A fatal iatrogenic right vertebral injury after transoral odontoidectomy and posterior cervical stabilization for a type II odontoid fracture

VertebralArtery Injury with Anterior Cervical Spine Operations: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Clinical Outcomes, and Management Strategies

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical spine operations are commonly performed on cervical spine pathologies and to a large extent are safe and successful. However, these surgical procedures expose the vertebral artery, posing a risk of harm to it.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to critically assess primary articles discussing treatment strategies "vertebral artery injury" AND "anterior cervical spine" and develop a management strategy based on our experience and meta-analysis of the literature. In addition, we present an illustrative case of iatrogenic vertebral artery injury presenting with 6 to 7 months' history of progressive dysphagia was transferred to our care from an outside institution.

RESULTS

Included and analyzed were 43 articles that detailed 75 cases involving vertebral artery injury (VAI) in anterior cervical spine operations. Preoperatively, frequent clinical findings reported were sensory deficit (26 patients [63.41%]), motor deficit (20 patients [48.78%]), and pain (17 patients [41.46%]). In total, 32 patients (50.00%) endured injury of their left VA, and 30 patients had a right VAI. The 2 common causes of VAI were drilling (24 patients [40.00%]) and instrumentation (8 patients [13.33%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, our review recommends repair or tamponade packing with a hemostatic agent for primary management. Should tamponade packing with a hemostatic agent be used for primary management, secondary management should entail either repair, stenting occlusion, embolization, anticoagulants, or ligation. Further examination of this treatment strategy based on a larger cohort is necessary.

Iatrogenic Vascular Injury Associated with Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic vascular injury is an uncommon complication of anterior and/or posterior surgical approaches to the cervical spine. Although the results of this injury may be life-threatening, mortality/morbidity can be reduced by an understanding of its mechanism and proper management.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review to provide an update of this devastating complication in spine surgery. A total of 72 articles including 194 cases of vascular lesions following cervical spine surgery between 1962 and 2021 were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 53 female and 41 male cases (in addition to 100 cases with unreported sex) with ages ranging from 3 to 86 years. The vascular injuries were classified according to the spinal procedures, such as anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery. The interval between the symptom of the vascular injury and the surgical procedure ranged from 0 to 10 years. Only two-thirds of patients underwent intra- or postoperative imaging and the most frequently injured vessel was the vertebral artery (86.60%). Laceration was the most common lesion (41.24%), followed by pseudoaneurysm (16.49%) and dissection (5.67%). Vascular repair was performed in 114 patients. The mortality rate was 7.22%, and 18.04% of patients had 1 or more other complications. Most presumed causes of vascular lesions were by instrumentation/screw placement (31.44%) or drilling (20.61%). Sixteen patients had an anomalous artery. Direct microsurgical repair was achieved in only 15 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased anatomical knowledge and advanced imaging techniques, we need to consider the risk of vascular injury as a surgical complication in patients with cervical spine pathologies.

Surgical anatomy of neurovascular structures related to ventral C1-2 complex: an anatomical study

OBJECTIVE

Transoral odontoidectomy and ventral C1-2 stabilization are important surgical procedures, performed to decompress ventral spinal cord, and to stabilize craniovertebral junction. These procedures require knowledge regarding surgical anatomy of neurovascular structures ventral to the C1-2 complex. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationships between neurovascular structures and bony landmarks in ventral atlantoaxial complex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed on six formaldehyde fixed cadaveric head and neck specimens. Relevant anatomical parameters, including distances from the midsagittal line to internal carotid arteries (ICA), vertebral arteries (VA), and hypoglossal nerves (HN), were measured using electronic calipers.

RESULTS

The mean distance between ICA and midsagittal line was observed as 26.13 mm at the level of axis and 24.67 mm at the level of the atlas. The mean distance between VA and midsagittal line was observed as 15.38 mm at the level of axis and 26.54 mm at the level of the atlas. The mean distance between HN and midsagittal line was observed as 33.27 and 33.58 mm at the level of the atlas and axis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that ICA and HN proceeded ventrally or laterally along the lateral aspect of the C1 lateral mass; therefore, the area located ventrally along the medial components of the C1 lateral mass was the safe zone for anterior surgical approach.

