, and higher frequency of tick checks. With increased equine TBD prevalence and high levels of horse owner concern about TBD, Extension educators should focus on teaching about TBDs and managing ticks on horses and farms.

Comparative evaluation of Borrelia burgdorferi antibody detection between the VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus

Two studies were developed to compare Borrelia burgdorferi antibody detection between the VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus tests. The objective of the first study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of VetScan Flex4 and SNAP 4Dx Plus B. burgdorferi results using field sourced samples compared to a Western Blot reference method. The sensitivity and specificity of VetScan Flex4 were 81.9 % (95 % CI: 71.9 %-89.5 %) and 89.3 % (95 % CI: 85.2 %-92.9 %) respectively, and SNAP 4Dx Plus's sensitivity and specificity were 80.7 % (95 % CI: 70.6 %-88.6 %) and 92.8 % (95 % CI: 89.1 %-95.5 %) respectively. When comparing VetScan Flex4 and Snap 4Dx Plus, the Simple Kappa Coefficient estimate was 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.84) indicating substantial agreement between the two methods. McNemar's Test revealed concordance between the two methods was not statistically significant (P = 0.05). The objective of the second study was to evaluate whether VetScan Flex4 differentiates between B. burgdorferi antibodies derived from infection versus vaccination with commonly used canine Lyme vaccines. The sensitivity and specificity of the VetScan Flex4 in differentiating canine Lyme vaccination from infection with Borrelia burgdorferi were 100 % (Se 95 % CI: 78.2 %-100 %; Sp 95 % CI: 91.2 %-100 %). In conclusion, the VetScan Flex4 is a reliably sensitive and specific point-of-care test that is similar to Snap 4Dx Plus, can differentiate between infection and Lyme vaccination, and can be utilized by veterinarians for Lyme disease diagnosis and surveillance of B. burgdorferi exposure.

Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infections in German Horses

There are limited data on Lyme borreliosis (LB), a tick-borne disease caused by the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex, in horses. Seropositivity is not necessarily associated with clinical disease. Data on seropositivity against Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in German horses are sparse. Therefore, serum samples from horses (n = 123) suspected of having Lyme borreliosis and clinically healthy horses (n = 113) from the same stables were tested for specific antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. The samples were screened for antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi (ELISA and an IgG line immunoblot assay). Furthermore, the samples were examined for antibodies against B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum with a validated rapid in-house test (SNAP^® 4Dx Plus^® ELISA). The clinical signs of suspect horses included lameness (n = 36), poor performance (n = 19), and apathy (n = 12). Twenty-three percent (n = 26) of suspect horses and 17% (n = 18) of clinically healthy horses were seropositive for having a Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato infection (p = 0.371), showing that the detection of specific antibodies against B. burgdorferi alone is not sufficient for a diagnosis of equine LB. Anaplasma phagocytophilum seropositivity and seropositivity against both pathogens was 20%/6% in suspect horses and 16%/2% in the clinically healthy population, showing only minor differences (p = 0.108). Unspecific testing for antibodies against B. burgdorferi without clinical suspicion of Lyme borreliosis is not recommended since the clinical relevance of seropositivity against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato remains to be elucidated.

Tierärztliches Meinungsbild zur Equinen Lyme-Borreliose – Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie

Ziel Erfassung des tierärztlichen Meinungsbildes zur Equinen Lyme-Borreliose

Material und Methoden Durch eine Befragung wurde untersucht, wie Pferdetierärzte die Bedeutung positiver serologischer Nachweise gegen Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb-AK) und einer klinisch manifesten Lyme-Borreliose (LB) einschätzten sowie letztere diagnostizieren und therapieren.

Ergebnisse Der Fragebogen wurde von 73 Tierärzten (TÄ) ausgefüllt. 48 % der TÄ erhoben nur sehr selten bis gar keine serologischen Bb-AK-Nachweise bei Pferden in ihrer Praxis, 47 % stellten gelegentlich Bb-AK fest und nur 5 % fanden häufig Bb-AK-Nachweise. 51 % der TÄ bestätigen, dass sie bereits klinisch-manifeste LB-Erkrankungen festgestellt hätten, während 43 % die Existenz dieser Erkrankung zwar nicht ausschlossen, aber selber keine Equine Lyme-Borreliose Fälle gesehen haben. 6 % der TÄ zweifeln die Existenz einer klinischen LB beim Pferd generell an.

