Long-term and Short-term Dopaminergic (Cabergoline) and Antidopaminergic (Sulpiride) Effects on Insulin Response to Glucose, Glucose Response to Insulin, or Both in Horses

Retrospective assessment of the use of extended-release cabergoline in the management of equine pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction

Introduction

Dopaminergic agonists are accepted as the most effective treatment for pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction. However, some horses are refractory to daily oral pergolide, the recommended registered treatment. Extended-release cabergoline (ERC) injection may offer an alternative. The objective of this retrospective case series was to describe clinical and endocrinological responses to ERC.

Methods

Medical records of horses treated with weekly intramuscular injections of ERC (5 mg/mL, BOVA Aus) at either 0.01 mg/kg (high dose, HD) (n = 10) or 0.005 mg/kg (low dose, LD) (n = 30) were reviewed. Short-term ACTH responses were assessed at 5-8 days using a Wilcoxon signed ranked test. Longer-term ACTH responses (30 to 365 days) were assessed using generalised estimating equations.

Results

Five to eight days after the first dose of LDERC, median adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentration was lower (p = 0.001), changing from 153 pg/mL (IQR: 78, 331) to 57 pg/mL (IQR: 30, 102). With HDERC, median ACTH concentration was also 153 pg/mL (IQR: 96, 185) before and then 56 pg/mL (IQR: 29, 86) after 5-8 days of treatment (p = 0.047). Over 12 months of treatment, ACTH concentration ranged from 14 to >1,250 pg/mL (median: 51 pg/mL) in horses treated with LDERC and 20 to 472 pg/mL (median: 50 pg/mL) in horses treated with HDERC. Measurements remained above the seasonal reference range in 39.3 and 52.3% of horses treated with LDERC and HDERC, respectively. Clinical improvement was reported by owners in 78.3 and 100% of horses treated with LDERC and HDERC, respectively. Partial, self-limiting inappetence was reported in 30.0% of LDERC and 60% HDERC cases. Seven horses exhibited lethargy (5 LDERC, 2 HDERC). Insulin concentrations measured 30 days post-ERC treatment were no different from baseline.

Discussion

Clinical and endocrinological responses were consistent with results of previous reports of oral pergolide treatment. Weekly injection of ERC may be an effective alternative to pergolide; the 0.005 mg/kg dose appeared to be as effective, with less risk of inappetence, than the 0.01 mg/kg dose that has been reported previously.

Effects of Bromocriptine on Glucose and Insulin Dynamics in Normal and Insulin Dysregulated Horses

The objectives of the study were to study the effects of the synthetic ergot alkaloid (EA), bromocriptine, on glucose and lipid metabolism in insulin dysregulated (ID, n = 7) and non-ID (n = 8) mares. Horses were individually housed and fed timothy grass hay and two daily concentrate meals so that the total diet provided 120% of daily DE requirements for maintenance. All horses were given intramuscular bromocriptine injections (0.1 mg/kg BW) every 3 days for 14 days. Before and after 14 days of treatment horses underwent a combined glucose-insulin tolerance test (CGIT) to assess insulin sensitivity and a feed challenge (1 g starch/kg BW from whole oats) to evaluate postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses. ID horses had higher basal plasma concentrations of insulin (P = 0.01) and triglycerides (P = 0.02), and lower concentrations of adiponectin (P = 0.05) compared with non-ID horses. The CGIT response curve showed that ID horses had slower glucose clearance rates (P = 0.02) resulting in a longer time in positive phase (P = 0.03) and had higher insulin concentrations at 75 min (P = 0.0002) compared with non-ID horses. Glucose (P = 0.02) and insulin (P = 0.04) responses to the feeding challenge were lower in non-ID compared to ID horses. Regardless of insulin status, bromocriptine administration increased hay intake (P = 0.03) and decreased grain (P < 0.0001) and total DE (P = 0.0002) intake. Bromocriptine treatment decreased plasma prolactin (P = 0.0002) and cholesterol (P = 0.10) and increased (P = 0.02) adiponectin concentrations in all horses. Moreover, in both groups of horses, bromocriptine decreased glucose clearance rates (P = 0.02), increased time in positive phase (P = 0.04) of the CGIT and increased insulin concentrations at 75 min (P = 0.001). The postprandial glycemic (P = 0.01) and insulinemic (P = 0.001) response following the oats meal was lower after bromocriptine treatment in all horses. In conclusion, in contrast to data in humans and rodents, bromocriptine treatment reduced insulin sensitivity in all horses, regardless of their insulin status. These results indicate that the physiological effects of EA might be different in horses compared to other species. Moreover, because bromocriptine shares a high degree of homology with natural EA, further investigation is warranted in horses grazing endophyte-infected grasses.

Effects of Epinephrine, Detomidine, and Butorphanol on Assessments of Insulin Sensitivity in Mares

Sympathoadrenal stimulation may perturb results of endocrine tests performed on fractious horses. Sedation may be beneficial; however, perturbation of results may preclude useful information. Four experiments were designed to 1) determine the effects of epinephrine on insulin response to glucose (IR2G), 2) assess the effects of detomidine (DET), alone or combined with butorphanol (DET/BUT), on IR2G and glucose response to insulin (GR2I), and 3) assess the effects of BUT alone on IR2G. In Experiment 1, mares were administered saline or epinephrine (5 μg/kg BW) immediately before infusion of glucose (100 mg/kg BW). Glucose stimulated (P < .05) insulin release in controls at 5 minutes that persisted through 30 minutes; insulin was suppressed (P < .05) by epinephrine from 5 to 15 minutes, rising gradually through 30 minutes. Experiments 2 (IR2G) and 3 (GR2I) were conducted as triplicated 3 × 3 Latin squares with the following treatments: saline (SAL), DET, and DET/BUT (all administered at .01 mg/kg BW). Glucose stimulated (P < .05) insulin release that persisted through 30 minutes in SAL mares; DET and DET/BUT severely suppressed (P < .0001) the IR2G. Sedation did not affect resting glucose and had inconsistent effects on the GR2I when mares were treated with 50 mIU/kg BW recombinant human insulin. Butorphanol had no effect on IR2G. In conclusion, adrenergic agonists severely suppress the IR2G and cannot be used for sedation for this test. The use of DET did not alter the GR2I, and therefore may be useful for conducting this test in fractious horses.