Neurological outcomes following iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior atlanto-axial instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic vascular injury is a feared complication of posterior atlanto-axial instrumentation. A better understanding of clinical outcome and management options following this injury will allow surgeons to better care for these patients. The object of the study was to systematically review the neurologic outcomes after iatrogenic vascular injury during atlanto-axial posterior instrumentation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the Medline database following PRISMA guidelines. In our analysis, we included any retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, case reports, cases series, or systematic reviews with patients who had undergone posterior atlanto-axial fusion via screw rod constructs (SRC) or transarticular screws (TAS) that reported a patient with an injury to an arterial vessel directly attributable to the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty cases of vascular injury were reported in 2078 (2.9%) patients over 27 publications. The average age for this patient population was 55.7+/-17.9. Vascular injury following posterior C1/2 instrumentation resulted in ipsilateral stroke in 10.0% (n=6/60) and non-persistent neurologic deficit in 6.7% (n=4/60) of cases with the deficit being permanent (not including death) in 1.7% (n=1/60) of cases. Four patients (6.7%) died. Arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysm occurred in 8.3% (n=5/60) and 3.3% (n=2/60) of cases, respectively. Eight patients (13.3%) underwent endovascular repair of the injury with no permanent deficit.

CONCLUSION

Neurological morbidity after iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior C1/2 fixation is higher than previously reported in literature. Some patients may benefit from endovascular treatment. Surgeons should be aware of normal and anomalous vertebral artery anatomy to avoid this potentially catastrophic complication.

Modified technique of transoral release in one-stage anterior release and posterior reduction for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

BACKGROUND

One-stage anterior release and posterior reduction is one of the most effective methods for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. However, the criteria of appropriate tissue release for successful posterior reduction is yet to be confirmed. Hence, an assistant technique using the transoral approach to verify satisfactory release is required. To evaluate the efficacy of the modified technique of transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) with patients underwent one-stage anterior release and posterior reduction.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and June 2014, 23 consecutive patients diagnosed with IAAD free from bony union between the C1-C2 facet joints on reconstructive computed tomography scan underwent one-stage anterior release and posterior reduction after no response to 2 weeks of skull traction. During transoral release, an elevator was used as a lever repeatedly to confirm a 3-5 mm bilateral joint space between the lateral masses of the atlas and axis. The release was accomplished since a 3-5 mm joint space was achieved. After anterior release, posterior reduction and instrumented fusion were subsequently performed.

RESULTS

All patients were observed for an average of 18 (range 6-50) months. Nineteen of 23 patients achieved complete reduction while four had an incomplete reduction. Significant differences in pre- and postoperative JOA scores and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were found. Twenty-one patients presenting with myelopathy had a JOA score of 12.9 at final follow-up, improved from 7.8 before surgery. The mean CMA improved to 143.5° postoperatively from 101.8° preoperatively. Bony fusion was confirmed in all cases under radiologic assessment during follow-up; there were no instrument failures.

CONCLUSION

The modified technique of transoral release provides appropriate criteria for anterior release, to achieve good posterior reduction without excessive tissue release or intraspinal manipulation, proving its value as an assistant technique in one-stage anterior release and posterior reduction for IAAD.

Complications of transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Odontoidectomy has been considered an effective way to treat anterior cervicomedullary compression in patients presenting with craniocervical joint anomalies. The transoral and transnasal routes have been described for anterior decompression surgery. However, to date, a comprehensive review of the complications from this procedure is lacking in the extant medical literature. Therefore, herein, we review this specific literature as a resource for surgeons.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature via online search engines was performed.

CONCLUSION

The most reported complications for odontoidectomy are CSF leakage, postoperative craniocervical instability, velopharyngeal insufficiency, wound dehiscence, pulmonary issues, meningitis, and death. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of complications of odontoidectomy. Increased awareness of the more common complications associated with this procedure may help in the care of patients in the future.

Postmortem-computed tomography and postmortem-computed tomography-angiography: a focused update

The use of multidetector CT (MDCT) represents a reality routinely used in several forensic institutes, for the numerous advantages that this diagnostic tool can provide; costs are becoming increasingly lower; data acquisition is always faster and once acquired may be revalued at any time. However, there are also some diagnostic limitations, for example, the visualization of the vascular system or a limited soft tissue contrast. In order to overcome these limitations, in recent years, contrast medium has been introduced in postmortem cases, with the development of several techniques of PMCT angiography (PMCTA) and standardized protocols to make them easily reproducible. The aim of this review is to highlight the advantages and pitfalls of PMCT and PMCTA in forensic investigation, taking into consideration the broad spectrum of applications both for natural and unnatural deaths and the numerous methods currently used. Secondly, in the light of the considerable progress in this field and the attempt to develop standardized protocols of PMCTA, the authors aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of PMCTA in comparison both to PMCT and conventional autopsy.