1
|
Wang Q, Zhang Y, Liu W, Li Q, Zhang J, Knoll A, Zhou M, Jiang H, Ying Y. Toward Damage-Less Robotic Fragile Fruit Grasping: A Closed-Loop Force Control Method for Pneumatic-Driven Soft Gripper. Soft Robot 2024. [PMID: 39648843 DOI: 10.1089/soro.2023.0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Fragile fruit uploading and packaging are labor-intensive and time-consuming steps in postharvest industry. With the aging of the global population, it is supposed to develop robotic grasping systems to replace manual labor. However, damage-less grasping of fragile fruit is the key problem in robotization. Inappropriate grasping force will result in damage, early-stage bruise, or slip. Benefits from the advantages of softness and compliance of a pneumatic-driven soft gripper have been widely adopted for agricultural product and food manipulation. Nevertheless, pneumatic gripper is a complex, multivariable, nonlinear, and long time-delay control system, which is difficult to achieve robust closed-loop grasping force control. In this study, we aim to solve this problem and developed a robotic grasping force control system with pneumatic gripper and matrix force sensor. The force distribution condition was explored to tackle the problem in changing of the main contact point. A double closed-loop control method was proposed based on Kalman filter (KF) and proportion integration differentiation controller with dead band. The external and internal control loops were force controller and air pressure of the pump controller, respectively. The double closed-loop controller with dead band achieved robust grasping force control through air pressure. The experimental results validated the effectiveness of the KF method for denoising and the matrix force visualization method for exploring grasping mechanism. Ablation studies were carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the multiple grasping force sensing units in matrix form and the dead band in the controller. The maximum steady-state error was 0.07 N. In addition, the generalization performance and the antidisturbance ability of the grasping force control system was also validated. In summary, the problem in closed-loop control of the grasping force for pneumatic gripper has been solved in our study, and the method in this research is potential to be deployed in fruit postharvest industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyu Wang
- College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of on Site Processing Equipment for Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
- TAMS (Technical Aspects of Multimodal Systems), Department of Informatics, University of Hamburg, D - 22527 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Youchao Zhang
- College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of on Site Processing Equipment for Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of on Site Processing Equipment for Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- TAMS (Technical Aspects of Multimodal Systems), Department of Informatics, University of Hamburg, D - 22527 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jianwei Zhang
- TAMS (Technical Aspects of Multimodal Systems), Department of Informatics, University of Hamburg, D - 22527 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alois Knoll
- Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mingchuan Zhou
- College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of on Site Processing Equipment for Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huanyu Jiang
- College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of on Site Processing Equipment for Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yibin Ying
- College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of on Site Processing Equipment for Agricultural Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hassoun A, Jagtap S, Trollman H, Garcia-Garcia G, Duong LNK, Saxena P, Bouzembrak Y, Treiblmaier H, Para-López C, Carmona-Torres C, Dev K, Mhlanga D, Aït-Kaddour A. From Food Industry 4.0 to Food Industry 5.0: Identifying technological enablers and potential future applications in the food sector. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2024; 23:e370040. [PMID: 39437193 DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.70040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Although several food-related fields have yet to fully grasp the speed and breadth of the fourth industrial revolution (also known as Industry 4.0), growing literature from other sectors shows that Industry 5.0 (referring to the fifth industrial revolution) is already underway. Food Industry 4.0 has been characterized by the fusion of physical, digital, and biological advances in food science and technology, whereas future Food Industry 5.0 could be seen as a more holistic, multidisciplinary, and multidimensional approach. This review will focus on identifying potential enabling technologies of Industry 5.0 that could be harnessed to shape the future of food in the coming years. We will review the state-of-the-art studies on the use of innovative technologies in various food and agriculture applications over the last 5 years. In addition, opportunities and challenges will be highlighted, and future directions and conclusions will be drawn. Preliminary evidence suggests that Industry 5.0 is the outcome of an evolutionary process and not of a revolution, as is often claimed. Our results show that regenerative and/or conversational artificial intelligence, the Internet of Everything, miniaturized and nanosensors, 4D printing and beyond, cobots and advanced drones, edge computing, redactable blockchain, metaverse and immersive techniques, cyber-physical systems, digital twins, and sixth-generation wireless and beyond are likely to be among the main driving technologies of Food Industry 5.0. Although the framework, vision, and value of Industry 5.0 are becoming popular research topics in various academic and industrial fields, the agri-food sector has just started to embrace some aspects and dimensions of Industry 5.0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdo Hassoun
- Sustainable AgriFoodtech Innovation & Research (SAFIR), Arras, France
- College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Sandeep Jagtap
