Correlational Characteristics of Hoof Conformation and Midstance Kinetics at Walk

Comparison of Six Different Methods for Measuring the Equine Hoof and Recording of its Three-Dimensional Conformation

Different measuring techniques have been used to objectify the classification of hoof shape. The MicroScribe is a novel tool that might prove useful for measuring hooves without prior reconstruction or compensation of projection artefacts. The aim of this study was to compare biometric data of the equine hoof collected by the MicroScribe tool and measurements collected directly from hooves, scaled photographs and radiographs, from photogrammetry models and computed tomography datasets. The suitability of MicroScribe generated data to differentiate individual hoof conformations was tested. A total of 62 measures were recorded from 16 forehooves. 21 linear and nine angular measures were collected by at least four methods each, and evaluated further by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Ratios and differences of these measures were calculated as suitable for the definition of hoof shapes and analysed as well. Absolute equivalency of methods was detected for five linear and none of the angular measurements. The precision of the tested measurement methods was comparable. In some cases, different methods measure different structures. Radiographs tended to overestimate, while computed tomography slides to underestimate distances. Photogrammetry and scaled photographs were less suitable for measuring hoof angles. The MicroScribe tool can readily be used for hoof measurements. Its values for linear measures showed good equivalency with other methods based on real hooves. For angular measurements, the uneven hoof surface might introduce imprecision. Not all hoof conformations could be detected based on measuring results alone. Diagnosis by a skilled veterinarian is still essential.

An investigation into different measurement techniques to assess equine proximal hoof circumference

Equine hoof conformation is integral to equine performance and soundness. Consequently, it is a major area of interest within the field of equine health. Researchers have measured several hoof shape parameters to study the hoof conformation. Proximal hoof circumference (PHC) is a primary hoof shape parameter, and its assessment may help to recognize the early stages of the development of changes in hoof morphology or poor hoof shape. Previous studies have mainly used a measuring tape to measure PHC. However, some doubts still exist regarding the reliability, repeatability and accuracy of measuring tape in this context. The current study conducted a technical comparison between the measuring tape and two alternative methods of 3D scanning and photogrammetry to measure PHC. Five equine limbs were collected from five adult horses, and the PHC of the limbs was measured using these three methods. The 3D scanner method was considered to be the highest accuracy and the reference for method comparisons. Pairwise correlations between the 3D scanner and the other two methods were conducted using a linear mixed model. The measuring tape and photogrammetry tended to overestimate the mean PHC compared to the 3D scanner by 0.96 mm (P > 0.05) and 2.2 mm (P < 0.05), respectively. In addition, an excellent interrater and intrarater correlation coefficient (ICC) index was reported for the reliability of the tape measurements. The variation of the tape measurements was +/-2 mm, which justified the use of measuring tape for PHC measurements in various clinical and horse management applications.