Analyse à long terme de la bulle de filtration après chirurgie de glaucome, par échographie ultrasonore

Ultrasound biomicroscopy in ophthalmology

This review presents data on the use of the method of ultrasonic biomicroscopy (UBM) of the anterior segment of the eye in ophthalmological practice in adults and children. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) is a contact non-invasive method for visualizing structures of the anterior segment of the eye using high-frequency ultrasound in the range from 35 to 100 MHz. Literature data indicate that UBM can be used to visualize almost all structures of the anterior segment, including the cornea, iridocorneal angle, anterior chamber, iris, ciliary body and lens, as well as the peripheral parts of the retina, vasculature and vitreous. There is data on the use of this method in the study of pathogenetic aspects of glaucoma, pseudoecfoliative syndrome, various types of cataracts, post-traumatic injuries of the anterior segment of the eye, meimobium gland dysfunction and other ophthalmopathologies. The use of UBM in children, due to the peculiarities of its implementation, is not widespread, but due to the specificity of the data obtained using it, it is promising. The limited information about the use of UBM in retinopathy of prematurity and the diagnostic capabilities of the method makes its use especially relevant in this severe retinal disease of premature newborns.

The significance of ultrasound biomicroscopy in the objective assessment of post-trabeculectomy bleb success

PURPOSE

To compare clinical characteristics and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) measurements of cases with functional and non-functional blebs, and to identify potential risk factors capable of affecting UBM parameters.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients aged 40-79 were included. Following trabeculectomy, cases were divided into two groups as those with functional bleb (Group 1, n = 20) and those with non-functional bleb (Group 2, n = 11). UBM was performed.

RESULTS

In Group 1 compared to Group 2, lower postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) (12.1 ± 1.7 vs 27.2 ± 3.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), greater bleb height (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 0.5 ± 0.3 mm, p < 0.001), greater scleral route visibility [16/20 (80%) vs 4/11 (36.4%), p = 0.023] and lower bleb reflectivity (1.8 ± 0.2 vs 2.4 ± 0.4, p = 0.015) were observed. In Group 1, as postoperative IOP decreased, bleb height and scleral route visibility increased (r = -0.387, p = 0.029 for bleb height; r = -0.374, p = 0.033 for scleral route), and bleb reflectivity decreased (r = 0.359, p = 0.042). In Group 1, as duration of preoperative antiglaucoma drug use increased, bleb reflectivity increased (r = 0.348, p = 0.046). Preoperative IOP and number of preoperative antiglaucoma drug use had no effect on UBM parameters in groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

UBM is useful in assessing bleb success. Lower bleb reflectivity, greater bleb height and greater scleral route visibility indicate that the bleb is functional. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating effects of preoperative IOP, number and duration of preoperative antiglaucoma drug use on UBM parameters. In cases with functional bleb, duration of preoperative drug use affects only bleb reflectivity, while postoperative IOP affects bleb height, scleral route visibility and bleb reflectivity.

[Outpatient management without day 1 clinical follow-up of patients undergoing uncomplicated filtering surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Although the general increase in ambulatory surgery allows for a 20% reduction in costs of hospitalization, the necessity of a day 1 postoperative visit remains the main problem for elderly patients or those who reside at considerable distance. For these reasons, in 2014, we decided to only see patients with uncomplicated filtering surgery at D5 and D21 and to replace the D1 visit with a telephone call. The primary goal of our study was to analyze a population of patients undergoing uncomplicated filtering surgery who were not seen at D1 and to describe the frequency of postoperative complications, intraocular pressure results and therapeutic management at D5 and D21.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective monocentric study in the department of ophthalmology. All patients (naïve of surgical treatment for glaucoma) underwent surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma in an ambulatory surgery unit between May 2014 and July 2016. A nurse made a phone call to the patients at day 1 and they responded to a standardized questionnaire. Depending upon their responses, the patients were seen quickly (<24hr) or on the systematic schedule at day 5 and day 21.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four eyes (126 patients) were included in our study. The mean preoperative IOP was 20.4±6.4mmHg. After the phone call, only five patients were examined before the first planned follow-up at day 5. For 3 of them, the examination revealed the presence of a hyphema, and their topical medication was changed. The other two patients had no treatment modifications. At day 5, the mean IOP was 10.6±5.9mmHg. Thirty-two eyes (22.2%) required a change in their medication at day 5. The mean IOP at day 21 was 12.9±4.6mmHg. Our success rate (IOP<21mmHg with no topical medication) at day 21 was 95.6%.

DISCUSSION

The guidelines for filtering glaucoma surgery recommend examining the patient at day 1 (or at least before day 3), day 8, day 15 and day 30 or more frequently according to the case. We replaced the day 1 visit with a telephone call. We did not note a substantial rate of complications due to the elimination of the D1 visit. The criteria of success of filtering glaucoma surgery vary in the literature, but our success rate at D21 seems to be similar that in the literature and may suggest that the day 1 visit is not necessary if the surgery for primary open angle glaucoma is uncomplicated.