- Division of Engineering Logistics, Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Sustainable Manufacturing Systems Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK
| | - Hana Trollman
- School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Guillermo Garcia-Garcia
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Linh N K Duong
- Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Prateek Saxena
- School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Yamine Bouzembrak
- Information Technology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Horst Treiblmaier
- School of International Management, Modul University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Carlos Para-López
- Department of Agrifood System Economics, Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Granada, Spain
| | - Carmen Carmona-Torres
- Department of Agrifood System Economics, Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Granada, Spain
- Institute of Regional Development, University of Granada, Rector López Argüeta, s/n. 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Kapal Dev
- ADAPT Centre and Department of Computer Science, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon, and Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India
| | - David Mhlanga
- College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Abderrahmane Aït-Kaddour
- Unité Mixte de Recherche sur le Fromage UMRF, Université Clermont-Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tetteh AA, Dzomeku VM, Barnie PA, Gyamfi A, Arhin AK, Adjei BN, Barnie B, Nakua EK, Mock C, Donkor P. Prevalence, types and outcome of injuries among abattoir workers in Ghana. BMC Res Notes 2024; 17:265. [PMID: 39277769 PMCID: PMC11401250 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06934-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many places in the world, workers in the meat processing industry report high incidence of injuries. Details of such injuries are not well known for Ghana or much of Africa. METHODS A cross-sectional survey involving 300 workers from three major meat processing facilities in the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana was carried out using a structured questionnaire from April to June 2023. The prevalence, types and outcome of injuries among workers were assessed. Test of association was established by Chi square analysis. RESULTS Over the prior 6 months, the prevalence of injury was 83.0%. Among the various injury types, lacerations had the highest prevalence (46.0%) followed by musculoskeletal pain (16.7%) bone fractures (14.0%), swelling (13.0%), burns and scalds (7.3%), and dislocations/sprains/strains (6.7%). More than half (58.9%) of injuries sustained were moderately severe (2-7 days of lost work) and nearly half (42.0%) required immediate medical attention. Gender, employment status, wages, availability and use of safety equipment were significantly associated with injuries among abattoir workers. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of injuries among abattoir workers in Kumasi, Ghana demonstrates a large public health burden requiring attention and improved enforcement through occupational safety interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Aban Tetteh
- School of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
- Ear, Nose and Throat Nursing School, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
| | | | | | - Adwoa Gyamfi
- School of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Ato Kwamina Arhin
- Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, The Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (AAMUSTED), Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Benjamin Noble Adjei
- School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Bernard Barnie
- School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Emmanuel Kwaku Nakua
- School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Charles Mock
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter Donkor
- Department of Surgery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Molina JRG, Frías-Celayeta JM, Bolton DJ, Botinestean C. A Comprehensive Review of Cured Meat Products in the Irish Market: Opportunities for Reformulation and Processing. Foods 2024; 13:746. [PMID: 38472858 DOI: 10.3390/foods13050746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Cured meat products constitute one of the meat categories commonly consumed in Ireland and has been part of the Irish cuisine and diet for many years. Ham, gammon, and bacon are some of the products that involve curing as part of the traditional processing methods. Common among these products are high levels of salt and the addition of nitrites. These products undergo processing treatments to create variety, preserve shelf-life, and develop their unique quality and safety characteristics. However, consumers are becoming more conscious of the level of processing involved in these products, and the effects of some components and ingredients might be perceived as unhealthy. Meat product developers have been exploring ways to reduce the amount of ingredients such as salt, saturated fat, and chemical preservatives (e.g., nitrites), which are linked to health concerns. This is a challenging task as these ingredients play an important techno-functional role in the products' quality, safety, and identity. While innovative processing techniques are being introduced and progress has been made in reformulation and packaging technologies, much is still unknown, especially regarding the applicability of many of the proposed interventions to a wide range of meat products and their sustainability at the industrial scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Roland G Molina
- Food Industry Development Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Food Science and Environmental Health, Technological University Dublin, D07 H6K8 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jesús M Frías-Celayeta
- Environmental Sustainability and Health Institute, Technological University Dublin, D07 H6K8 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Declan J Bolton
- Food Safety Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cristina Botinestean
