Wang Z, Feng C, Wang X. Negative pressure wound therapy for patients with mediastinitis: A meta-analysis.
Int Wound J 2020;
17:2019-2025. [PMID:
32856392 PMCID:
PMC7949316 DOI:
10.1111/iwj.13494]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate clinical effects between conditional treatment and negative pressure wound therapy for mediastinal infection. Multiple databases were searched to identify relevant studies, and the articles that eventually satisfied the criteria were included. All the meta-analyses were conducted with the Review Manager 5.2. To estimate the quality of each article, risk of bias table was performed. Finally, nine studies including 648 patients met the eligibility criteria. The negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) group and the control group included 353 and 295 patients, respectively. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in operative time (RR = -6.13, 95%CI [-50.00, 37.74], P = .78; P for heterogeneity <.000001, I2 = 100%). The length of hospital stay (MD = -3.07, 95%CI [-4.38, -1.77], P < .00001; P for heterogeneity = .99, I2 = 0%), re-infection (RR = 0.18, 100%CI [0.08, 0.40], P < .00001; P for heterogeneity = 0.48, I2 = 0%), and mortality were significantly different between the two groups (RR = 0.27, 95%CI [0.12, 0.63], P of overall effect = .002). NPWT is a better therapy than conventional treatment for mediastinitis.
Collapse