Involuntary sterilization among HIV-positive Garifuna women from Honduras seeking asylum in the United States: Two case reports

Cervical Cancer Screening Among Older Garifuna Women Residing in New York City

This study examined the level of adherence to the recommended cervical cancer screening guidelines among Garifuna women residing in New York City, and screening practice association with demographic factors, access to healthcare services, perceptions/barriers to cervical cancer screening, acculturation, identity, and level of screening guideline knowledge. Four hundred Garifuna women were surveyed. The study results reveal low self-reported cervical cancer screening rates (60%), increased age, visiting a Garifuna healer in the past year, perceived benefits of receiving the screening test, and knowledge of the Pap test as having the highest predictive variability for receiving cervical cancer screening. The odds of having a Pap test were significantly lower in older women (age 65 years and above) and those visiting a traditional healer within the past year. The study findings provide several implications for developing culturally appropriate interventions aimed to increase the level of cervical cancer screening in this unique immigrant group.

Impact of forensic medical evaluations on immigration relief grant rates and correlates of outcomes in the United States

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of forensic medical evaluations on grant rates for applicants seeking immigration relief in the United States (U.S.) and to identify significant correlates of grant success. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2584 cases initiated by Physicians for Human Rights between 2008 and 2018 that included forensic medical evaluations, and found that 81.6% of applicants for various forms of immigration relief were granted relief, as compared to the national asylum grant rate of 42.4%. Among the study's cohort, the majority (73.7%) of positive outcomes were grants of asylum. A multivariable regression analysis revealed that age, continent of origin, history of sexual or gender-based violence, gang violence, LGB sexual orientation, and being detained by the U.S. government at the time of evaluation request were statistically associated with case outcomes. Forensic physical evaluation was more strongly associated with a positive outcome than forensic psychological evaluation. Our findings strengthen and expand prior evidence that forensic medical evaluations can have a substantial positive impact on an applicant's immigration relief claim. Given the growing applicant pool in the U.S., there is an urgent need for more trained clinicians to conduct forensic medical evaluations as well as to educate adjudicators, immigration lawyers, and policy makers about the traumatic nature of the life-altering events that applicants for immigration relief experience.