Association between frailty and readmission within one year after gastrectomy in older patients with gastric cancer

Risk factors for preoperative frailty in older patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To summarize the available evidence on risk factors for preoperative frailty in older gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for preoperative articles on risk factors for frailty in older gastric cancer patients. The search was conducted from the time of construction of the library to January 27, 2024, with no language restrictions. The quality of the included studies was rated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included, including 16 cohort studies and 4 cross-sectional studies, with a total sample size of 51,717 individuals. The results of the meta-analysis showed that age, albumin, hemoglobin, cancer stage III-IV, Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score > 2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, smoking, nutritional risk, high school degree or above, and sleep disorders are the main influencing factors for the occurrence of preoperative frailty in older gastric cancer patients. Among them, high school degree or above was a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides valid evidence of risk factors for preoperative frailty in older patients with gastric cancer and informs clinical healthcare professionals to make targeted interventions.

Comorbidity assessment methods and their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer - A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The scoping review was performed to identify methods of comorbidity assessment and to evaluate their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and European Trials Register were searched for eligible studies investigating the impact of comorbidity on various postoperative outcomes of patients aged ≥65. Findings were narratively reported.

RESULTS

The review identified 40 studies with a total population of 59,612 patients, using eight different methods of comorbidity assessment. The most used was Charlson Comorbidity Index (60 % of studies) and presence of specific comorbid conditions (38 %). No study provided rationale for the choice of specific comorbidity measure. Most of the included studies reported short-term results (75 %), such as postoperative complications (43 %) and mortality (18 %) as main clinical endpoint. The results were inconsistent across the studies.

DISCUSSION

There is still no consensus regarding the choice of comorbidity measures and their role in postoperative outcome prediction. Further efforts are needed to develop new, well-designed, more effective comorbidity assessments tools.

How can we approach preoperative frailty and related factors in patients with cancer? A scoping review

AIM

To identify factors related to preoperative frailty in patients with cancer and map the tools that measure frailty.

DESIGN

A Scoping review.

METHODS

This scoping review based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Articles from CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases published between January 2011 and April 2021. The searched keywords were concepts related to 'cancer', 'frailty' and 'measurement'.

RESULTS

While 728 records were initially identified, 24 studies were eventually selected. Research on frailty was actively conducted between 2020 and 2021. Factors related to preoperative frailty were age (22.9%), sex (11.4%), body mass index (11.4%) and physical status indicators (54.3%). The most common result of preoperative frailty was postoperative complications (35.0%). 24 instruments were used to measure frailty.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Selecting an appropriate preoperative frailty screening tool can help improve patient postoperative treatment outcomes.

IMPACT

There are many instruments for assessing preoperative frailty, each evaluating a multi-dimensional feature. We identified the frailty screening tools used today, organized the factors that affect frailty, and explored the impact of frailty. Identifying and organizing frailty measurement tools will enable appropriate evaluation.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA-ScR.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

The use of frailty questionnaires in inpatients in two neurorehabilitation units in the East Midlands - A cross-sectional cohort study with follow-up to 1-year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Frailty correlates with poor clinical outcomes and is not routinely assessed in neurorehabilitation inpatient settings.

METHODS

We recruited adults from two neurorehabilitation units. We administered six validated tools for assessing frailty and collected data around length of stay, discharge, readmission and change in rehabilitation outcome measures.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight participants aged between 31 and 84 years were recruited with a range of neurological diagnoses. Frailty prevalence ranged between 23% and 46%, depending on the scale used, with little agreement between tools. Frailty status did not correlate with age, gender, length of stay, discharge destination and rehabilitation outcome measures. One-year readmission was higher in participants rated as frail by the Frail-Non-Disabled Questionnaire, the FRESH-screening questionnaire and the Clinical Frailty Scale.

DISCUSSION

Frailty ascertainment was variable depending on the tool used. Three frailty indices predicted readmission rate at 1 year but no other outcome measures. Therefore, frailty tools may have limited utility in this clinical population.

Relation between frailty and adverse outcomes in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a scoping review

Background

Playing an exemplary role, frailty have crucial effect on the preoperative evaluation of elderly patients. Previous studies have shown that frailty is associated with complications and mortality in patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, with the development of the concept of "patient-centered", the range of health-related outcomes is broad. The differences in relation between frailty and various adverse outcomes will be further explored.

