Cognitive effects of androgen deprivation therapy in an older cohort of men with prostate cancer

Cognitive functioning in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Prior research examining the impact of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer on cognitive performance has found inconsistent relationships. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the existing literature and determine the effect of ADT on performance across seven cognitive domains using meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search of PubMed Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge/Science databases yielded 157 unique abstracts reviewed by independent pairs of raters. Fourteen studies with a total of 417 patients treated with ADT were included in the meta-analysis. Objective neuropsychological tests were categorized into seven cognitive domains: attention/working memory, executive functioning, language, verbal memory, visual memory, visuomotor ability, and visuospatial ability.

RESULTS

Separate effect sizes were calculated for each cognitive domain using pairwise comparisons of patients who received ADT with (1) prostate cancer patient controls, (2) noncancer controls, or (3) ADT patients' own pre-ADT baselines. Patients treated with ADT performed worse than controls or their own baseline on visuomotor tasks (g = -0.67, p = .008; n = 193). The magnitude of the deficits was larger in studies with a shorter time to follow-up (p = .04). No significant effect sizes were observed for the other six cognitive domains (p = .08-.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate cancer patients who received ADT performed significantly worse on visuomotor tasks compared to noncancer control groups. These findings are consistent with the known effects of testosterone on cognitive functioning in healthy men. Knowledge of the cognitive effects of ADT may help patients and providers better understand the impact of ADT on quality of life.

Cognitive dysfunction and cancer: which consequences in terms of disease management?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to stress the importance of cognitive dysfunction in cancer survivors, and to discuss the way of assessing and managing these troubles in clinical practice.

METHOD

Original studies and reviews reporting the effect of cancer and chemotherapy on cognition and published since January 2000 were selected from the Medline(®) database using 'cognition' or 'cognitive function' and 'cancer' as subject headings.

RESULTS

Main reports concerned women with advanced breast cancer or children with hematological or brain cancers. Overall, chemotherapy was found to be associated with subtle and transient cognitive dysfunctions, which were detectable only with neuropsychological testing and affected most particularly memory, concentration and speed of information processing. Some factors associated with the patient, like depression, may favor cognitive impairment, while the role of others, like age or educational level, remains to be defined. Screening of patients at risk remains limited due to the lack of standardized neuropsychological tests in clinical oncology practice. Few studies have addressed the benefits of interventional strategies but methylphenidate, modafinil and erythropoietin, as well as rehabilitation in children, have shown encouraging results. Formal studies assessing the value of a multidisciplinary approach to detect and manage cognitive impairment must be recommended.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive dysfunction induced by cancer or the treatment represents a real challenge in clinical practice. Based on limited published data, few clinical recommendations can be made regarding prevention, evaluation and management of this trouble. Longitudinal studies must be conducted to evaluate its real impact on quality of life.