Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor-α blockers for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials

Current status of novel biologics and small molecule drugs in the individualized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rapidly evolving with the development of biologics and small molecule drugs (SMDs). However, these drugs are not guaranteed to be effective in all patients, and a “ceiling effect” of biologic monotherapy may occur. This issue highlights an unmet need for optimizing the use of biologics and predicting therapeutic responses. Thus, the development of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action is urgently needed for patients with primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to conventional biologics and SMDs. In addition, combining different biologics or SMDs has been proposed as a novel strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD, which theoretically has multidimensional anti-inflammatory potential. Based on the current evidence available for IBD, dual targeted therapy may be a promising strategy for refractory IBD patients who have failed in multiple biologic trea-tments or who have extraintestinal manifestation. Additionally, identifying the subgroup of IBD patients who are responding to biological combination therapies is also equally important in stable disease remission. In this review, we sum-marize the newly developed biologics and SMDs and the current status of bio-logics/SMDs to highlight the development of individualized treatment in IBD.

Synthesis and activity of N-(5-hydroxy-3,4,6-trimethylpyridin-2-yl)acetamide analogues as anticolitis agents via dual inhibition of TNF-α- and IL-6-induced cell adhesions

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are the critical pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inhibition of these cytokines and related signaling pathways has been a target for the development of IBD therapeutics. In the current study, 6-acetamido-2,4,5-trimethylpyridin-3-ol (1) and various analogues with the amido scaffold were synthesized and examined for their inhibitory activities in in vitro and in vivo IBD models. The parent compound 1 (1 μM) showed an inhibitory activity against TNF-α- and IL-6-induced adhesion of monocytes to colon epithelial cells, which was similar to tofacitinib (1 μM), a JAK inhibitor, but much better than mesalazine (1,000 μM). All the analogues showed a positive relationship (R² = 0.8943 in a linear regression model) between the inhibitory activities against TNF-α-induced and those against IL-6-induced adhesion. Compound 2-19 turned out to be the best analogue and showed much better inhibitory activity against TNF-α- and IL-6-induced adhesion of the cells than tofacitinib. In addition, oral administration of compound 1 and 2-19 resulted in a significant suppression of clinical signs of TNBS-induced rat colitis, including weight loss, colon tissue edema, and myeloperoxidase activity, a marker for inflammatory cell infiltration in colon tissues. More importantly, compound 2-19 (1 mg/kg) was more efficacious in ameliorating colitis than compound 1 and sulfasalazine (300 mg/kg), the commonly prescribed oral IBD drug. Taken together, the results suggest that compound 2-19 can be a novel platform for dual-acting IBD drug discovery targeting both TNF-α and IL-6 signaling.

Efficacy and safety of biologic agents and tofacitinib in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A systematic overview of meta-analyses

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disease of the colon and rectum. Treatment options include biologics and tofacitinib.

Objectives

We aim to summarize the evidence on efficacy and safety of biologics and tofacitinib in moderate-to-severe UC.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials assessing adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib in UC. Efficacy outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical response, clinical remission and mucosal healing. Safety outcomes included adverse events and serious adverse events.

Results

The overview involved 31 meta-analyses. All four biologics and tofacitinib were superior to placebo regarding efficacy. Indirect comparisons suggested that infliximab may be better than adalimumab and golimumab to induce clinical response and mucosal healing. Safety analyses indicated no increased rates of adverse events, except for infliximab.

Conclusions

Biologics and tofacitinib are efficacious and safe for treating UC. These findings can support clinical decision-making.

Therapeutic innovations in inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a spectrum of complex multifactorial immune disorders characterized by chronic inflammation of the gut. Significant advances have been made in unraveling the pathogenesis of this disease spectrum, which have spurred the discovery of new therapeutic targets and strategies. In this review, we highlight the emerging new classes of IBD therapeutics under clinical evaluation and their method of action, including JAK inhibitors, anti-SMAD7 oligonucleotides, and cell-based therapies. Moreover, we discuss how an approach based on unique molecular insights in a given patient will, in the future, lead to a truly individualized/tailored disease management, starting at diagnosis, aiding in prognosis, and resulting in a personalized therapeutic approach.

Malignancy risk of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

The objective of the study is to systematically review the malignancy risk of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents. Databases of PubMed Medline, OVID EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series that evaluated malignancy risk of anti-TNFα blockers. Search time duration was restricted from January 1st, 2000 to July 16th, 2015. Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaires were used to assess the quality of included reviews. Two methodology trained reviewers separately and repeatedly screened searched studies according to study selection criteria, collected data, and assessed quality. Totally, 42 reviews proved eligible with only one Cochrane review. Anti-TNFα antagonists were extensively used to treat various diseases; nevertheless, malignancy risks were most commonly described in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In RA patients, no increased risks of breast cancer, lymphoma, and non-melanoma skin cancer were found, but if the use of anti-TNFα agents was associated with elevated risk of overall malignancy was still uncertainty. In IBD patients, the use of anti-TNFα inhibitors was not connected with enhanced risk of overall cancer. No increased cancer risk was found in other disease conditions. Twenty-nine reviews were rated as good quality, 12 as moderate, and one as poor. There are no sufficient evidences to draw the conclusion that anti-TNFα blockers have relationship with increased malignancy risk.