Method

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases were searched for keywords, including frailty (such as frail) and gastric cancer (such as stomach neoplasms or stomach cancer or gastrectomy or gastric surgery). The search period is until August 2023. The included studies were observational or cohort studies with postoperative related adverse outcomes as primary or secondary outcome measures. Valid assessment tools were used. The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies was used to assess methodological quality in the included literature.

Result

Fifteen studies were included, including 4 cross-sectional studies, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 prospective cohort studies. Among them, 6 studies were rated as "Good" and 9 studies were rated as "Fair," indicating that the quality of the literature was high. Then, 10 frailty assessment tools were summarized and classified into two broad categories in accordance with frailty models. Results of the included studies indicated that frailty in elderly patients with GC was associated with postoperative complications, mortality, hospital days, readmissions, quality of life, non-home discharge, and admission to the intensive care unit.

Conclusion

This scoping review concludes that high levels of preoperative frailty increase the risk of adverse outcomes in elderly patients with GC. Frailty will be widely used in the future clinical evaluation of elderly gastric cancer patients, precise risk stratification should be implemented for patients, and frailty management should be implemented well to reduce the occurrence of adverse treatment outcomes.

Prevalence and unfavorable outcome of frailty in older adults with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Previous studies reported inconsistent results on the prevalence and prognostic implications of frailty among older adults with gastric cancer. This systematic review synthesized available literature pertaining on this topic to establish the prevalence and unfavorable outcomes of frailty in older adults with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple English databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science as well as Chinese databases, namely, CNKI, Wan Fang, and CBM, from inception to July 4, 2023, to identify potential studies. Data related to the incidence of frailty and its unfavorable outcomes in older adults with gastric cancer were extracted. RevMan5.3 and R 4.2.2 were used to evaluate pooled prevalence, hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

This review comprehensively selected 13 studies, comprising 9 cohort studies and 4 cross-sectional studies, on 44,117 older adults diagnosed with gastric cancer. The incidence of frailty among older adults with gastric cancer ranged from 10 to 71%. The pooled prevalence of frailty was 29% (95% CI 0.21-0.39). Frailty was found to be associated with an elevated risk of postoperative complications (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.45-2.73), prolonged postoperative hospital stay (HR = 2.68, 95% CI 2.38-3.02), likelihood of readmission (HR = 3.28, 95% CI 1.77-6.08), and an increased mortality risk (HR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was associated with a poor prognosis in older adults with gastric cancer. Clinical medical staff should focus on the frailty of older adults with gastric cancer, conduct large-scale, multicenter, and prospective studies and early screening of patients, and provide guidance for the implementation of prevention and treatment strategies.

Efficiency, Safety, Quality, and Empathy: Balancing Competing Perioperative Challenges in the Elderly

Although baby boomer generation accounts for a little more than 15% of the US population, the cohort represents a disproportionate percentage of patients undergoing surgery. As this group continues to age, a multitude of challenges have arisen in health care regarding the safest and most effective means of providing anesthesia services to these patients. Many elderly patients may be exquisitely sensitive to the effects of anesthesia and surgery and may experience cognitive and physical decline before, during, or after hospital admission. In this review article, the authors briefly examine the physiologic processes underlying aging and explore steps necessary to deliver safe, empathetic care.

Preoperative low handgrip strength (HGS) with HGS asymmetry is associated with adverse outcomes among older adults with gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to explore the associations of low hand grip strength (HGS), HGS asymmetry, their combinations, and frailty on hospital readmissions, total complications, and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) among older adults with gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 342 patients with gastric cancer aged ≥60 years who were scheduled to undergo radical surgery. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) was used to collect information on frailty. HGS was measured twice for each hand using an electronic handgrip dynamometer. The highest HGS readings on each hand were used for calculating the HGS asymmetry ratio: non-dominant HGS (kg)/dominant HGS (kg). The Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazard model and the logistic regression model were used for the analyses, with covariates adjusted.

