Aspirin and verapamil increase the sensitivity of Candida albicans to caspofungin under planktonic and biofilm conditions

Verapamil Enhances the Activity of Caspofungin against Cryptococcus neoformans Coincides with Inhibited Ca2+ /CN Pathway and Damage with Cell Wall Integrity

Currently, the therapeutic effect on cryptococcal infection patients is hindered by toxicity and drug resistance, making it urgent to discover alternative antifungals. Calcium channel blockers, verapamil (VER), have shown effective antifungal effects in several fungi. Here, we found that VER has a significant antifungal effect on Cryptococcus neoformans (C. neoformans). Furthermore, VER has significant synergistic effects with multiple antifungals, even caspofungin (CAS). We confirmed that VER and CAS had a synergistic antifungal effect in the Galleria mellonella. We conducted in-depth research on the possible mechanism of the synergistic impact of VER and CAS. After treatment with VER, the chitosan content of C. neoformans ' cell wall decreased and in dopamine liquid culture medium, we observed the leakage of melanin. Through cell wall fluorescence staining and stress sensitivity analysis, we further demonstrated that VER impaired the integrity of the C. neoformans' cell wall. Another side, VER+CAS modification of C. neoformans membrane permeability, leading to intracellular ROS accumulation and mitochondrial membrane potential changes. VER eliminated the cytoplasmic calcium fluctuations caused by CAS stimulation and down-regulated the genes expression associated with the calcineurin pathway. In addition, we found that the enzyme activity of chitin deacetylase of C. neoformans is significantly influenced by the presence of Ca2+, suggesting that the use of VER may affect the activity. In summary, the synergistic antifungal effect of VER and CAS makes them effective and promising candidates for fungal treatment.

Can nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) be repurposed for fungal infection?

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an important class of anti-inflammatory drugs widely used for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, mild-to-moderate pain, and fever. This review aimed to explain the functional role and possible mechanisms of the antifungal effects of NSAIDs alone or in combination with antifungal drugs in vitro and in vivo. Several studies reported that NSAIDs such as aspirin, ibuprofen, diclofenac, indomethacin, ketorolac, celecoxib, flurbiprofen, and nimesulide had antifungal activities in vitro, either fungistatic or fungicidal, against different strains of Candida, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Microsporum, and Trichophyton species. These drugs inhibited biofilm adhesion and development, and yeast-to-hypha conversion which may be related to a prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)/PGEx-dependent mechanism. Modulating PGE2 levels by NSAIDs during fungal infection can be introduced as a possible mechanism to overcome. In addition, some important mechanisms of the antifungal activities of NSAIDs and their new derivatives on fungi and host immune responses are summarized. Overall, we believe that using NSAIDs along with classical antifungal drugs has the potential to be investigated as a novel therapeutic strategy in clinical studies. Furthermore, combination therapy can help manage resistant strains, increase the efficacy of antifungal drugs, and reduce toxicity.

In Vitro Effect of Three-Antibiotic Combinations plus Potential Antibiofilm Agents against Biofilm-Producing Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare Clinical Isolates

Patients with chronic pulmonary diseases infected by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) often develop complications and suffer from treatment failure due to biofilm formation. There is a lack of correlation between in vitro susceptibility tests and the treatment of clinical isolates producing biofilm. We performed susceptibility tests of 10 different three-drug combinations, including two recommended in the guidelines, in biofilm forms of eight MAC clinical isolates. Biofilm developed in the eight isolates following incubation of the inoculum for 3 weeks. Then, the biofilm was treated with three-drug combinations with and without the addition of potential antibiofilm agents (PAAs). Biofilm bactericidal concentrations (BBCs) were determined using the Vizion lector system. All selected drug combinations showed synergistic activity, reducing BBC values compared to those treated with single drugs, but BBC values remained high enough to treat patients. However, with the addition of PAAs, the BBCs steadily decreased, achieving similar values to the combinations in planktonic forms and showing synergistic activity in all the combinations and in both species. In conclusion, three-drug combinations with PAAs showed synergistic activity in biofilm forms of MAC isolates. Our results suggest the need for clinical studies introducing PAAs combined with antibiotics for the treatment of patients with pulmonary diseases infected by MAC.

