Évaluation des performances visuelles après implantation d’une lentille intraoculaire torique à double anse en C

Visual and Refractive Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Biconvex Aspheric Toric Monofocal Intraocular with a Double C-Loop Haptic Design

Purpose

To show the visual and refractive outcomes in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism when bilaterally implanted with a biconvex aspheric toric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a double C-loop haptic-design.

Methods

Forty-seven cataract patients (94 eyes) with corneal astigmatism (≥0.75D) were implanted with the monofocal PODEYE toric IOL and assessed for 4-6 months post-surgery. Measurements included monocular and binocular uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), under both photopic and mesopic lighting conditions. Refraction, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (with and without glare), and rotational stability were also recorded at the last postoperative visit.

Results

At 4-6 months, 78.2% and 98.9% of eyes were within ±0.50D and ±1.00D of the target refraction, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder values were 0.09±0.35D and -0.36±0.35D, respectively. 76.5% and 98.8% of eyes presented a postoperative refractive cylinder of ≤0.50D and ≤1.00D, respectively. 91.5% and 100% of patients had a binocular UDVA and CDVA of ≥20/25, respectively. The mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.02±0.08 and -0.02±0.07 logMAR, respectively. Under mesopic conditions, 78.7% and 83.0% of patients presented a binocular UDVA and CDVA ≥20/32, respectively. The mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.15±0.11 and 0.12±0.11 logMAR, respectively. The patients showed good contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. The mean absolute IOL rotation was 1.22±2.21 degrees with 97.87% of eyes having a rotation of <10 degrees.

Conclusion

This study shows good visual and refractive outcomes for the PODEYE toric IOL when implanted bilaterally in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism.

Rotational stability and clinical outcomes after implantation of a new monofocal toric intraocular lens with double C-loop design

PURPOSE

To investigate rotational stability and visual outcomes of patients unilaterally or bilaterally implanted with a new monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL).

SETTING

Ophthalmology service, clinique Beausoleil, avenue de Lodève, Montpellier.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective study.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent routine cataract surgery with the PODEYE toric (BVI/PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) IOL using the ZEISS CALLISTO eye®. Biometry and keratometry data, refractive outcomes, rotational stability, and astigmatism correction were recorded. IOL rotation was evaluated using an image analysis technique. Postoperative assessments were performed at 1 week, 1 month, and 4 to 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes of 102 patients (136 eyes) were analyzed. Patients had a mean age of 74 years. Of the included eyes, 25% had an axial length greater than 24.5mm. Median postoperative IOL rotation from baseline (surgery) was 2̊. With the exception of one outlier (15̊ rotation), IOL rotation was ≤ 6̊ (1 month) and ≤ 10̊ (4-6 months) in 100% of the eyes. No surgical IOL re-positioning was required. Median postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was -0.08 logMAR, and median postoperative subjective cylinder was between 0.25 and 0.50 D.

CONCLUSION

The PODEYE toric IOL showed high rotational stability, allowing for correction of corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery.

[Posterior capsule opacification, glistenings and visual outcomes: 3 years after implantation of a new hydrophobic IOL]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcomes, the incidence of glistenings and posterior capsule opacification in a series of consecutive eyes with a new blue light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) SETTING: Service d'ophtalmologie, clinique Beausoleil, avenue de Lodève, Montpellier.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This study included a series of 66 eyes that underwent routine cataract surgery with PODEye (PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) monofocal IOL implantation between May 2011 and November 2011. These eyes were compared for glistenings with patients implanted with Acrysof material IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA) who had a routine postoperative examination between January 2015 and August 2015. The safety of the IOL was assessed by visual acuity outcomes, as well as rotational stability, centration and postoperative medication. The incidence and severity of glistenings were evaluated with the slit lamp. Glistenings and PCO were graded subjectively (0=absent; 1=moderate; 2=dense). Follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

The mean visual acuity after PODEye implantation was 0.98±0.05 (n=50) in decimal notation at 1 year, 0.98±0.06 at 1 week, (n=66), 1.00±0.01 at 3 weeks (n=64) and 0.99±0.02 at 3 months (n=59). The IOL displayed stable positioning in all axes. Glistenings of grade 2 were absent in the G-Free/PODEye group, whereas they were significantly present in the Acrysof group. One out of 43 eyes at 3-year follow-up underwent YAG capulotomy at 37 months. Sixty-six percent of eyes had no PCO (grade 0) at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The PODEye IOL was safe and stable. Glistenings grade 2 or more were not found with this blue light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic IOL. PCO occurrence was low at three years.

