[Management of herpes zoster neurotrophic ulcer using a new matrix therapy agent (RGTA): A case report]

Case Reports for Topical Treatment of Corneal Ulcers with a New Matrix Therapy Agent or RGTA® in Dogs

Superficial corneal ulcers that fail to heal within a normal time period and are refractory to conventional therapy in dogs are common in veterinary practice. Different etiologies can lead to this result, including spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCEDs) and ulcerative keratitis associated with bullous keratopathy. Thus, there is an urgent need to find new therapeutic approaches such as matrix therapy replacement. To determine the efficacy of a new ophthalmic treatment (Clerapliq^®) for SCCEDs and ulcerative keratitis associated with bullous keratopathy, a total of 11 dogs referred to the clinic because of nonhealing erosive ulcers after a classic primary treatment were enrolled to get this new treatment. Dogs underwent ophthalmic exams and 7 dogs (10 eyes) were diagnosed with superficial ulceration and 4 dogs (5 eyes) with bullous keratopathy due to endothelial dystrophy/degeneration. They received eye drops of Clerapliq^® every 3 days until recovery. The results showed that the corneas with recurrences of the ulcers were resolved predominantly by using Clerapliq^® every 3 days in 83.3% of the cases during a period of treatment ranging between 6 to 35 days. Therefore, this new approach using matrix therapy regenerating technology in treating superficial ulcers and bullous keratopathy in dogs can be successfully considered as an adjunctive therapy.

Antiviral effects of Cacicol®, a heparan sulfate biomimetic for corneal regeneration therapy, for herpes simplex virus type-1 and varicella zoster virus infection

BACKGROUND

Cacicol^®, a topical eye biopolymer containing a poly-carboxymethylglucose sulfate solution that is a regenerating matrix therapy agent, intended for wound healing of persistent corneal epithelial defects. Based on the chemical composition, we hypothesized that Cacicol^® may compete with natural heparan sulfate (HS) which initiates cell surface attachment of herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1), varicella zoster virus (VZV) and human adenovirus (HAdV), three viruses associated with corneal infections.

METHODS

Cacicol^® was compared to vehicle in the following viral strains: HSV-1 SC16 strain and HSV-1 PSLR, a clinical isolate highly resistant to acyclovir and foscarnet; VZV ATH and VZV FLO, two VZV clinical isolates; and HAdV-D37 strain. Viruses in Cacicol^® or vehicle were added to cells for 1 h during adsorption then viral replication was assessed by plaque reduction assays on Vero cells for HSV-1 and MeWo cells for VZV and by immunostaining assay on Hep-2 cells for HAdV-D37.

RESULTS

The vehicle had no effect, dose-dependent effects were demonstrated when HSV-1 SC16, HSV-1 PSLR, VZV ATH and VZV FLO were inoculated in the presence of Cacicol^®, inhibiting viral replication by 98.4%, 98.9%, 90.1% and 89.0%, respectively. Cacicol^® had no antiviral effect against HAdV-D37.

CONCLUSIONS

Cacicol^® has a significant antiviral activity on HSV-1 and VZV, but not on HAdV-D37. The lack of effect on HAdV is probably because it is less dependent on HS interactions for cell entry. Clinical studies are necessary to determine Cacicol^® for an adjunct or alternative therapy of corneal HSV-1 or VZV infection, particularly for the management of antiviral resistant HSV-1.

Evaluation of corneal epithelial wound healing after penetrating keratoplasty in patients receiving a new matrix therapy agent (regenerating agent)

OBJECTIVES

Complete epithelial wound healing is a milestone in early postoperative care after penetrating keratoplasty. The re-epithelialization rate after penetrating keratoplasty was measured in patients receiving a new matrix therapy agent (regenerating agent, Cacicol^®) that mimics heparan sulphates.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, single-centre observational study. A total of 33 consecutive patients (33 eyes) who underwent an 8.25-mm diameter penetrating keratoplasty were treated with regenerating agent eye drops: one drop in the operating theatre immediately after graft, then on alternate days. Patients were divided into those at low risk (13 patients) and high risk (20 patients) of delayed wound healing, and follow-up was performed by digital slit lamp with fluorescein-dye testing repeated daily at a fixed time. Dye area was measured using ImageJ freeware. The main endpoint was epithelial healing after regenerating agent therapy.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation time to complete healing for all patients was 2.7 ± 1.1 (median: 3, range: 1-6) days. This was obtained on Day 1 for 15% of patients, Day 2 for 33%, Day 3 for 88%, Day 4 for 94% and Day 6 for 100%. There was no significant difference between low- and high-risk patients. The area of epithelial defect decreased by a mean ± standard deviation of 75% ± 22% between Day 1 and Day 2, corresponding to a mean ± standard deviation wound-healing rate of 11.5 ± 6.5 mm²/D. There were no systemic or local side effects related to regenerating agent.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary data suggest that regenerating agent could be a useful, non-invasive therapeutic approach in postoperative management of penetrating keratoplasty with the potential to accelerate re-epithelialization.

