Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

EANM consensus document on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in fever and inflammation of unknown origin

PURPOSE

Patients with fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO) are clinically challenging due to variable clinical presentations with nonspecific symptoms and many differential diagnoses. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) is increasingly used in FUO and IUO, but the optimal diagnostic strategy remains controversial. This consensus document aims to assist clinicians and nuclear medicine specialists in the appropriate use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in FUO and IUO based on current evidence.

METHODS

A working group created by the EANM infection and inflammation committee performed a systematic literature search based on PICOs with "patients with FUO/IUO" as population, "[18F]FDG-PET/CT" as intervention, and several outcomes including pre-scan characteristics, scan protocol, diagnostic yield, impact on management, prognosis, and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

We included 68 articles published from 2001 to 2023: 9 systematic reviews, 49 original papers on general adult populations, and 10 original papers on specific populations. All papers were analysed and included in the evidence-based recommendations.

CONCLUSION

FUO and IUO remains a clinical challenge and [18F]FDG PET/CT has a definite role in the diagnostic pathway with an overall diagnostic yield or helpfulness in 50-60% of patients. A positive scan is often contributory by directly guiding treatment or subsequent diagnostic procedure. However, a negative scan may be equally important by excluding focal disease and predicting a favorable prognosis. Similar results are obtained in specific populations such as ICU-patients, children and HIV-patients.

Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU

RATIONALE

Fever is frequently an early indicator of infection and often requires rigorous diagnostic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

This is an update of the 2008 Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society (IDSA) and Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) guideline for the evaluation of new-onset fever in adult ICU patients without severe immunocompromise, now using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

PANEL DESIGN

The SCCM and IDSA convened a taskforce to update the 2008 version of the guideline for the evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients, which included expert clinicians as well as methodologists from the Guidelines in Intensive Care, Development and Evaluation Group. The guidelines committee consisted of 12 experts in critical care, infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, organ transplantation, public health, clinical research, and health policy and administration. All task force members followed all conflict-of-interest procedures as documented in the American College of Critical Care Medicine/SCCM Standard Operating Procedures Manual and the IDSA. There was no industry input or funding to produce this guideline.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review for each population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak or as best-practice statements.

RESULTS

The panel issued 12 recommendations and 9 best practice statements. The panel recommended using central temperature monitoring methods, including thermistors for pulmonary artery catheters, bladder catheters, or esophageal balloon thermistors when these devices are in place or accurate temperature measurements are critical for diagnosis and management. For patients without these devices in place, oral or rectal temperatures over other temperature measurement methods that are less reliable such as axillary or tympanic membrane temperatures, noninvasive temporal artery thermometers, or chemical dot thermometers were recommended. Imaging studies including ultrasonography were recommended in addition to microbiological evaluation using rapid diagnostic testing strategies. Biomarkers were recommended to assist in guiding the discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy. All recommendations issued were weak based on the quality of data.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines panel was able to formulate several recommendations for the evaluation of new fever in a critically ill adult patient, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on weak evidence. This highlights the need for the rapid advancement of research in all aspects of this issue-including better noninvasive methods to measure core body temperature, the use of diagnostic imaging, advances in microbiology including molecular testing, and the use of biomarkers.

Is Imaging Bacteria with PET a Realistic Option or an Illusion?

The application of [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) as a radiotracer to detect sites of inflammation (either due to bacterial infection or primary inflammation) has led to exploring the role of PET in visualizing bacteria directly at sites of infection. However, the results from such efforts are controversial and inconclusive so far. We aimed to assess the limitations of PET as an effective modality in the diagnosis of bacterial infections. Inflammation due to bacterial infections can be visualized by using [¹⁸F]FDG-PET. However, the non-specificity of [¹⁸F]FDG makes it undesirable to visualize bacteria as the underlying cause of inflammation. Hence, more specific radiotracers that possibly bind to or accumulate in bacteria-specific receptors or enzymes are being explored. Several radiotracers, including 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluorosorbitol ([¹⁸F]FDS), 6-[¹⁸F]-fluoromaltose, [¹¹C]para-aminobenzoic acid ([¹¹C]PABA), radiolabeled trimethoprim (¹¹C-TMP) and its analog fluoropropyl-trimethoprim (¹⁸F-FPTMP), other radiolabeled sugars, and antimicrobial drugs have been used to image microorganisms. Unfortunately, no progress has been made in translating the results to routine human use; feasibility and other factors have constrained their success in clinical settings. In the current article, we discuss the limitations of direct bacterial visualization with PET tracers, but emphasize the important role of [¹⁸F]FDG-PET as the only option for detecting evidence of infection.