RESULTS

Low HGS (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR] = 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-3.93, P = 0.036) and low HGS with HGS asymmetry (SHR = 3.95, 95% CI = 1.50-10.36, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with hospital readmissions. Frailty was associated with total complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.61-5.13, P < 0.001) and PLOS (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.19-3.29, P < 0.001). Low HGS, HGS asymmetry, and their combinations were not significantly associated with total complications and PLOS.

DISCUSSION

Preoperative low HGS and low HGS with HGS asymmetry were associated with hospital readmissions, while frailty was associated with total complications and PLOS among older adults with gastric cancer. In the future, more rigorously designed studies are needed to verify our results further to improve preoperative clinical assessment and frailty evaluation among older adults with gastric cancer.

Impact of frailty on survival and readmission in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy: A meta-analysis

Background

Frailty as a common geriatric syndrome can affect the clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. However, the impact of frailty on survival and readmission patients with gastric cancer has not been well-characterised.

Objectives

To investigate the impact of frailty on survival and readmission in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy by conducting a meta-analysis.

Methods

Eligible studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until 2 September 2022. Observational studies that evaluated the value of frailty in predicting adverse outcomes in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy were included. The outcomes of interest were overall survival, disease-specific survival (death from gastric cancer), and readmission. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled to calculate the association of frailty with adverse outcomes.

Results

Eight studies reported on nine articles with 2,792 patients with gastric cancer were included. A fixed-effect meta-analysis indicated that frailty was associated with a reduced in-hospital overall survival (HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.46–2.95), long-term overall survival (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.37–2.47), and disease-specific survival (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.34–2.83). In addition, frailty was associated with increased risk of readmission within 1 year (HR 3.63; 95% CI 1.87–7.06).

Conclusions

Frailty was associated with a reduced overall survival and disease-specific survival and an increased risk of readmission in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy. Frail status may play an important role in the risk stratification of gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

Effects of body mass index and serum albumin on overall survival in patients with cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Objectives

We aimed to explore whether body mass index (BMI) and albumin were associated with overall survival (OS) in individuals who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for cancer.

Methods

Three-hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients who underwent PD for cancer were enrolled from January 2020 to December 2020. All clinicopathological information was extracted based on medical records. The survival follow-ups were regularly performed and ended on June 30, 2021. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the association of BMI and albumin with OS.

Results

Of the 329 patients, 186 (56.5%) were male, and median age at admission was 65.0 (56.0–71.0) years. There were 258 patients (78.4%) with BMI < 25.0 kg/m² and 89 patients (27.05%) with albumin < 35.0 g/L respectively. In overall cohort, BMI < 25.0 kg/m² was associated with OS (adjusted HR = 3.516, 95% CI = 1.076–11.492, P = 0.037). In contrast, albumin < 35.0 g/L did not affect OS. Subgroup analysis showed, in patients with pancreas lesion, BMI < 25.0 kg/m² had a higher risk for OS compared to BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m² (adjusted HR = 3.209, 95% CI = 0.985–10.451, P = 0.048), while albumin < 35.0 g/L was not linked to OS. In patients with lesion in ampulla of Vater, duodenum, or common bile duct, there was no significant association of BMI and albumin with OS.

Conclusions

BMI, rather than serum albumin, was associated with OS in patients who underwent PD for cancer.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02678-z.

Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative frailty in Chinese elderly inpatients with gastric and colorectal cancer undergoing surgery: a single-center cross-sectional study using the Groningen Frailty Indicator

BACKGROUND

Frailty is emerging as an important determinant for health. Compared with Western countries, research in the field of frailty started at a later stage in China and mainly focused on older community dwellers. Little is known about frailty in Chinese cancer patients, nor the risk factors of frailty. This study aimed at investigating the prevalence of frailty and its risk factors in elderly inpatients with gastric and colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in China from Mar. 2020 to Nov. 2020. The study enrolled 265 eligible inpatients aged 60 and older with gastric and colorectal cancer who underwent surgery. Demographic and clinical characteristics, biochemical laboratory parameters, and anthropometric data were collected from all patients. The Groningen Frailty Indicator was applied to assess the frailty status of patients. A multivariate logistic regression model analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of frailty and to estimate their 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The prevalence of frailty in elderly inpatients with gastric and colorectal cancer was 43.8%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (OR = 1.065, 95% CI: 1.001-1.132, P = 0.045), low handgrip strength (OR = 4.346, 95% CI: 1.739-10.863, P = 0.002), no regular exercise habit (OR = 3.228, 95% CI: 1.230-8.469, P = 0.017), and low MNA-SF score (OR = 11.090, 95% CI: 5.119-24.024, P < 0.001) were risk factors of frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested a relatively high prevalence of frailty among elderly inpatients with gastric and colorectal cancer. Older age, low handgrip strength, no regular exercise habit, and low MNA-SF score were identified as risk factors of frailty.

