Surgical treatment of elderly patients with endometrial cancer (≥65years)

Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of endometrial cancer cases in Puerto Rico during the period 2009 to 2015: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, the rising incidence rates of endometrial cancer have made it a significant public health concern for women worldwide. Treatment strategies for endometrial cancer vary based on several factors such as stage, histology, the patient's overall health, and preferences. However, limited amount of research on treatment patterns and potential correlations with sociodemographic characteristics among Hispanics is available. This study analyzes the treatment patterns for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in Puerto Rico.

METHODS

A secondary database analysis was performed on endometrial cancer cases reported to the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database from 2009 to 2015 (n = 2,488). The study population's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were described, along with an overview of the therapy options provided to patients receiving care on the island. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of sociodemographic/clinical characteristics with treatment patterns stratified by risk of recurrence.

RESULTS

In our cohort, most patients were insured through Medicaid and had a median age of 60 years. Almost 90% of patients received surgery as the first course of treatment. Surgery alone was the most common treatment for low-risk patients (80.2%). High-risk patients were more likely to receive surgery with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (24.4%). Patients with Medicare insurance were five times (HR: 4.84; 95% CI: 2.45-9.58; p < 0.001) more likely to receive surgery when compared with patients insured with Medicaid. In contrast, those with private insurance were twice as likely to receive surgery (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.40-4.04; p = 0.001) when compared to those with Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide insight into the treatment patterns for endometrial cancer in Puerto Rico and highlight the importance of considering factors such as disease risk when making treatment decisions. Addressing these gaps in treatment patterns can contribute to effective management of endometrial cancer.

Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

Geriatric patients requiring gynecological surgery is increasing worldwide. However, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiopulmonary complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a minimally invasive method for reducing postoperative morbidities. We compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries in patients older than 55 years.

METHODS

We included patients aged >55 years who underwent gynecological surgery at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2020, excluding vaginal or ovarian cancer surgeries were excluded. Surgical outcomes were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, with age cutoff was set at 65 years for optimal discriminative power. We performed linear or logistic regression analyses to compare the surgical outcomes according to age and operation type.

RESULTS

Among 2,983 patients, 28.6% underwent open surgery and 71.4% underwent laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were better than those of open surgery in all groups. In both the open and laparoscopic surgery groups, the older patients showed worse overall surgical outcomes. However, age-related differences in perioperative outcomes were less severe in the laparoscopic group. In the linear regression analysis, the differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion, and hospital stay between the age groups were smaller in the laparoscopy group. Similar restuls were observed in cancer-only and benign-only cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Although the surgical outcomes were worse in the older patients, the difference between age groups was smaller for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery offers more advantages and safety in patients aged >65 years.

Surgical Treatment Outcomes of Gynecologic Cancer in Older Patients: A Retrospective Study

This study aimed to evaluate oncologic characteristics and surgical outcomes in older patients with gynecologic cancers. This retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 years who were diagnosed with gynecologic cancers and underwent surgical treatment between 2005 and 2020. We reviewed the medical records for age at diagnosis, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, postoperative complications, cancer stage, histologic type, surgical treatment, postoperative outcome, and survival rate. Data were compared between groups according to the age at the time of diagnosis: <75 years (young-old) and ≥75 years (old-old). In total, 131 patients were identified: 53 (40.5%) with ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer (OC), 44 (33.6%) with endometrial cancer (EC), 30 (22.9%) with cervical cancer, and 4 (3.1%) with leiomyosarcoma. The patients' mean age was 70 (range, 65-83) years; 106 (80.9%) were young-old and 25 (19.1%) were old-old. Postoperative complications occurred in 19 (14.5%) patients. Four patients died within six months after surgery, and three died because of disease progression. There was no difference in the survival rates between the two groups among those with OC and EC. Older patients with gynecologic cancers showed good surgical outcomes and tolerable postoperative complications. Therefore, we can safely offer surgical treatment to older patients.