Im Durchschnitt wurden 159-mal im Jahr weiterführende diagnostische Maßnahmen im Hinblick auf eine LB eingeleitet, und es wurden 1,4 ± 1,0 Fälle von equiner LB im Jahr diagnostiziert. Als Untersuchungsmethoden zur Abklärung von Borreliose-Verdachtsfällen verwendeten 68 % der TÄ den „indirekten Erregernachweis“, 27 % sowohl den direkten als auch den indirekten Erregernachweis und 5 % verwendeten ausschließlich den direkten Erregernachweis. Bei letzterem wurden am häufigsten Blut und Hautstanzen als Probenmaterial eingesandt.

Die Behandlung von Pferden mit auf eine Borrelioseerkrankung hinweisenden Laborergebnissen und als passend bewerteter, klinischer Symptomatik erfolgte durch 93 % der Tierärzte mit Antibiotika und 7 % mit Homöopathie. Am häufigsten wurde Doxycyclin (68 %) eingesetzt. Dabei erfolgte die antibiotische Behandlung über einen Zeitraum von 3 (31 %) bis 4 (63 %) Wochen.

In Bezug auf eine mögliche Impfung der Pferde gegen Borreliose boten 39 % der Tierärzte diese Impfung nicht an, bei 20 % wurde sie noch nicht eingesetzt, aber auch nicht kategorisch abgelehnt und 41 % führten regelmäßig Borreliose-Impfungen durch.

Schlussfolgerung und klinische Relevanz Das Meinungsbild von praktizierenden Pferdetierärztinnen und Pferdetierärzten in Deutschland zur klinischen Relevanz der equinen LB ist sehr heterogen. Einheitliche Richtlinien hinsichtlich Diagnostik- und evtl. auch Therapieempfehlungen wären sinnvoll, um der Unsicherheit in der Tierärzteschaft entgegenzuwirken.

Tick-borne zoonoses and commonly used diagnostic methods in human and veterinary medicine

Around the world, human health and animal health are closely linked in terms of the One Health concept by ticks acting as vectors for zoonotic pathogens. Animals do not only maintain tick cycles but can either be clinically affected by the same tick-borne pathogens as humans and/or play a role as reservoirs or sentinel pathogen hosts. However, the relevance of different tick-borne diseases (TBDs) may vary in human vs. veterinary medicine, which is consequently reflected by the availability of human vs. veterinary diagnostic tests. Yet, as TBDs gain importance in both fields and rare zoonotic pathogens, such as Babesia spp., are increasingly identified as causes of human disease, a One Health approach regarding development of new diagnostic tools may lead to synergistic benefits. This review gives an overview on zoonotic protozoan, bacterial and viral tick-borne pathogens worldwide, discusses commonly used diagnostic techniques for TBDs, and compares commercial availability of diagnostic tests for humans vs. domestic animals, using Germany as an example, with the aim of highlighting existing gaps and opportunities for collaboration in a One Health framework.

Zoonotic Tick-Borne Pathogens in Temperate and Cold Regions of Europe-A Review on the Prevalence in Domestic Animals

Ticks transmit a variety of pathogens affecting both human and animal health. In temperate and cold regions of Europe (Western, Central, Eastern, and Northern Europe), the most relevant zoonotic tick-borne pathogens are tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), Borrelia spp. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. More rarely, Rickettsia spp., Neoehrlichia mikurensis, and zoonotic Babesia spp. are identified as a cause of human disease. Domestic animals may also be clinically affected by these pathogens, and, furthermore, can be regarded as sentinel hosts for their occurrence in a certain area, or even play a role as reservoirs or amplifying hosts. For example, viraemic ruminants may transmit TBEV to humans via raw milk products. This review summarizes the role of domestic animals, including ruminants, horses, dogs, and cats, in the ecology of TBEV, Borrelia spp., A. phagocytophilum, Rickettsia spp., N. mikurensis, and zoonotic Babesia species. It gives an overview on the (sero-)prevalence of these infectious agents in domestic animals in temperate/cold regions of Europe, based on 148 individual prevalence studies. Meta-analyses of seroprevalence in asymptomatic animals estimated an overall seroprevalence of 2.7% for TBEV, 12.9% for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), 16.2% for A. phagocytophilum and 7.4% for Babesia divergens, with a high level of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses with regard to animal species, diagnostic test, geographical region and decade of sampling were mostly non-significant, with the exception of significantly lower B. burgdorferi s.l. seroprevalences in dogs than in horses and cattle. More surveillance studies employing highly sensitive and specific test methods and including hitherto non-investigated regions are needed to determine if and how global changes in terms of climate, land use, agricultural practices and human behavior impact the frequency of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in domestic animals.

