Rare loss-of-function variants in FLNB cause non-syndromic orofacial clefts

Identification of rare variants in PTCH2 associated with non-syndromic orofacial clefts

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) represent the most prevalent congenital craniofacial anomalies, significantly impacting patients' appearance, oral function, and psychological well-being. Among these, non-syndromic OFCs (NSOFCs) are the most predominant type, with the etiology attributed to a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Rare variants of key genes involved in craniofacial development-related signaling pathway are crucial in the occurrence of NSOFCs, and our recent studies have identified PTCH1, a receptor-coding gene in the Hedgehog signaling pathway, as a causative gene for NSOFCs. However, the role of PTCH2, the paralog of PTCH1, in pathogenesis of NSOFCs remains unclear. Here, we perform whole-exome sequencing to explore the genetic basis of 144 sporadic NSOFC patients. We identify five heterozygous variants of PTCH2 in four patients: p.L104P, p.A131G, p.R557H, p.I927S, and p.V978D, with the latter two co-occurring in a single patient. These variants, all proven to be rare through multiple genomic databases, with p.I927S and p.V978D being novel variants and previously unreported. Sequence alignment suggests that these affected amino acids are evolutionarily conserved across vertebrates. Utilizing predictive structural modeling tools such as AlphaFold and SWISS-MODEL, we propose that these variants may disrupt the protein's structure and function. In summary, our findings suggest that PTCH2 may be a novel candidate gene predicted to be associated with NSOFCs, thereby broadening the spectrum of causative genes implicated in the craniofacial anomalies.

The heterogeneous genetic architectures of orofacial clefts

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common, affecting 1:1000 live births. OFCs occur across a phenotypic spectrum - including cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and palate (CLP), or cleft palate (CP) - and can be further subdivided based on laterality, severity, or specific structures affected. Herein we review what is known about the genetic architecture underlying each of these subtypes, considering both shared and subtype-specific risks. While there are more known genetic similarities between CL and CLP than CP, recent research supports both shared and subtype-specific genetic risk factors within and between phenotypic classifications of OFCs. Larger sample sizes and deeper phenotyping data will be of increasing importance for the discovery of novel genetic risk factors for OFCs and various subtypes going forward.