Surgical treatment in older patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Older patients (OP) diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) are less likely to receive an optimal surgical treatment compared with non-older patients (NOP). This undertreatment along with the presence of more aggressive tumours at diagnosis can explain the worse prognosis of EC in OP. There is limited evidence comparing perioperative outcomes between OP and NOP, and the benefit of applying complex procedures to OP is still controversial. The primary objective of the study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications between NOP and OP with EC that underwent primary surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare surgical management and survival rates.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-centre observational study including women undergoing surgery for EC between 2010 and 2019. Patients were classified according to age as NOP (younger than 75 years) or OP (75 years or older). Basal characteristics and surgical outcomes of groups were compared using Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, student T-tests or Mann Whitney tests. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival.

RESULTS

In total 281 patients underwent primary surgery for EC between 2010 and 2019 in our centre. At diagnosis, 184 patients were younger than 75 years while 97 were 75 and older. No differences were found in disease characteristics. Most of our patients (83,3%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Pelvic (58,2% vs. 37,1%, p = 0,001) and para-aortic (46,7% vs. 23,7%, p < 0,001) lymphadenectomies were performed more frequently in NOP compared with OP. Rates of intra-operative (6,5% vs. 12,4%, p = 0,116) and post-operative (13,0% vs. 20,6%, p = 0,120) complications were not statistically different between NOP and OP, and neither was the rate of severe complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification (5,4% vs. 8,2% of complications grade III-V respectively, p = 0,387). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate tended to be lower in the OP than in the NOP (74,8% vs. 82,5%, p = 0,071). Considering only patients in whom complete surgical staging was performed, OP presented similar DSS to NOP, with comparable complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

OP do not present a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications compared to NOP. However, they underwent fewer lymphadenectomies and tended to present poorer DSS. Further studies are needed to standardize the surgical management of these patients.

Oncologic outcomes in older women with endometrial carcinoma (≥70 years)

Data are limited in the management of elderly women with endometrial cancer as they are under-represented in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of women ≥70 years who underwent hysterectomy. One hundred and twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age among the cohort was 75 years (range: 70-91), and 52% underwent robotic surgery. The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 67%. The five-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 19%. Based on univariate analysis, white race, lower ASA score, higher pre-operative and post-operative haematocrit, lower estimated blood loss, stage I and robotic surgery were associated with improved OS. On multivariable analysis, ASA score, preoperative haematocrit, estimated blood loss and stage were associated with survival.Survival rates among older women were low and disease recurrence was high. Robotic surgery was safe and appeared to improve perioperative outcomes in older women with endometrial cancer.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecologic cancer with an overall survival above 90%. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. With an ageing population, an increased incidence of endometrial cancer is also expected. Increased frailty and comorbid conditions may prevent this population from undergoing surgery; consequently, these patients are often undertreated for a potentially curable disease.What do the results of this study add? Older women with endometrial cancer have low survival rates and high disease recurrence rates. Elderly women can tolerate robotic surgery to reduce the risk of adverse events.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is important to develop best practices to optimise patients for minimally invasive surgery. The benefits of robotic surgery may encourage patients and surgeons to partake in this approach. A multidisciplinary approach with geriatric evaluation may improve post-operative care and survival. Future clinical trials should include elderly women.

Construction and validation of a prognostic model for stage IIIC endometrial cancer patients after surgery

BACKGROUND

To explore the most predictive lymph node (LN) scheme for stage IIIC endometrial cancer (EC) patients after hysterectomy and develop a scheme-based nomogram.

METHODS

Data from 2626 stage IIIC EC patients, diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. The predictive ability of four LN schemes was assessed using C-index and Akaike information criterion (AIC). A nomogram based on the most predictive LN scheme was constructed and validated. The comparison of the predictive ability between nomogram and FIGO stage was conducted using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

FIGO stage (stage IIIC1/stage IIIC2) was not an independent risk factor for OS in stage IIIC EC patients (P = 0.672) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) had the best predictive ability (C-index: 0.742; AIC: 8228.95). A nomogram based on LODDS was constructed and validated, which had a decent C-index of 0.742 (0.723-0.762). The nomogram showed a better predictive ability than that of the FIGO staging system.

CONCLUSION

FIGO IIIC1/FIGO IIIC2 could not differentiate the prognosis for stage IIIC EC patients. We developed and validated a nomogram based on LODDS to predict OS for post-operative patients with stage IIIC EC.

