Real-world clinical outcomes of meropenem/vaborbactam for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam versus Best-Available Therapy in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections

Antimicrobial resistance is increasingly concerning, causing millions of deaths and a high cost burden. Given that carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are particularly concerning due to their ability to develop structural modifications and produce antibiotic-degrading enzymes, leading to high resistance levels, we sought to summarize the available data on the efficacy and safety regarding the combination of meropenem-vaborbactam (MV) versus the best available therapy (BAT). Articles related to our objective were searched in the PubMed and Scopus databases inception to July 2024. To assess the quality of the studies, we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, RoB2. The outcomes were pooled as a risk ratio (RR) and a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). A total of four published studies were involved: one retrospective cohort study and three phase 3 trials, including 432 patients treated with MV and 426 patients treated with BAT (mono/combination therapy with polymyxins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, colistin, and tigecycline; or ceftazidime-avibactam; or piperacillin-tazobactam). No significant difference in the clinical response rate was observed between MV and the comparators at the TOC (RR = 1.29, 95%CI [0.92, 1.80], p = 0.14) and EOT (RR = 1.66, 95%CI [0.58, 4.76], p = 0.34) visits. MV was associated with a similar microbiological response as the comparators at TOC (RR = 1.63, 95%CI [0.85, 3.11], p = 0.14) and EOT assessment (RR = 1.16, 95%CI [0.88, 1.54], p = 0.14). In the pooled analysis of the four studies, 28-day all-cause mortality was lower for MV than the control groups (RR = 0.47, 95%CI [0.24, 0.92], p = 0.03). MV was associated with a similar risk of adverse events (AEs) as comparators (RR = 0.79, 95%CI [0.53, 1.17], p = 0.23). Additionally, MV was associated with fewer renal-related AEs than the comparators (RR = 0.32, 95%CI [0.15, 0.66], p = 0.002). MV was associated with a similar risk of treatment discontinuation due to AEs (RR = 0.76, 95%CI [0.38, 1.49], p = 0.42) or drug-related AEs (RR = 0.56, 95%CI [0.28, 1.10], p = 0.09) as the comparators. In conclusion, MV presents a promising therapeutic option for treating CRE infections, demonstrating similar clinical and microbiological responses as other comparators, with potential advantages in mortality outcomes and renal-related AEs.

Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With KPC-Kp Infections Treated With Meropenem Vaborbactam: An Observational Multicenter Study

Background

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a recent and promising option for the treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections, including those resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of observational data from 19 Italian hospitals on use and outcomes of patients treated with meropenem-vaborbactam for at least ≥24 hours for KPC-Kp infections. Crude and propensity-weighted multiple Cox regression models were performed to ascertain risk factors independently associated with 30-day mortality.

Results

The cohort included 342 adults with bloodstream infections (n = 172) and nonbacteremic infections (n = 170), of which 107 were lower respiratory tract infections, 30 were complicated urinary tract infections, and 33 were infections involving other sites. Most infections (62.3%) were managed with meropenem-vaborbactam monotherapy, or in combination with at least 1 other active drug (usually fosfomycin, tigecycline, or gentamicin) (37.7%). The 30-day mortality rate was 31.6% (108/342). In multiple Cox regression model, 30-day mortality was independently associated with septic shock at infection onset, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3, dialysis, concomitant COVID-19, and INCREMENT score ≥ 8. Administration of meropenem-vaborbactam within 48 hours from infection onset was a negative predictor of mortality. All predictors, except administration of meropenem-vaborbactam within 48 hours, remained significant when the multiple Cox regression model was repeated after adjustment for the propensity score for receipt of combination therapy.

Conclusions

Despite the limits of a retrospective study, the data derived from this multicenter cohort provide additional evidence on the efficacy of meropenem-vaborbactam in treating severe KPC-Kp infections, even when used as monotherapy.

How to use new antibiotics in the therapy of serious multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections are becoming more common and pose a serious threat to both individual patients and the population as a whole. Treatment of these infections can be difficult and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss information and strategies for using new antibiotics to combat these infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Eight new antibiotics represent possible means to treat multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections. Although no new mechanisms of action are present amongst these new antibiotics, novel additions to previously utilized mechanisms have been shown to be viable options for treatment of highly resistant organisms.

SUMMARY

The novel antibiotics considered in this review have varying data on their use as empiric treatment of patients at high risk for multidrug resistant organisms and as final therapy for identified multidrug resistant organisms. Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relabactam have the best support evidence for use in this patient population.

Antibiotics in development for multiresistant gram-negative bacilli

The rapid increase in antibiotic(ATB) resistance among Gram-negative bacilli(BGN), especially in strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, with high resistance patterns (XDR), poses a huge threat to health systems worldwide. In the last decade, different ATBs have been developed against XDR, some of which combine a lactam β along with a β-lactamase inhibitor, while others use non-β-lactam inhibitors. Most of them have adequate "in vitro" activity on several β-lactamases of class A, C and D of Ambler. However, combinations such as Ceftazidime/avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Meropenem/vaborbactam have no activity against metallo-β-lactamases(MβL). New combinations such as Aztreonan/AVI, Cefepime/Zidebactam, or new cephalosporins such as Cefiderocol, have efficacy against MβL enzymes. Although some of these combinations are already approved and in the commercialization phase, many of them have yet to define their place within the treatment of microorganisms with high resistance through clinical studies.