The type of gastrectomy and modified frailty index as useful predictive indicators for 1-year readmission due to nutritional difficulty in patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) are likely to have nutritional difficulty after surgery. Readmission due to nutritional difficulty is common in such patients. Thus, in this study, we aim to identify the predictive indicators for readmission due to nutritional difficulty in patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed surgical outcomes in 516 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC.

RESULTS

The readmission rate within 1 year was 13.8%. Readmission due to nutritional difficulty was observed in 20 patients (3.9%); it was determined as the second leading cause of readmission. Multivariate analysis revealed that the type of gastrectomy and the modified frailty index (mFI) were independent predictive indicators of readmission due to nutritional difficulty. Patients were assigned 1 point for each predictive indicator, and the total points were calculated (point 0, point 1, or point 2). The readmission rates due to nutritional difficulty were 1.2%, 4.7%, and 11.5% in patients with 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively (P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

The readmission rate due to nutritional difficulty was noted to be high in patients who underwent total or proximal partial gastrectomy with high mFI. Intensive follow-up and nutritional support are needed to reduce readmissions due to nutritional difficulty. Reduced readmission rates can improve patient quality of life and reduce medical costs.

Relationship between frailty and mortality after gastrectomy in older patients with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

Frail older adults with gastric cancer are at an increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes. We assessed whether geriatric frailty assessed using the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index could predict post-gastrectomy mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed older adults (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between April 2012 and September 2015. Frailty status was assessed using the SOF index (range, 0-3) and categorized as robust (0), pre-frail (1), and frail (2-3). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare survival between frailty groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify mortality-associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 231 patients (the median age 72.04 years and 140 (60.6%) men), 138 (59.7%) were robust, 58 (25.1%) were pre-frail, and 35 (15.2%) were frail. The mortality rate was 14.5% among robust patients, 20.7% among pre-frail patients, and 20.0% among frail patients (log-rank test, P = 0.032). Frail patients had more than a 3-fold increased risk of mortality compared with robust patients (adjusted HR = 3.331; 95% CI, 1.161-9.559). Multivariate analysis revealed that the SOF index and TNM stage were associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SOF index predicted post-gastrectomy mortality among older patients independently of age, sex, TNM stage, type of approach, gastrectomy type, and extent of lymph node dissection. SOF index may be used with ease to assess frailty status among older patients with gastric cancer in busy clinics and subgroups that may benefit from targeted frailty interventions before cancer treatments.

[Senior-friendly hospital: The hospital of the 21st century]

The current health system must be revolutionized to meet the specific and real requirements of the largest population attended, older adults, and tailor the hospital to their needs, not the other way round. This is the goal of Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor: senior-friendly hospital. The project was established as a business process management system integrated into the management's hospital map. Four subprocesses were defined, as were all activities and tasks to be performed. The subprocesses are health care (delirium and functional decline prevention and the identification of frail older patients), training, the environment and its structures, and patient and family involvement. The leadership corresponds to the geriatricians who coordinate a multidisciplinary team of the project's referents. Actions must be scientific, evidence-based, rigorous, and evaluable, and they should be audited. The final aim is to change established mentalities, routines, and habits to convert the hospital to a friendlier place for older adults.