Prognostic factors of endometrial cancer in elderly patient group and their effects on survival

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors of the elderly group and their effects on survival by examining the histopathological features, surgical treatment protocols, and treatment modalities of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS:

The records of 397 EC patients who completed their treatment and follow-up at a single center between 2012 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in two groups as <70 years old (n: 301; 75.8%) and >70 years old (n: 96; 24.2%). Following the evaluation of histopathological features and treatment protocols, independent risk factors influencing survival were investigated with the Cox regression model.

RESULTS:

The incidence of non-endometrioid histology (16.3% vs. 32.3%, p: 0.001), high-grade tumors (50.5% vs. 69.8%; p: 0.001), and >50 myometrial invasion (19.6% vs. 36.5%, p: 0.003) in the >70 age group was more frequent than that in the <70 age group. The independent risk factors on overall survival in the >70 age group were determined as non-endometrioid histology (HR: 5.9; 95% CI: 1.4– 24.7) and lymph node metastasis (HR: 6.4; 95% CI:1.6–25.0). In the <70 age group, non-endometrioid histology (HR: 11.3; 95% CI: 4.0–32.0) was identified as the only independent risk factor affecting 5-year survival.

CONCLUSION:

EC, with non-endometrioid histology, which is observed at a higher rate in elderly patients despite equal surgery and adjuvant therapy, is the primary factor that affects survival.

Comparison of Different Lymph Node Staging Schemes for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Node-Positive Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Patients

Objective: To compare the prognostic predictive performance of six lymph node (LN) staging schemes: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N stage, number of retrieved lymph nodes (NRLN), number of positive lymph nodes (NPLN), number of negative lymph nodes (NNLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) among node-positive endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients. Methods: A total of 3,533 patients diagnosed with node-positive EEC between 2010 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed. We applied X-tile software to identify the optimal cutoff value for different staging schemes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the relationships between different LN schemes and survival outcomes [disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS)]. Moreover, Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell concordance index (C-index) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of each scheme in both continuous and categorical patterns. Results: N stage (N1/N2) was not an independent prognostic factor for node-positive EEC patients based on multivariate analysis (DSS: p = 0.235; OS: p = 0.145). Multivariate model incorporating LNR demonstrated the most superior goodness of fit regardless of continuous or categorical pattern. Regarding discrimination power of the models, LNR outperformed other models in categorical pattern (OS: C-index = 0.735; DSS: C-index = 0.737); however, LODDS obtained the highest C-index in continuous pattern (OS: 0.736; DSS: 0.739). Conclusions: N stage (N1/N2) was unable to differentiate the prognosis for node-positive EEC patients in our study. However, LNR and LODDS schemes seemed to have a better predictive performance for these patients than other number-based LN schemes whether in DSS or OS, which revealed that LNR and LODDS should be more helpful in prognosis assessment for node-positive EEC patients than AJCC N stage.

The impact of sentinel lymph node sampling versus traditional lymphadenectomy on the survival of patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the survival of patients with lymph node positive endometrial carcinoma by type of surgical lymph node assessment.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2015 with endometrial carcinoma and uterine confined disease and nodal metastases on final pathology who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or underwent systematic lymphadenectomy were selected. Overall survival was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log rank test. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1432 patients were identified: 1323 (92.4%) and 109 (7.6%) underwent systematic lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy only, respectively. The rate of adjuvant treatment was comparable between patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and systematic lymphadenectomy (83.5% vs 86.6%, p=0.39). However, patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy were less likely to receive chemotherapy alone (13.6% vs 36.6%, p<0.001) and more likely to receive radiation therapy alone (19.8% vs 5.4%, p<0.001) compared with patients who had systematic lymphadenectomy. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and systematic lymphadenectomy (p=0.27 from log rank test), and 3 year overall survival rates were 82.2% and 79.4%, respectively (p>0.05). After controlling for confounders, there was no difference in survival between the systematic lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy alone groups (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 1.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone was not associated with an adverse impact on survival in patients with lymph node positive endometrial cancer.

Outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping for patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the overall survival of patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 with pathological stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy and had at least one month of follow-up were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients who underwent SLNBx or systematic lymphadenectomy (LND) (defined as at least 20 lymph nodes removed) were selected. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 13,010 patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 9861 (75.8%) and 3149 (24.2%) patients had systematic LND and SLNBx, respectively. Patients who had LND were more likely to receive radiation therapy (27.4% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (13% vs 8.7%, p < 0.001) compared to those who had SLNBx. After controlling for patient age, race, insurance status, depth of myometrial invasion, tumor grade, tumor size, presence of lymph-vascular invasion and receipt of radiation therapy, the performance of SLNBx was not associated with worse survival (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.21). For high-intermediate risk patients (based on GOG-99 criteria) after controlling for confounders, performance of SLNBx was not associated with worse survival (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.44). For intermediate risk patients who did not receive external beam radiation therapy or chemotherapy after controlling for confounders, performance of SLNBx was not associated with worse survival (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.65).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNBx had no negative impact on the survival of patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who undergo hysterectomy.

Adjuvant treatment for patients with FIGO stage I uterine serous carcinoma confined to the endometrium

Objectives

The role of adjuvant treatment for early-stage uterine serous carcinoma is not defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of adjuvant treatment on survival of patients with tumors confined to the endometrium.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage I uterine serous carcinoma with no myometrial invasion between January 2004 and December 2015 who underwent hysterectomy with at least 10 lymph nodes removed were identified from the National Cancer Database. Adjuvant treatment patterns defined as receipt of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy within 6 months from surgery were investigated and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and compared with the log-rank test for patients with at least one month of follow-up. A Cox analysis was performed to control for confounders.

Results

A total of 1709 patients were identified; 833 (48.7%) did not receive adjuvant treatment, 348 (20.4%) received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 353 (20.7%) received chemotherapy only, and 175 (10.2%) received radiotherapy only. Five-year overall survival rates for patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (n=736) was 81.9%, compared with 91.3% for those who had chemoradiation (n=293), 85.1% for those who received radiotherapy only (n=143), and 91.0% for those who received chemotherapy only (n=298) (p<0.001). After controlling for age, insurance status, type of treatment facility, tumor size, co-morbidities, and history of another tumor, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42, 0.96), or chemoradiation (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35, 0.88) had better survival compared with those who did not receive any adjuvant treatment, while there was no benefit from radiotherapy alone (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53, 1.37). There was no survival difference between chemoradiation and chemotherapy only (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.65, 2.01).

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) is associated with a survival benefit for uterine serous carcinoma confined to the endometrium.

Radical hysterectomy is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of radical hysterectomy in the management of patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma.

MATERIALS

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, with stage II (based on the revised FIGO staging) endometrial carcinoma who had hysterectomy and regional lymph node surgery were identified in the National Cancer Database. Those who had radical or modified radical (RH), or total hysterectomy (TH) were selected. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 7552 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Rate of RH was 10.5%. Those who underwent RH had longer hospital stay (median 3 vs 2 days, p < 0.001) and a higher 90-day (1.6% vs 0.8%, p = 0.05) mortality. There was no difference in OS between patients who had RH (n = 712) and SH (n = 5955) (p = 0.62); 5-year survival rates were 77.4% and 76.9%, respectively. After controlling for patient age (<65, ≥65 years), race (white, black, other/unknown), insurance status, presence of comorbidities, tumor size (<5, ≥5 cm, unknown), histology (endometrioid, non-endometrioid), performance of adequate lymphadenectomy, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, performance of radical hysterectomy was not associated with better survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Radical hysterectomy was not associated with a survival benefit in a cohort of patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma.

Short-term surgical complications after radical hysterectomy-A nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Centralization has, among other aspects, been argued to have an impact on quality of care in terms of surgical morbidity. Next, monitoring quality of care is essential in identifying areas of improvement. This nationwide cohort study was conducted to determine the rate of short-term surgical complications and to evaluate its possible predictors in women with early-stage cervical cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Women diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer, 2009 FIGO stages IB1 and IIA1, between 2015 and 2017 who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1 of the 9 specialized medical centers in the Netherlands, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Women were excluded if primary treatment consisted of hysterectomy without parametrial dissection or radical trachelectomy. Women in whom radical hysterectomy was aborted during the procedure, were also excluded. Occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications and type of complications, developing within 30 days after surgery, were prospectively registered. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of surgical complications.

