1
|
Kennedy MM, Abdel-Aty Y, Butterfield R, Zhang N, Lott DG. Is Continued Perioperative Antithrombotic Therapy Safe When Performing Open Tracheostomy? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132:1285-1292. [PMID: 36647237 DOI: 10.1177/00034894221147807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To date, there are no specific guidelines on antithrombotic therapy (ATT) management, which includes both anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications, for open tracheostomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of perioperative antithrombotic medication during open tracheostomy influences the incidence of perioperative or postoperative complications. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent open tracheostomies at a tertiary care medical center from January 2015 to December 2019. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, indication for tracheostomy, ATT use, operative details, and complications. RESULTS A total of 217 tracheostomies were evaluated for this study, of which 148 (68.2%) were not on ATT and 69 (31.8%) were on ATT during surgery. No significant difference was observed based on ATT status in perioperative bleeding (P = .983), postoperative bleeding (P = .24), or median days to decannulation (P = .5986). ATT patients were 2.67 times more likely to experience 30-day mortality than those non-ATT patients (P = .035). There was only one death due to hemorrhage in the ATT group. This was unrelated to the tracheostomy. This compares to 2 hemorrhage-related deaths in those not on ATT. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in perioperative or postoperative bleeding based on ATT use. Patients on ATT were significantly more likely to experience 30-day mortality, however only one death was due to hemorrhage in the ATT group and was unrelated to tracheostomy. Therefore, continued perioperative ATT use appears to be safe when performing open tracheostomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve M Kennedy
- Head and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yassmeen Abdel-Aty
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of South Florida Health
| | - Richard Butterfield
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, USA
| | - Nan Zhang
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, USA
| | - David G Lott
- Head and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta S, Dixit S, Choudhry D, Govil D, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, Zirpe K, Srinivasan S, Mohamed Z, Gupta KV, Wanchoo J, Chakrabortty N, Gurav S. Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24:S31-S42. [PMID: 32205955 PMCID: PMC7085814 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-g23184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation undergo tracheostomy to facilitate weaning. The practice in India may be different from the rest of the world and therefore, in order to understand this, ISCCM conducted a multicentric observational study "DIlatational percutaneous vs Surgical tracheoStomy in intEnsive Care uniT: A practice pattern observational multicenter study (DISSECT Study)" followed by an ISCCM Expert Panel committee meeting to formulate Practice recommendations pertinent to Indian ICUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS All existing International guidelines on the topic, various randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, retrospective studies were taken into account to formulate the guidelines. Wherever Indian data was not available, international data was analysed. A modified Grade system was followed for grading the recommendation. RESULTS After analyzing the entire available data, the recommendations were made by the grading system agreed by the Expert Panel. The recommendations took into account the indications and contraindications of tracheostomy; effect of timing of tracheostomy on incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia, ICU length of stay, ventilator free days & Mortality; comparison of surgical and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in terms of incidence of complications and cost to the patient; Comparison of various techniques of PDT; Use of fiberoptic bronchoscope and ultrasound in PDT; experience of the operator and qualification; certain special conditions like coagulopathy and morbid obesity. CONCLUSION This document presents the first Indian recommendations on tracheostomy in adult critically ill patients based on the practices of the country. These guidelines are expected to improve the safety and extend the indications of tracheostomy in critically ill patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Gupta S, Dixit S, Choudhry D, Govil D, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 1):S31-S42.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Gupta
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Subhal Dixit
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjeevan & MJM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India, , e-mail:
| | - Dhruva Choudhry
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Health Sciences Rohtak, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Deepak Govil
- Department of Critical Care, Institute of Critical Care & Anesthesiology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | | | - Srinivas Samavedam
- Department of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Kapil Zirpe
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Ruby Hall Clinic, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India, , e-mail:
| | - Shrikanth Srinivasan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, New Delhi, India, , e-mail:
| | - Zubair Mohamed
- Department of Organ Transplant Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India, , e-mail:
| | - Kv Venkatesha Gupta
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, , e-mail:
| | - Jaya Wanchoo
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Neurosciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Nilanchal Chakrabortty
- Department of Neurointensive Care, Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, , e-mail:
| | - Sushma Gurav
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Ruby Hall Clinic, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India, , e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|