A Pilot Serosurvey for Selected Pathogens in Feral Donkeys (Equus asinus)

Simple Summary

This study aimed to assess the pathogen exposure status of recently captured feral donkeys from Death Valley National Park, California. Assays to detect the presence of antibodies to equine herpesvirus 1, equine influenza virus, West Nile virus, and Borrelia burgdorferi (the causative agent of Lyme disease) were performed on serum samples from these feral donkeys. The results indicate that this population is mostly naïve and likely susceptible to these common equid pathogens upon removal from the wild.

Abstract

Recent removal and relocation of feral donkeys from vast public lands to more concentrated holding pens, training facilities, and offsite adoption locations raises several health and welfare concerns. Very little is known regarding the common equid pathogens that are circulating within the feral donkey population in and around Death Valley National Park, California, USA. The aim of this study was to utilize serologic assays to assess previous exposure of these donkeys to equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1), equine influenza (EIV), West Nile virus (WNV), and Borrelia burgdorferi (the causative agent of Lyme disease). The results of this study indicate that this feral equid population is mostly naïve and likely susceptible to these common equid pathogens upon removal from the wild.

Modelling the probability and impact of false-positive serology for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: A case study

Background

Serological screening tests for Lyme borreliosis have poor specificity, with potential for misdiagnosis and unnecessary antimicrobial treatment.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of Lyme borreliosis seroprevalence and serologic test characteristics on the probability of obtaining a false‐positive result and impact on antimicrobial use.

Study design

Cross‐sectional serological survey and modelling.

Methods

Sera from 303 horses in southern Belgium were analysed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Apparent seroprevalence was derived from serological data and a Bayesian estimate of true seroprevalence was computed. These were a starting point to model the impact of test and population characteristics on the probability of obtaining false‐positive results and consequently unnecessary treatments and complications.

Results

Apparent and true seroprevalence were 22% (95% CI 18%‐27%) and 11% (credible interval with 95% probability 0.6%‐21%) respectively. We estimate that two‐thirds of positive samples are false positive in southern Belgium, with one in five of tested horses potentially misdiagnosed as infected. Around 5% of antimicrobial use in equine veterinary practice in Belgium may be attributable to treatment of a false‐positive result.

Main limitations

There was uncertainty regarding the ELISA's sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

This study highlights the importance of appreciating the poor diagnostic value of ELISA screening for Lyme borreliosis as demonstrated by this case study of seroprevalence in southern Belgium where we demonstrate that a nontrivial number of horses is estimated to receive unwarranted treatment due to poor appreciation of screening test characteristics by practitioners, contributing substantially to unnecessary use of antimicrobials.

Vaccination of horses with Lyme vaccines for dogs induces short-lasting antibody responses

Borrelia burgdorferi can induce Lyme disease. Approved Lyme vaccines for horses are currently not available. In an effort to protect horses, veterinarians are using Lyme vaccines licensed for dogs. However, data to assess the response of horses to, or determine the efficacy of this off-label vaccine use are missing. Here, antibodies against outer surface protein A (OspA), OspC, and OspF were quantified in diagnostic serum submissions from horses with a history of vaccination with canine Lyme vaccines. The results suggested that many horses respond with low and often short-lasting antibody responses. Subsequently, four experimental vaccination trials were performed. First, we investigated antibody responses to three canine vaccines in B. burgdorferi-naïve horses. One killed bacterin vaccine induced antibodies against OspC. OspA antibodies were low for all three vaccines and lasted less than 16weeks. The second trial tested the impact of the vaccine dose using the OspA/OspC inducing bacterin vaccine in horses. A 2mL dose produced higher OspA and OspC antibody values than a 1mL dose. However, the antibody response again quickly declined, independent of dose. Third, the horses were vaccinated with 2 doses of a recombinant OspA vaccine. Previous vaccination and/or environmental exposure enhanced the magnitude and longevity of the OspA antibody response to about 20weeks. Last, the influence of intramuscular versus subcutaneous vaccine administration was investigated for the recombinant OspA vaccine. OspA antibody responses were not influenced by injection route. The current work highlights that commercial Lyme vaccines for dogs induce only transient antibody responses in horses which can also be of low magnitude. Protection from infection with B. burgdorferi should not be automatically assumed after vaccinating horses with Lyme vaccines for dogs.