RESULTS

A total of 472 women were selected, of whom 166 (35%) developed surgical complications within 30 days after radical hysterectomy. The most frequent complications were urinary retention with catheterization in 73 women (15%) and excessive perioperative blood loss >1000 mL in 50 women (11%). Open surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.42; 95% CI 1.73-6.76), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.45-6.79), vascular disease (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.07-3.38), and medical center (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.18-6.77) emerged as independent predictors of the occurrence of complications. Body mass index (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-1.00) was found as a negative predictor of urinary retention. Open surgery (OR 36.65; 95% CI 7.10-189.12) and body mass index (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.08-1.22) were found to be independent predictors of excessive perioperative blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term surgical complications developed in 35% of the women after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the Netherlands, a nation with centralized surgical care. Comorbidities predict surgical complications, and open surgery is associated with excessive perioperative blood loss.

Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

A minimally invasive surgical approach has proven to decrease peri- and postoperative complications and shorten duration of hospital stay; however, there are limited data evaluating the safety of robotic-assisted surgery and early hospital discharge in the elderly population. Because age is a well-known, independent risk factor for perioperative morbidity and gynecologists treat many elderly patients, this is an important area of study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate discharge timing and surgical outcomes in elderly compared with younger patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery at a high-volume, single institution from January 2013 through May 2016. Demographic information, discharge timing, and peri- and postoperative outcomes were compared for patients <65 years with those ≥65 years using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There were 2757 patients included, with 2521 <65 years and 236 ≥65 years. Median age of the younger group was 42 years, while the median age of the elderly group was 69 years. Elderly patients had a higher body mass index (kilograms per square meter) (28 vs 26, P < .001) and higher American Society of Anesthesia classification (P < .001). Elderly were more likely to have malignancy as the indication for surgery (68% vs 11%, P < .001) and to undergo hysterectomy (81% vs 38%, P < .001) or surgery with lymph node dissection (44.5% vs 7.1%, P < .001). Elderly patients had a higher incidence of intraoperative complications (9% vs 4.6%, P = .002) and longer median hospital stay (17 vs 7 hours, P < .001) compared with younger patients. Same-day discharge was more common in younger patients (76% vs 45%, P < .001), and elderly patients were more likely to have admissions lasting >23 hours (13% vs 3%, P < .001) on univariate and multivariate analysis. Analysis of postoperative outcomes included 2023 patients with available postoperative data (80% of total population) (1794 <65 years, 229 ≥ 65 years). There were no differences between elderly and younger patients in overall postoperative complications, reoperations, intensive care unit admissions, emergency room visits, or hospital readmission within 6 weeks of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Despite having more preoperative risk factors and more surgically complex procedures, elderly patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery had similar postoperative complication rates, and almost half of elderly patients were safely discharged the day of surgery. Our data suggest that robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge are safe in elderly patients.

Management of endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer in the elderly: current approach to a challenging condition

PURPOSE

Gynaecological cancer management in older people represents a current challenge. Therefore, in the present paper, we aimed to gather all the evidence reported in the literature concerning gynecological cancers in the elderly, illustrating the state of art and the future perspectives.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IBECS, BIOSIS, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Grey literature (Google Scholar; British Library) from January 1952 to May 2017, using the terms "ovarian cancer", "endometrial cancer", "cervical cancer", "gynecological cancers" combined with 'elderly', 'cancer', 'clinical trial' and 'geriatric assessment'.

RESULTS

The search identified 81 citations, of which 65 were potentially relevant after initial evaluation and met the criteria for inclusion and were analyzed. We divided all included studies into three different issue: "Endometrial cancer", "Ovarian cancer" and "Cervical cancer".

CONCLUSIONS

The present literature review shows that, in spite of the higher burden of comorbidities, elderly patients can also benefit from standard treatment to manage their gynecological cancers. It is important to overcome the common habit of undertreating the elderly patients because they are more fragile and with a lower life expectancy than their younger counterpart. Further trials with elderly women are warranted.