Matrix regeneration agents improve wound healing in non-stressed human corneal epithelial cells

PurposeMatrix regenerating agents (RGTAs) emerged as promising in vivo wound-healing agents. These agents could prove beneficial for the treatment of dry eye disease-associated corneal micro-erosions; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the wound healing efficacy of regenerative agents (RGTAs or serum) in an in vitro model of hyperosmolarity (HO) stressed and non-stressed human corneal epithelial cells.Patients and methodsThe migration and proliferation induced by the regenerative agents was evaluated using an in vitro scratch wound assay and brome-deoxy-uridine incorporation. The inflammatory profile and effects of osmoregulators were also investigated. The two-tailed paired t-test calculated the statistical significance, with P-value<0.05 considered significant.ResultsThe most efficient inducer of re-epithelization was 2% serum, followed closely by 2% RGTA with an average improvement in cell migration of 1.8- and 1.4-fold, respectively, when compared with the non-treated control. Hyperosmolar stress significantly reduced the restorative effects of both serum and RGTAs; these effects were, however, neutralized by the osmoregulator betaine.ConclusionThese findings suggest that RGTAs could provide efficient treatment for dry-eye associated corneal micro-lesions if ocular surface HO is neutralized.

RGTA® or ReGeneraTing Agents mimic heparan sulfate in regenerative medicine: from concept to curing patients

The importance of extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity in maintaining normal tissue function is highlighted by numerous pathologies and situations of acute and chronic injury associated with dysregulation or destruction of ECM components. Heparan sulfate (HS) is a key component of the ECM, where it fulfils important functions associated with tissue homeostasis. Its degradation following tissue injury disrupts this delicate equilibrium and may impair the wound healing process. ReGeneraTing Agents (RGTA^®s) are polysaccharides specifically designed to replace degraded HS in injured tissues. The unique properties of RGTA^® (resistance to degradation, binding and protection of ECM structural and signaling proteins, like HS) permit the reconstruction of the ECM, restoring both structural and biochemical functions to this essential substrate, and facilitating the processes of tissue repair and regeneration. Here, we review 25 years of research surrounding this HS mimic, supporting the mode of action, pre-clinical studies and therapeutic efficacy of RGTA^® in the clinic, and discuss the potential of RGTA^® in new branches of regenerative medicine.

Treatment of Acanthamoeba neurotrophic corneal ulcer with topical matrix therapy

Background

This study was done to evaluate the visual and anatomical outcomes of topical regenerating agents as a novel therapy for neutrophic corneal ulcer (NCU) secondary to acanthamoeba infection.

Findings

A 20-year-old woman with a history of contact lens wear was referred to our hospital for keratitis after responding poorly to conventional treatment. In vivo confocal microscopy images suggested acanthamoeba keratitis with double-walled cysts in the anterior corneal stroma. Acanthamoeba infection was confirmed by laboratory findings. She was started on 0.1 % propamidine and 0.02 % chlorhexidine drops every hour. The antibiotic and antifungal drops were stopped when bacterial and fungal cultures proved negative. A central neurotrophic corneal ulcers (NCU) appeared, and despite treatment with artificial tears, bandage contact lens, and autologous serum, the ulcer worsened and she was treated with topical CACICOL20 (1 drop every 2 days) for 8 weeks. The corneal defect was completely repaired in 3 weeks. The treatment was well tolerated, and no local or systemic side effects were noted. Visual acuity remained 20/400. Two months later, the defect was still closed and the patient continued with 0.1 % propamidine and 0.02 % chlorhexidine drops, bandage contact lens, artificial tears, and autologous serum.

Conclusions

Topical regenerating agents interact with components of the extracellular matrix, binding matrix proteins and protecting them from proteolysis, restoring the matrix environment, and improving tissue healing. In this case, CALCICOL20 was effective for vision stabilization, wound healing, and was well tolerated for NCU secondary to acanthamoeba infection.