Modified frailty index predicts complications and death after non-bariatric gastrectomies

Background

The modified frailty index (mFI) has been shown to predict mortality and morbidity after major operations. The aim of the present study was to assess the mFI as a preoperative predictor of short-term postoperative complications and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing gastrectomy for non-bariatric diseases.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent total or partial gastrectomy from 2005 to 2011. A mFI was calculated based on 11 variables as previously described. The population divided into the following four categories based on the mFI score: the non-frail (mFI 0), the low frail (mFI 1), the intermediate frail (mFI 2) and frail (mFI ≥3). Thirty-day mortality and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results

Overall, 5,711 patients underwent a gastrectomy for non-bariatric diseases. Higher mFI score was associated with higher rates of mortality (from 1.2% in the non-frail group to 10.7% in frail group, P<0.001), overall morbidity (26.7% vs. 51.1%, P<0.001), postoperative Clavien IV complication (6% vs. 24.6%, P<0.001), serious complications (19.3% vs. 42.6%, P<0.001), sepsis-related complications (8.4% vs. 16.4%, P<0.001), cardiopulmonary complications (5% vs. 20.7%, P<0.001) and failure to rescue (5.7% vs. 21.8%, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Higher mFI score in patients undergoing non-bariatric gastrectomy, is associated with a stepwise greater risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. MFI Score can be easily calculated preoperatively, from the patient's history, and it can be used as an exceptionally useful criterion for treatment planning.

Frailty assessment and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing general surgery

BACKGROUND

Frailty is an emerging concept in modern general surgery because of its correlation with adverse outcomes. More frail older patients are undergoing general surgery due to the rapid aging of the population and the effect of the "baby boom" generation. However, there is no consensus on the definition of frailty and on ways to assess its severity and effect.

PURPOSE

To describe the definition and epidemiology, measurement tools, and the effect of frailty on postoperative outcomes after general surgery.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar databases were comprehensively searched.

RESULTS

Frailty is a syndrome defined as increased vulnerability to stressors due to a decline in physiological function and reserve among organ systems, resulting in adverse outcomes. Numerous tools have been described and tested for frailty measurement, but the ideal clinical tool has not been found yet. The evidence from cohort studies and meta-analyses shows associations between preoperative frailty and adverse perioperative outcomes after general surgery.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is an essential concept in general surgery. However, further studies have to identify the optimal way to preoperatively assess frailty and risk-stratify older patients.

Extremely High Mortality Rate after a Successful Gastrectomy for Cancer in Older Adults

PURPOSE

Poor physiological reserve for withstanding major cancer surgery in older adults is an important concern in the selection of patients for oncologic gastrectomy. The present study aimed to analyze mortality patterns among patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer according to age groups. The primary outcomes of this study were early- and middle-term results: 30-day and 3-, 6-, 12-, and 36-month mortality rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 288 patients who underwent surgical resection for gastric cancer in two centers was carried out. Patients were stratified into four groups according to age: 29-50 years (group I, n=27), 51-65 years (group II, n=117), 66-75 years (group III, n=81), and 76-92 years (group IV, n=58). Statistical calculations focused on the differences in the survival rates between groups I and II as well as between groups II and IV.

RESULTS

The middle-aged patients (group II) had significantly better 3-year survival than either the youngest (group I) or the oldest patients (group IV). The 6-month mortality rates were 16.9% in group III and 29.3% in group IV. Two-thirds of the patients from groups III and IV who died between 2 and 6 months after surgery had an uneventful postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is an important prognostic factor of middle-term survival after gastrectomy for cancer. Geriatric assessment and better patient selection for major surgery for cancer are required to improve the outcome of gastrectomy for cancer in patients aged over 75 years.

Association of Frailty and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Outpatient Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Ambulatory surgery in geriatric populations is increasingly prevalent. Prior studies have demonstrated the association between frailty and readmissions in the inpatient setting. However, few data exist regarding the association between frailty and readmissions after outpatient procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between frailty and 30-day unplanned readmissions after elective outpatient surgical procedures as well as the potential mediation of surgical complications.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this retrospective cohort study of elective outpatient procedures from 2012 and 2013 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, 417 840 patients who underwent elective outpatient procedures were stratified into cohorts of individuals with a length of stay (LOS) of 0 days (LOS = 0) and those with a LOS of 1 or more days (LOS ≥ 1). Statistical analysis was performed from June 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019.

EXPOSURE

Frailty, as measured by the Risk Analysis Index.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission.