Age Is Not a Limiting Factor in Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) for Patients with Localized Cancer

This review examines the role of interventional radiotherapy (IRT otherwise known as brachytherapy) in cancer treatment for elderly patients. Despite their advanced age and associated comorbidities, elderly patients should receive definitive cancer therapies, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT). In fact, RT becomes first-line option for patients who are not eligible for surgery (due to comorbidities, anticoagulant drugs, and risk of disfigurement) or those who refuse it. It emerged from this review of the literature as effective, simple, safe, and comfortable and was associated with good local control, low toxicity rates, and excellent cosmesis and provided a cost benefit. IRT may be used as sole treatment for small cancers or as a useful adjunct to surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in more advanced (or lymph node positive) cases, especially when the aim is local control with adequate preservation of normal tissue function. As palliative treatment, IRT preserves quality of life and/or improves survival. It is to be hoped that this review will serve as a helpful guide for members of multidisciplinary teams that are involved in treating elderly patients with cancer.

Definitive Radiation Therapy for Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer: An Observational Study of Nonoperative Management

OBJECTIVE

There is limited evidence to inform the management of patients with endometrial cancer who are not candidates for hysterectomy, and treatment alternatives have not been compared directly in randomized trials. We analyzed the prognostic factors and outcomes for patients with stage I or II endometrial adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results public database.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of patients with stage I-II endometrial adenocarcinoma who were managed without hysterectomy and who were diagnosed during 1989 to 2010. Patients with prior primary tumors were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed to test associations between patient characteristics, radiotherapy modality, and overall and endometrial cancer-specific survival. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of radiation therapy (RT) type on survival outcomes after adjusting for other factors.

RESULTS

Among the 997 women included in the analyses, 605 received no RT (60.7%), 207 (20.8%) received external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 185 (18.6%) received brachytherapy, either alone or in combination with EBRT. After adjusting for other tumor and demographic factors, RT type was not associated with overall or endometrial cancer-specific survival. Significant predictors of survival included: tumor stage and grade, age at diagnosis, and marital status.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients in this population-based cohort with early-stage endometrial cancer managed without hysterectomy, the delivery of brachytherapy was not associated with improved survival, compared with EBRT alone. It seems worthwhile to pursue future clinical trials to evaluate definitive EBRT-alone strategies, omitting brachytherapy, for selected patients with medically inoperable endometrial cancer.

Treatment of Older Women With Endometrial Cancer: Improving Outcomes With Personalized Care

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and with a median age of 62 at diagnosis, it affects a significant number of older women. With increasing age and obesity rates in the world's population, there is an anticipated concomitant increase in older women with endometrial cancer. Older women are more likely to die of endometrial cancer compared with younger patients. Reasons for this include more aggressive tumor biology, less favorable clinicopathologic features, and more advanced disease. Other factors, however, such as reluctance to offer surgical treatment to the older patient and increased complications of treatment are likely to be important. Management of endometrial cancer requires multidisciplinary care (surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy). For each treatment, the feasibility (related to technical aspect of the procedure/treatment), side effects and safety (related to older-patient factors), and the overall benefit as it pertains to older women with endometrial cancer should be assessed carefully with a multidisciplinary approach. Despite the importance of these issues, the data are limited to answer these issues with clarity. In this article, we will review each treatment modality for older women with endometrial cancer. We will introduce the components of comprehensive geriatric assessment and their practical implication for older women with cancer in general and older women with endometrial cancer specifically.

Lack of improvement in survival rates for women under 50 with endometrial cancer, 2000-2011

PURPOSE

To assess how first course of treatment affects cancer-specific survival in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer younger than 50 years old.

METHODS

Public-use data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were used. The study included 82,721 women diagnosed with primary, invasive endometrial cancer between 2000 and 2011. We assessed type of treatment using Cox's proportional hazards models to determine survival disparity by age and stage.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific survival significantly improved for those aged ≥50 years with late stage, but did not improve for those <50. First course of treatment significantly affected cancer-specific survival for endometrial cancer patients. Regardless of age, survival was greatly improved for late-stage patients who received a combination of surgery and radiation [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.78] and 0.64 (95 % CI 0.59-0.68)] compared to those who received total hysterectomy with removal of ovaries and tubes. However, the proportion of patients who received combination therapy decreased over time. The magnitude of decrease was larger in patients <50 than in those aged ≥50. Overall, about 24-57 % of the difference in cancer-specific survival over time in patients aged <50 was explained by their initial treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in cancer-specific survival was only seen in older women with late-stage diagnosis. Despite improvements in diagnoses and treatments, the difference in age-specific survival indicates that more should be done to understand why these rates are not improving for those younger than 50 years old.