- Food Industry Development Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wright R, Parekh S, White R, Losey DP. Safely and autonomously cutting meat with a collaborative robot arm. Sci Rep 2024; 14:299. [PMID: 38168145 PMCID: PMC10762048 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50569-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Labor shortages in the United States are impacting a number of industries including the meat processing sector. Collaborative technologies that work alongside humans while increasing production abilities may support the industry by enhancing automation and improving job quality. However, existing automation technologies used in the meat industry have limited collaboration potential, low flexibility, and high cost. The objective of this work was to explore the use of a robot arm to collaboratively work alongside a human and complete tasks performed in a meat processing facility. Toward this objective, we demonstrated proof-of-concept approaches to ensure human safety while exploring the capacity of the robot arm to perform example meat processing tasks. In support of human safety, we developed a knife instrumentation system to detect when the cutting implement comes into contact with meat within the collaborative space. To demonstrate the capability of the system to flexibly conduct a variety of basic meat processing tasks, we developed vision and control protocols to execute slicing, trimming, and cubing of pork loins. We also collected a subjective evaluation of the actions from experts within the U.S. meat processing industry. On average the experts rated the robot's performance as adequate. Moreover, the experts generally preferred the cuts performed in collaboration with a human worker to cuts completed autonomously, highlighting the benefits of robotic technologies that assist human workers rather than replace them. Video demonstrations of our proposed framework can be found here: https://youtu.be/56mdHjjYMVc .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Wright
- Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Sagar Parekh
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Goodwin Hall, 635 Prices Fork Road, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
| | - Robin White
- Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Dylan P Losey
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Goodwin Hall, 635 Prices Fork Road, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Derossi A, Di Palma E, Moses JA, Santhoshkumar P, Caporizzi R, Severini C. Avenues for non-conventional robotics technology applications in the food industry. Food Res Int 2023; 173:113265. [PMID: 37803578 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
Robots in manufacturing alleviate hazardous environmental conditions, reduce the physical/mental stress of the workers, maintain high precision for repetitive movements, reduce errors, speed up production, and minimize production costs. Although robots have pervaded many industrial sectors and domestic environments, the experiments in the food sectors are limited to pick-and-place operations and meat processing while we are assisting new attention in gastronomy. Given the great performances of the robots, there would be many other intriguing applications to explore which could usher the transition to precision food manufacturing. This review wants open thoughts and opinions on the use of robots in different food operations. First, we reviewed the recent advances in common applications - e.g. novel sensors, end-effectors, and robotic cutting. Then, we analyzed the use of robots in other operations such as cleaning, mixing/kneading, dough manipulation, precision dosing/cooking, and additive manufacturing. Finally, the most recent improvements of robotics in gastronomy with their use in restaurants/bars and domestic environments, are examined. The comprehensive analyses and the critical discussion highlighted the needs of further scientific understanding and exploitation activities aimed to fill the gap between the laboratory-scale results and the validation in the relevant environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Derossi
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Italy
| | - E Di Palma
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Italy
| | - J A Moses
- Computational Modeling and Nanoscale Processing Unit, National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management - Thanjavur, MoFPI, Govt. of India, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu 613005, India
| | - P Santhoshkumar
- Computational Modeling and Nanoscale Processing Unit, National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management - Thanjavur, MoFPI, Govt. of India, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu 613005, India
| | - R Caporizzi
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Italy.
| | - C Severini
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meat 4.0: Principles and Applications of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Meat Industry. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12146986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Meat 4.0 refers to the application the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) technologies in the meat sector. Industry 4.0 components, such as robotics, Internet of Things, Big Data, augmented reality, cybersecurity, and blockchain, have recently transformed many industrial and manufacturing sectors, including agri-food sectors, such as the meat industry. The need for digitalised and automated solutions throughout the whole food supply chain has increased remarkably during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review will introduce the concept of Meat 4.0, highlight its main enablers, and provide an updated overview of recent developments and applications of Industry 4.0 innovations and advanced techniques in digital transformation and process automation of the meat industry. A particular focus will be put on the role of Meat 4.0 enablers in meat processing, preservation and analyses of quality, safety and authenticity. Our literature review shows that Industry 4.0 has significant potential to improve the way meat is processed, preserved, and analysed, reduce food waste and loss, develop safe meat products of high quality, and prevent meat fraud. Despite the current challenges, growing literature shows that the meat sector can be highly automated using smart technologies, such as robots and smart sensors based on spectroscopy and imaging technology.
Collapse
|