In vitro-obtained meropenem-vaborbactam resistance mechanisms among clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates

In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the blaKPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo blaKPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the blaKPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and blaKPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various blaKPC-2 variants, including blaKPC-25, blaKPC-127, blaKPC-100, blaKPC-128, blaKPC-137, blaKPC-138, blaKPC-144 and blaKPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased blaKPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as blaKPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the blaKPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a blaKPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from blaKPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The blaKPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to blaKPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

Mutant prevention concentrations, in vitro resistance evolution dynamics, and mechanisms of resistance to imipenem and imipenem/relebactam in carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates showing ceftazidime/avibactam resistance

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants selected during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment usually develop susceptibility to carbapenems and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors, such as imipenem and imipenem/relebactam. We analyzed imipenem and imipenem/relebactam single-step mutant frequencies, resistance development trajectories and differentially selected resistance mechanisms using two representative K. pneumoniae isolates that had developed ceftazidime/avibactam resistance during therapy (ST512/KPC-31 and ST258/KPC-35). Mutant frequencies and mutant prevention concentrations were measured in Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing incremental concentrations of imipenem or imipenem/relebactam. Resistance dynamics were determined after incubation for 7 days in 10 mL MH tubes containing incremental concentrations of each antibiotic or combination, up to 64 times their baseline MIC. Two colonies per strain from each experiment were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing. The impact of KPC variants identified in resistant mutants on β-lactam resistance was investigated by cloning experiments. Imipenem/relebactam suppressed the emergence of resistant mutants at lower concentrations than imipenem, slowed down resistance development for both strains, and the resulting mutants yielded lower MICs of carbapenems and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors than those selected with imipenem alone. Characterization of resistant mutants revealed that imipenem resistance was mainly caused by inactivation of OmpK36 and mutations in the KPC β-lactamase. Imipenem/relebactam-resistant mutants also maintained OmpK36 alterations, but mutations in KPC were much less frequent compared with those selected with imipenem alone. Genetic and biochemical characterization of the KPC derivatives identified in the resistant mutants confirmed their role in carbapenem resistance. Our data positions imipenem/relebactam as an attractive therapeutic option for combating ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections.

MultiRapid ATB NP test for detecting concomitant susceptibility and resistance of last-resort novel antibiotics available to treat multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales infections

BACKGROUND

Recently developed therapeutics against Gram-negative bacteria include the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), and imipenem-relebatam (IPR), and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol (FDC). The aim of this study was to develop a test for rapid identification of susceptibility/resistance to CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC for Enterobacterales in a single test for rapid clinical decision making.

METHODS

The MultiRapid ATB NP test is based on the detection of glucose metabolism occurring after bacterial growth in the presence of defined concentrations of CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC, followed by visual detection of colour change of the pH indicator red phenol (red to yellow) generated by the acidification of the medium upon bacterial growth. This test is performed in 96-well microplates. The MultiRapid ATB NP test was evaluated using 78 Enterobacterales isolates and compared to the reference method broth microdilution.

RESULTS

The MultiRapid ATB NP test displayed 97.0% (confidence interval [CI] 92.6-98.8) sensitivity, 97.7% (CI 94.3-99.1) specificity, and 97.4% (CI 95.0-98.7) accuracy. The results were obtained after 3 h of incubation at 35 °C ± 2 °C, representing at least a 15-h gain-of-time compared with currently used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.

CONCLUSION

The MultiRapid ATB NP test provided accurate results for the concomitant detection of susceptibility/resistance to CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC in Enterobacterales, independent of the resistance mechanism. This test may be suitable for implementation in any microbiology routine laboratory.

Activity of cefiderocol and innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against isogenic strains of Escherichia coli expressing single and double β-lactamases under high and low permeability conditions

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the impact of the most clinically relevant β-lactamases and their interplay with low outer membrane permeability on the activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam against recombinant Escherichia coli strains.

METHODS

We constructed 82 E. coli laboratory transformants expressing the main β-lactamases circulating in Enterobacterales (70 expressing single β-lactamase and 12 producing double carbapenemase) under high (E. coli TG1) and low (E. coli HB4) permeability conditions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by reference broth microdilution.

RESULTS

Aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam were active against all E. coli TG1 transformants. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/enmetazobactam were also highly active, but unstable against most of MBL-producing transformants. Combination of β-lactamases with porin deficiency (E. coli HB4) did not significantly affect the activity of aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol or meropenem/nacubactam, but limited the effectiveness of the rest of carbapenem- and cefepime-based combinations. Double-carbapenemase production resulted in the loss of activity of most of the compounds tested, an effect particularly evident for those E. coli HB4 transformants in which MBLs were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the promising activity that cefiderocol and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors have against recombinant E. coli strains expressing widespread β-lactamases, including when these are combined with low permeability or other enzymes. Aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam and meropenem/nacubactam will help to mitigate to some extent the urgency of new compounds able to resist MBL action, although NDM enzymes represent a growing challenge against which drug development efforts are still needed.

Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship of the Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are a major public health threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. The introduction of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) has, however, altered the treatment options for such pathogens. Thus, four new BL/BLI combinations-namely, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and ceftolozane/tazobactam-have been approved for infections attributed to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nevertheless, although these antimicrobials are increasingly being used in place of other drugs such as polymyxins, their optimal clinical use is still challenging. Furthermore, there is evidence that resistance to these agents might be increasing, so urgent measures should be taken to ensure their continued effectiveness. Therefore, clinical laboratories play an important role in the judicious use of these new antimicrobial combinations by detecting and characterizing carbapenem resistance, resolving the presence and type of carbapenemase production, and accurately determining the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) for BL/BLIs. These three targets must be met to ensure optimal BL/BLIs use and prevent unnecessary exposure that could lead to the development of resistance. At the same time, laboratories must ensure that results are interpreted in a timely manner to avoid delays in appropriate treatment that might be detrimental to patient safety. Thus, we herein present an overview of the indications and current applications of the new antimicrobial combinations and explore the diagnostic limitations regarding both carbapenem resistance detection and the interpretation of MIC results. Moreover, we suggest the use of alternative narrower-spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility testing and present data regarding the effect of synergies between BL/BLIs and other antimicrobials. Finally, in order to address the absence of a standardized approach to using the novel BL/BLIs, we propose a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm, which can be modified based on local epidemiological criteria. This framework could also be expanded to incorporate other new antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol, or currently unavailable BL/BLIs such as aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime/taniborbactam.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: the role of plasmids in emergence, dissemination, and evolution of a major clinical challenge

INTRODUCTION

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a major agent of healthcare-associated infections and a cause of some community-acquired infections, including severe bacteremic infections associated with metastatic abscesses in liver and other organs. Clinical relevance is compounded by its outstanding propensity to evolve antibiotic resistance. In particular, the emergence and dissemination of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae has posed a major challenge due to the few residual treatment options, which have only recently been expanded by some new agents. The epidemiological success of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-Kp) is mainly linked with clonal lineages that produce carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes (carbapenemases) encoded by plasmids.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we provide an updated overview on the mechanisms underlying the emergence and dissemination of CR-Kp, focusing on the role that plasmids have played in this phenomenon and in the co-evolution of resistance and virulence in K. pneumoniae.

EXPERT OPINION

CR-Kp have disseminated on a global scale, representing one of the most important contemporary public health issues. These strains are almost invariably associated with complex multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotypes, which can also include recently approved antibiotics. The heterogeneity of the molecular bases responsible for these phenotypes poses significant hurdles for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination, the Future in Eradicating Multidrug Resistance

Due to the fact that there is a steadily increasing trend in the area of antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms, there is a need to look for new treatment alternatives. One of them is the search for new β-lactamase inhibitors and combining them with β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of increasing the low-dose efficacy, as well as lowering the resistance potential of bacterial strains. This review presents the positive effect of meropenem in combination with a vaborbactam (MER-VAB). This latest antibiotic-inhibitor combination has found particular use in the treatment of infections with the etiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Gram-negative bacteria, with a high degree of resistance to available antimicrobial drugs.

Rapid Aztreonam/Avibactam NP test for detection of aztreonam/avibactam susceptibility/resistance in Enterobacterales

Aztreonam-avibactam (AZA), a newly developed β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is a treatment option for infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including metallo-ß-lactamase producers, regardless of additional production of broad-spectrum serine-ß-lactamases. However, AZA-resistance has already been reported in Enterobacterales and its early detection could be a valuable tool for faster and more accurate clinical decision-making. We therefore developed a rapid culture-based test for the identification of AZA resistance among multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. The Rapid Aztreonam/Avibactam NP test is based on resazurin reduction when bacterial growth occurs in the presence of AZA at 8/4 µg/mL (protocol 1) or 12/4 µg/mL (protocol 2). Given the absence of guidelines on AZA susceptibility testing, two tentative breakpoints were indeed used to categorize AZA-susceptible isolates: ≤4 µg/mL in protocol 1 and ≤ 8 µg/mL in protocol 2. Bacterial growth was visually detectable by a blue-to-purple or blue-to-pink color change of the medium. A total of 78 enterobacterial isolates (among which 34 AZA-resistant and 13 AZA-resistant according to protocols 1 and 2, respectively) were used to evaluate the test performance using protocol 1 or protocol 2. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were found to be 100% and 97.7%, respectively, following protocol 1 and 100% and 100%, respectively, following protocol 2, in comparison with broth microdilution. All results were obtained within 4.5 hours corresponding to a time saving of ca. 14 hours compared with currently available methods for AZA susceptibility testing. The Rapid Aztreonam/Avibactam NP test is rapid, highly sensitive, specific, easily interpretable, and easy to implement in routine.

Rapid meropenem/vaborbactam NP test for detecting susceptibility/resistance in Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

The treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are extremely scarce nowadays and the development of new antibiotics does not follow the exponential increase in the dissemination of carbapenem resistance determinants worldwide. Meropenem/vaborbactam was recently approved for clinical use and it has been indicated for treating several infections. Although relatively rare, meropenem/vaborbactam resistance has already been reported in Enterobacterales and its early detection could be a valuable tool for faster clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a rapid test, namely the Rapid MEV NP, for the identification of meropenem/vaborbactam resistance in Enterobacterales.

METHODS

The Rapid MEV NP test is based on detection of glucose metabolization occurring upon bacterial growth in the presence of meropenem/vaborbactam at a concentration of 16/8 mg/L. Bacterial growth is detectable by a colour change of phenol red (from red to yellow) subsequent of the acidification of the medium upon bacterial growth. A total of 75 Enterobacterales isolates were randomly selected for evaluating the performance of the Rapid MEV NP test.

RESULTS

The test showed 97.2% sensitivity and 93.8% specificity when compared with the reference method. The results are obtained after 3 h of incubation at 35°C ± 2°C, which is a gain of time of at least 15 h (one day in practice) compared with currently used antimicrobial susceptibility testing including broth microdilution methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rapid MEV NP test, easy to perform and to interpret, showed remarkable performance while providing fast results, and is therefore suitable for implementation in routine clinical microbiology laboratories.