RESULTS

Of the 417 840 patients in this study, 59.2% were women and unplanned readmission occurred in 2.3% of the cohort overall (LOS = 0, 2.0%; LOS ≥ 1, 3.4%). Frail patients (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [15.5] years) were more likely than nonfrail patients (mean [SD] age, 35.0 [15.8] years) to have an unplanned readmission in both LOS cohorts (LOS = 0, 8.3% vs 1.9%; LOS ≥ 1, 8.5% vs 3.2%; P < .001). Frail patients were also more likely than nonfrail patients to experience complications in both cohorts (LOS = 0, 6.9% vs 2.5%; LOS ≥ 1, 9.8% vs 4.6%; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, frailty doubled the risk of unplanned readmission (LOS = 0: adjusted relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% CI, 2.0-2.3; LOS ≥ 1: adjusted RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.1). Complications occurred in 3.1% of the entire cohort, and frailty was associated with increased risk of complications (unadjusted RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.4-2.8). Mediation analysis confirmed that complications are a significant mediator in the association between frailty and readmissions; however, it also indicated that the association of frailty with readmission was only partially mediated by complications (LOS = 0, 22.8%; LOS ≥ 1, 29.3%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that frailty is a significant risk factor for unplanned readmission after elective outpatient surgery both independently and when partially mediated through increased complications. Screening for frailty might inform the development of interventions to decrease unplanned readmissions, including those for outpatient procedures.

Risk factors of the postoperative 30-day readmission of gastric cancer surgery after discharge: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Readmission is a common postoperative adverse event. This study aimed to analyze potential risk factors for the incidence of postoperative 30-day readmission after discharge for gastric cancer patients with surgical treatment.

METHODS

Those studies that reported the risk factors of gastric cancer patients who have a postoperative 30-day readmission were identified systematically from the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases through July 2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to estimate the risk factors of postoperative 30-day readmission after gastric cancer surgery.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 6 studies with 12,586 gastric cancer patients were included in the present study. There were 1473 (11.7%) patients who had postoperative 30-day readmission and 12,586 (88.3%) patients without 30-day postoperative readmission. A greater proportion of the readmission group had cardiovascular comorbidity (P < .001), pulmonary comorbidity (P < .001), and diabetes mellitus (P = .020) than the nonreadmission group. Furthermore, more patients in the readmission group had total gastrectomy (P < .001), combined organ resection (P < .001) and postoperative complications (P < .001) than did patients in the nonreadmission group. Nonhome discharge (odds ratio [OR] 1.580, P = .002), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.181, P = .044), postoperative complications (OR 2.656, P = .006), total gastrectomy (OR 2.242, P < .001), and combined organ resection (OR 1.534, P < .001) were independent risk factors for postoperative readmission.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative readmission is influenced by the synthetic action of preparative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, such as diabetes mellitus, total gastrectomy, combined organ resection, nonhome discharge, and postoperative complications. Extra attention should be paid to those patients with high risk factors during the postoperative follow-up and recovery periods.

Frailty in geriatric head and neck cancer: A contemporary review

OBJECTIVE

To provide a summary of the current frailty literature relating to head and neck cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed from 2000 to 2017 using key words frailty, elderly, geriatric, surgery, otolaryngology, head and neck cancer.

RESULTS

The aging population has led to an increased diagnosis of head and neck cancer in elderly patients. The prevalence of comorbidities, disabilities, geriatric syndromes and social issues can make treatment planning and management in this population challenging. Chronological age alone may not be the optimal approach to guiding treatment decisions, as there is marked heterogeneity amongst this age group. Individualization of treatment can be achieved by assessing for the presence of frailty, which has growing evidence as an important marker of health status in geriatric oncology. Frailty is a complex geriatric syndrome characterized by a state of increased vulnerability to stressors and is associated with morbidity, mortality, and treatment toxicity. Screening for frailty may provide an efficient method to identify those who would benefit from further assessment or pretreatment optimization, and to provide prognostic information to assist clinicians and patients in formulating the most ideal treatment plan for the elderly individual with head and neck cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty has emerged as an important concept in geriatric oncology, with wide significance in head and neck cancer. Incorporating frailty assessments into clinical practice may provide otolaryngologists pertinent information regarding health status and outcomes leading to optimal care of the elderly cancer patient. Laryngoscope, 128:E416-E424, 2018.