Investigation of a real-time location system of corneal astigmatic axis

Background

To construct a real-time computerized location system (RCLS) to analyze and display the axis of corneal astigmatism and to compare its accuracy with the Scheimpflug method.

Methods

Fifty-seven eyes of 39 volunteers with corneal astigmatism more than 1.00 diopter (D) were recruited. The RCLS was composed of a circular light-emitting diode (LED) light source, surgical microscope, surgical video system, computer and self-programming image analysis software. Scheimpflug imaging measurements (Pentacam HR, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) were performed on all subjects to determine the axis and power of corneal astigmatism. Thereafter, the axis of corneal astigmatism was analyzed in real-time and displayed by the RCLS on supine position, and videos were recorded. The MB-Ruler 4.0 software was used to measure the astigmatic axis. The accuracy of the RCLS was compared with the Scheimpflug method.

Results

The RCLS was able to display the axis of corneal astigmatism in real-time. The axial deviation of corneal astigmatism between the two methods was 0.63 ± 3.78° when astigmatism was 1.00 to 2.00 D and decreased to 0.06 ± 1.38° when astigmatism was greater than 2.00 D. A linear correlation of astigmatic axis was noted between the two methods: Axis_RCLS = 1.01 × Axis_Scheimpflug − 1.02 (R² = 0.998, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the RCLS agreed sufficiently well with the Scheimpflug method.

Conclusions

The RCLS can accurately analyze and display the axis for corneal astigmatism greater than 1.00 D in real-time. The RCLS simplifies marking procedures and may have potential clinical application to improve the postoperative visual outcomes in surgical correction of corneal astigmatism.

Stability of a Novel Intraocular Lens Design: Comparison of Two Trifocal Lenses

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes, rotational stability, and centration in a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing cataract surgery who were bilaterally implanted with two different trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a similar optical zone but different haptic shape.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (42 eyes) with cataract and less than 1.50 D of corneal astigmatism underwent implantation of one FineVision/MicoF IOL in one eye and one POD FineVision IOL in the contralateral eye (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) at IOA Madrid Innova Ocular, Madrid, Spain. IOL allocation was random. Outcome measures, all evaluated 3 months postoperatively, included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), and near (DCNVA) visual acuity (at 80, 40, and 25 cm) under photopic conditions, refraction, IOL centration, haptic rotation, dysphotopsia, objective quality of vision and aberration quantification, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, mean monocular UDVA, CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA (40 cm) under photopic conditions were 0.04 ± 0.07, 0.01 ± 0.04, 0.15 ± 0.11, and 0.16 ± 0.08 logMAR for the eyes implanted with the POD FineVision IOL and 0.03 ± 0.05, 0.01 ± 0.02, 0.17 ± 0.12, and 0.14 ± 0.08 logMAR for those receiving the FineVision/MicroF IOL. Moreover, the POD FineVision IOL showed similar centration (P> .05) and better rotational stability (P < .05) than the FineVision/MicroF IOL. Regarding halos, there was a minimal but statistically significant difference, obtaining better results with FineVision/MicroF. Full spectacle independence was reported by all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed similar visual outcomes for both trifocal IOLs under test (POD FineVision and FineVision/MicroF). However, the POD FineVision IOL showed better rotational stability, as afforded by its design. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(6):394-402.].

Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare a new diffractive trifocal toric lens with an apodized diffractive bifocal toric lens in terms of refractive and visual acuity (VA) outcomes, including low-contrast VA (LCVA), as well as the patient’s visual function 3 months after implantation.

Patients and methods

This is a randomized prospective study involving bilateral implantation of a trifocal toric or a bifocal toric lens. At 3 months postoperatively, the subject’s vision was tested both uncorrected and with his/her best distance correction at: distance (4 m), intermediate (63 cm), and near (40 cm). Binocular defocus curves were measured with no correction and with the subject’s best distance correction in place. Quality of vision was measured using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Results

A total of 22 patients were enrolled (eleven in each group). There was no statistically significant difference in the absolute change in measured rotation between 1 month and 3 months postoperatively between the two intraocular lens (IOL) groups (P=0.98). At 3 months, the postoperative refraction and distance VA by eye were similar between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the measured LCVA between groups (P=0.39). The defocus curve showed that at 67 cm, the trifocal toric lens had statistically significantly better VA when compared to the bifocal toric lens. There were no statistically significant differences by group for any of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores (P>0.26 in all cases).

Conclusion

The trifocal toric IOL improved the intermediate vision without negatively impacting visual function and distance, near, or low-contrast VA when compared to a bifocal toric IOL. The toric component of the trifocal lens effectively reduced astigmatism and provided good rotational stability.