Molecular Imaging of Fever of Unknown Origin: An Update

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, ⁶⁷Ga-citrate and white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy are molecular imaging techniques currently used in the diagnostic workup of fever of unknown origin. However, it is unknown which technique fits which patient group best. A systematic literature search has been performed for original articles regarding the use of molecular imaging in fever of unknown origin. A total of 820 eligible studies were screened of which 63 articles evaluating 5094 patients met the inclusion criteria. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provided good diagnostic accuracy (with a weighted mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predicting value, negative predictive value, accuracy and helpfulness of 84.4%, 61.8%, 80.7%, 67.8%, 76.3%, and 61.1%, respectively). Even within specific patient groups such as children, elderly, patients with connective tissue diseases, patients on renal replacement therapy, and HIV-infected patients, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provided good diagnostic values. For ⁶⁷Ga-citrate scintigraphy, the weighted mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and helpfulness were 42.2%, 80.3%, 82.4%, 41.9%, and 42.2%, respectively. WBC scintigraphy shows a weighted mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 73.5%, 86.3%, 79.1%, 82.4%, and 79.5%, respectively. However, compared to ⁶⁷Ga-citrate and WBC scintigraphy, significantly more research has been performed using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has the advantage of relatively short procedural duration; it is therefore the preferred molecular diagnostic imaging technique. ⁶⁷Ga-citrate and WBC scintigraphy can only be considered if ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is not available.

Real-world assessment of the clinical utility of whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infection

Few studies have aimed to capture the full spectrum of 18fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) use for evaluation of infections in a real-world context. We performed a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for the workup of infection between April, 2013 and September, 2019. The clinical indications for and impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on diagnostic and antimicrobial management were evaluated across different infectious indications. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common indication was identifying a source of a known infection (46%), followed by fever of unknown etiology (FUE)/fever of unknown origin (FUO) (38%), and other (16%). 18F-FDG PET/CT was determined to have had a diagnostic or management clinical impact for a total of 22 patients (36%) including 12/28 (43%) of patients with known infection, 7/23 (30%) of patients with FUE/FUO, and 3/10 (30%) of patients with other indications. 18F-FDG PET/CT confirmed suspected prosthetic endovascular infection for 6/16 (38%) patients. In this study,18F-FDG PET/CT led to a clinical impact on diagnostic and treatment management of hospitalized patients across a variety of syndromes and particularly for source identification in the setting of known infection.

Scoping review on diagnostic criteria and investigative approach in sepsis of unknown origin in critically ill patients

Background

Up to 11% of critically ill patients with sepsis have an unknown source, where the pathogen and site of infection are unclear. The aim of this scoping review is to document currently reported diagnostic criteria of sepsis of unknown origin (SUO) and identify the types and breadth of existing evidence supporting diagnostic processes to identify the infection source in critically ill patients with suspected SUO.

Methods

A literature search of Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed for published studies from 1910 to August 19, 2021 addressing the topic of SUO was performed. Study type, country of origin according to World Bank classification, diagnostic criteria of sepsis of unknown origin, and investigative approaches were extracted from the studies.

Results

From an initial 722 studies, 89 unique publications fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included for full text review. The most common publication type was case report/series 45/89 (51%). Only 10/89 (11%) of studies provided a diagnostic criteria of SUO, but a universally accepted diagnostic criterion was not identified. The included studies discussed 30/89 (34%) history, 23/89 (26%) examination, 57/89 (64%) imaging, microbiology 39/89 (44%), and special tests 32/89 (36%) as part of the diagnostic processes in patients with SUO.

Conclusions

Universally accepted diagnostic criteria for SUO was not found. Prospective studies on investigative processes in critically ill patients managed as SUO across different healthcare settings are needed to understand the epidemiology and inform the diagnostic criteria required to diagnose SUO.