1
|
Ben Ghezala I, Mariet AS, Benzenine E, Gabrielle PH, Baudin F, Quantin C, Creuzot-Garcher C. Incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following macular surgery in France between 2006 and 2016. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 243:91-97. [PMID: 35907474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the incidence of postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after macular surgery in France between 2006 and 2016 and identify associated factors. DESIGN Nationwide population-based cohort study. METHODS All surgical procedures for an epiretinal membrane or a macular hole performed in France from January 1, 2006 to October 31, 2016 were identified in the French national administrative database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information). We investigated the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment occurring within 90 days of a macular surgical procedure. RESULTS From January 1, 2006 to October 31, 2016, 152,034 macular surgical procedures for epiretinal membranes or macular holes were recorded in France. We identified 3,605 cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment occurring within 90 days of the procedure. The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was 2.37% overall, 1.95% for epiretinal membrane surgery and 3.43% for macular hole surgery. In multivariable Poisson regression analysis, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was associated with macular hole surgery (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.63-1.90; P < .001), history of cataract extraction in the previous year (IRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34; P = .001), age < 60 years (P < .001), and male gender (IRR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.51-1.76; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment within 90 days of macular surgery was 2.37% overall in France between 2006 and 2016 and it was higher for macular hole surgery than for epiretinal membrane surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inès Ben Ghezala
- Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital, Dijon, France; Inserm, CIC 1432, Clinical Investigation Center, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Mariet
- Inserm, CIC 1432, Clinical Investigation Center, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital, Dijon, France; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France; Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases (B2PHI), Inserm, UVSQ, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Eric Benzenine
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre-Henry Gabrielle
- Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital, Dijon, France; Eye and Nutrition Research Group, CSGA, UMR1324 INRAE, 6265 CNRS, Dijon, France
| | - Florian Baudin
- Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Quantin
- Inserm, CIC 1432, Clinical Investigation Center, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital, Dijon, France; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France; Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases (B2PHI), Inserm, UVSQ, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
- Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital, Dijon, France; Eye and Nutrition Research Group, CSGA, UMR1324 INRAE, 6265 CNRS, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bheemidi AR, Roan VD, Muste JC, Singh RP. Examining the Necessity of Postoperative Day-1 Review After Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2021; 52:513-518. [PMID: 34505803 DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20210818-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the necessity of the postoperative day-1 (POD1) review after pars plana vitrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The analysis included available literature that documented medical and surgical interventions performed on POD1 review after pars plana vitrectomy. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a binomial-normal model to analyze three data sets consisting of all interventions, medical interventions, and surgical interventions. Heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed. RESULTS POD1 reviews of 2,262 patients across 14 studies were examined to yield a total POD1 intervention rate estimate of 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-13.9). When stratified by medical or surgical intervention, the intervention rate estimates were 4.1% (95% CI, 1.4-11.6) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3-1.3), respectively. The most common complication requiring postoperative intervention was elevated intraocular pressure. CONCLUSION Given the wide confidence intervals of the estimated intervention rates, variability in postoperative practices, and range of interventions performed, the POD1 review cannot be discarded in its entirety. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:513-518.].
Collapse
|