Évaluation des propriétés biomécaniques de la cornée de patients glaucomateux et témoins par la technologie dynamique Scheimpflug de visualisation cornéenne

Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach

Over the last two decades, there has been growing interest in assessing corneal biomechanics in different diseases, such as keratoconus, glaucoma, and corneal disorders. Given the interaction and structural continuity between the cornea and sclera, evaluating corneal biomechanics may give us further insights into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, progression, and management of glaucoma. Therefore, some authorities have recommended baseline evaluations of corneal biomechanics in all glaucoma and glaucoma suspects patients. Currently, two devices (Ocular Response Analyzer and Corneal Visualization Schiempflug Technology) are commercially available for evaluating corneal biomechanics; however, each device reports different parameters, and there is a weak to moderate agreement between the reported parameters. Studies are further limited by the inclusion of glaucoma subjects taking topical prostaglandin analogues, which may alter corneal biomechanics and contribute to contradicting results, lack of proper stratification of patients, and misinterpretation of the results based on factors that are confounded by intraocular pressure changes. This review aims to summarize the recent evidence on corneal biomechanics in glaucoma patients and insights for future studies to address the current limitations of the literature studying corneal biomechanics.

Corneal Biomechanics Assessment with Ultra High Speed Scheimpflug Camera in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Compared with Healthy Subjects: A meta-analysis of the Literature

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis of the literature is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the differences in Corvis ST dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

A quantitative meta-analysis was conducted on articles published before September 10, 2021 identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Prospective studies comparing DCR Corvis ST parameter in high tension POAG and healthy controls were included. The random-effects model was conducted. Assessment of heterogeneity was based on the calculation of I². Funnel plots evaluation and meta-regression were performed in case of detection of high heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The selection process resulted in the inclusion of six articles. Pooled analysis revealed that POAG corneas respond to mechanical stimulus with a smaller concavity, showing lower deformation amplitude (DA) (CI95% -0.991 to -0.578; p < .001; I² = 0%), higher highest concavity radius (HCR; confidence interval [CI]95% -0.01 to 0.34; p = .058; I² = 6.7%), and lower peak distance (PD; CI95% -1.06 to -0.024; p = .040; I² = 86.5%). They also show a slower loading phase, with lower highest concavity time (HCT; CI95% -0.39 to -0.02; p = .029; I² = 3.3%) and lower applanation velocity-1 (CI95% -0.641 to -0.127; p = .003; I² = 34.6%), and a faster restoration to the original form, shown by lower applanation time-2 (CI95% -1.123 to -0.544; p = .001; I² = 44.8%) compared to healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

High tension POAG patients are characterized by stiffer corneas compared to healthy controls. These differences are valid also after removing the effect of age, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Corneal Stiffness and Its Relationship With Other Corneal Biomechanical and Nonbiomechanical Parameters in Myopic Eyes of Chinese Patients

PURPOSE

To investigate corneal stiffness and analyze its possible influence on other corneal biomechanical and nonbiomechanical parameters in myopic eyes of Chinese patients.

METHODS

A total of 387 healthy (right) myopic eyes were included in this study. Corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology was used to measure the corneal stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1), deformation amplitude ratio at 1.0 and at 2.0 mm, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP), and corneal deformation parameters during the first applanation (A1: A1-time, A1-length, and A1-velocity), second applanation (A2; A2-time, A2-length, and A2-velocity), and highest concavity (HC; HC-time, HC-radius, HC deformation amplitude, and HC peak distance). The Pentacam was used to evaluate central corneal thickness, mean corneal curvature (Km), anterior corneal central elevation, and corneal asphericity (Q value) of the anterior cornea.

RESULTS

The mean SP-A1 and bIOP values were 90.46 ± 15.39 mm Hg/mm and 13.5 ± 1.85 mm Hg, respectively. The SP-A1 increased with age (β = 0.41 [95% CI, 0.28%-0.54%]; P < 0.0001). Corneal stiffness was positively correlated with central corneal thickness, uncorrected intraocular pressure, and bIOP and was also significantly correlated with all corneal deformation parameters (P < 0.05), except A1-length, HC-time, and HC peak distance. Corneal stiffness was negatively correlated with central corneal elevation of the anterior surface (r = -0.124, P = 0.014) and mean corneal curvature (r = -0.114, P = 0.025) and positively correlated with the Q value of the anterior surface (r = 0.109, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal stiffness increased with age. Stronger corneal stiffness may be related to flattening of the cornea and higher intraocular pressure.

Influence of Pachymetry and Intraocular Pressure on Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters in Healthy Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of pachymetry, age, and intraocular pressure in normal patients and to provide normative values for all dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs) provided by dynamic Scheimpflug analysis.

METHODS

Seven hundred five healthy patients were included in this multicenter retrospective study. The biomechanical response data were analyzed to obtain normative values with their dependence on corrected and clinically validated intraocular pressure estimates developed using the finite element method (bIOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and age, and to evaluate the influence of bIOP, CCT, and age.

RESULTS

The results showed that all DCRs were correlated with bIOP except deflection amplitude (DefA) ratio, highest concavity (HC) radius, and inverse concave radius. The analysis of the relationship of DCRs with CCT indicated that HC radius, inverse concave radius, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio, and DefA ratio were correlated with CCT (rho values of 0.343, -0.407, -0.444, and -0.406, respectively). The age group subanalysis revealed that primarily whole eye movement followed by DA ratio and inverse concave radius were the parameters that were most influenced by age. Finally, custom software was created to compare normative values to imported examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

HC radius, inverse concave radius, DA ratio, and DefA ratio were shown to be suitable parameters to evaluate in vivo corneal biomechanics due to their independence from IOP and their correlation with pachymetry and age. The creation of normative values allows the interpretation of an abnormal examination without the need to match every case with another normal patient matched for CCT and IOP. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(8):550-561.].