Antifungal activity and potential mechanism of action of caspofungin in combination with ribavirin against Candida albicans

The number of invasive fungal infections has increased dramatically, resulting in high morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. With increasing use of caspofungin (CAS), resistant strains have emerged frequently and led to limitations in the treatment of patients with severe invasive Candida albicans infections. Combination therapy is an important method to deal with this issue. As such, this study investigated the activity of CAS in combination with ribavirin (RBV) against C. albicans. The results of this in-vitro study showed that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CAS and RBV when they were used as monotherapy were 0.5-1 μg/mL and 2-8 μg/mL, respectively, while the MIC of CAS decreased from 0.5-1 μg/mL to 0.0625-0.25 μg/mL when used in combination with RBV, with a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) ≤0.5. In addition, the RBV + CAS combination group displayed synergistic effects against C. albicans biofilm over 4 h; the sessile MIC (sMIC) of CAS decreased from 0.5-1 µg/mL to 0.0625-0.25µg/mL and the sMIC of RBV decreased from 4-16 µg/mL to 1-2 µg/mL, with FICI <0.5. The survival of C. albicans-infected Galleria mellonella was prolonged, the fungal burden was decreased, and the area of tissue damage was reduced after combination therapy. Further study showed that the mechanisms of action of the synergistic effect were related to the inhibition of biofilm formation, the inhibition of hyphal growth, and the activation of metacaspases, but were not related to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. It is hoped that these findings will contribute to the understanding of drug resistance in C. albicans, and provide new insights for the application of RBV.

Aspirin and Infection: A Narrative Review

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is one of the most commonly used drugs in the world. It derives from the extract of white willow bark, whose therapeutic potential was known in Egypt since 1534 BC. ASA’s pharmacological effects are historically considered secondary to its anti-inflammatory, platelet-inhibiting properties; however, human studies demonstrating a pro-inflammatory effect of ASA exist. It is likely that we are aware of only part of ASA’s mechanisms of action; moreover, the clinical effect is largely dependent on dosages. During the past few decades, evidence of the anti-infective properties of ASA has emerged. We performed a review of such research in order to provide a comprehensive overview of ASA and viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections, as well as ASA’s antibiofilm properties.

Cotreatment with Aspirin and Azole Drugs Increases Sensitivity of Candida albicans in vitro

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the effects of aspirin (acetyl salicylic acid [ASA]) combined with fluconazole (FCA), itraconazole (ITR), or voriconazole (VRC) on Candida albicans under planktonic and biofilm conditions.

Methods

A total of 39 clinical C. albicans strains were used to perform the in vitro drug sensitivity assay under different conditions using the M27-A4 broth microdilution method. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values were calculated. C. albicans ZY23 was chosen for the further analyses.

Results

Under planktonic conditions, the half maximal MIC (MIC₅₀) values of FCA, ITR, and VRC were 64-0.5 μg/mL, 32-0.0625 μg/mL, and 16-0.125 μg/mL, respectively, when applied, whereas in combination with ASA, the values decreased to 32-0.25 μg/mL, 8-0.0313 μg/mL, and 8-0.0313 μg/mL, respectively. Under biofilm conditions, FCA, ITR, or VRC alone showed MIC₅₀ values of 128-8 μg/mL, 32-4 μg/mL, and 32-0.5 μg/mL, whereas in combination with ASA the values were decreased to 32-0.5 μg/mL, 16-0.5 μg/mL, and 8-0.0625 μg/mL, respectively. Analysis of the FICI showed that the sensitization rate of ASA to FCA, ITR, and FCA under planktonic conditions was 43.59%, whereas the sensitization rates of ASP to FCA, ITR, and FCA under biofilm conditions were 46.15%, 46.15%, and 48.72%, respectively. Additionally, the time-growth and time-kill curves of C. albicans ZY23 further verified the synergistic effects of ASA on azole drugs.

Conclusion

ASA may act as an enhancer of the inhibitory effects of azole drugs on the growth of clinical C. albicans under planktonic and biofilm conditions.