Frailty and quality of life among older people with and without a cancer diagnosis: Findings from TOPICS-MDS

Background

The number of older cancer patients is rising. Especially in older people, treatment considerations should balance the impact of disease and treatment on quality of life (QOL) and survival. How a cancer diagnosis in older people interacts with concomitant frailty to impact on QOL is largely unknown. We aimed to determine the association between frailty and QOL among community-dwelling older people aged 65 years or above with and without a cancer diagnosis cross-sectionally and at 12 months follow-up.

Methods

Data were derived from the TOPICS-MDS database. Frailty was quantified by a frailty index (FI). QOL was measured with the subjective Cantril’s Self Anchoring Ladder (CSAL, range: 0–10) and the health-related EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D, range:-0.33–1.00) at baseline and after 12 months. To determine associations, linear mixed models were used.

Results

7493 older people (78.6±6.4 years, 58.4% female) were included. Dealing with a cancer diagnosis (n = 751) was associated with worse QOL both at baseline (CSAL:-0.25 (95%-CI:-0.36;-0.14), EQ-5D:-0.03 (95%-CI:-0.05;-0.02)) and at follow-up (CSAL:-0.13 (95%-CI:-0.24;-0.02), EQ-5D:-0.02 (95%-CI:-0.03;-0.00)). A ten percent increase in frailty was also associated with a decrease in QOL at baseline (CSAL:-0.35 (95%-CI:-0.38;-0.32), EQ-5D:-0.12 (95%-CI:-0.12;-0.11)) and follow-up (CSAL:-0.27 (95%-CI:-0.30;-0.24), EQ-5D:-0.07 (95%-CI:-0.07;-0.06)). When mutually adjusting for frailty and a cancer diagnosis, associations between a cancer diagnosis and QOL only remained significant for CSAL at baseline (-0.14 (95%-CI:-0.25;-0.03)), whereas associations between frailty and QOL remained significant for all QOL outcomes at baseline and follow-up. No statistical interactions between cancer and frailty in their combined impact on QOL were found.

Conclusions

Cancer diagnosis and frailty were associated with worse health-related and self-perceived QOL both at baseline and at follow-up. Differences in QOL between older people with and without a cancer diagnosis were explained to a large extent by differences in frailty levels. This stresses the importance to take into account frailty in routine oncologic care.

Short- and long-term readmission rates after infrainguinal bypass in a safety net hospital are higher than expected

OBJECTIVE

Readmission rates are expected to have an increasing effect on both the hospital bottom line and physician reimbursements. Safety net hospitals may be most vulnerable. We examined readmissions at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year in a large safety net hospital to determine the magnitude and effect of short- and long-term readmission rates after lower extremity infrainguinal bypass in this setting.

METHODS

All nonemergent extremity infrainguinal bypass performed at a large safety net hospital between 2008 and 2016 were identified. Patient demographic, social, clinical, and procedural details were extracted from the electronic medical record. An analysis of patients readmitted at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year was completed to determine the details of the readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients undergoing extremity infrainguinal bypass were identified. The most frequent indication was tissue loss (57%), followed by claudication (25.6%), and rest pain (17.4%). Patient insurance carriers included Medicare (61.7%), Medicaid (25.4%), and private (13%). The distal target was the popliteal and tibial artery in 52.6% and 47.4% cases, respectively. The majority of bypasses used autologous vein (73.1%). In-hospital complications included pulmonary complications (4.3%), urinary tract infection (3.1%), acute renal failure (2%), graft occlusion (2%), myocardial infarction (1.7%), bleeding (1.4%), surgical wound complications (1.1%), and stroke (0.9%). The 30-day readmission rate was 30% with the most common reasons for readmission being surgical wound complications, nonsurgical foot/leg wounds, nonextremity infectious causes, cardiac ischemia, and congestive heart failure. The 90-day readmission rate was 49.4% and the most common reasons for readmission from 31 to 90 days were nonsurgical foot/leg wounds, graft complications, surgical wound complications, cardiac ischemia, and contralateral leg morbidity. The readmission rate within 1 year was 72.2%. Readmission causes from 91 days to 1 year included graft complications, contralateral leg morbidity, nonextremity infectious, nonsurgical foot/leg wounds, cardiac ischemia, and congestive heart failure. A tibial bypass target was associated with 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.69; P = .029) and 90-day (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14-2.74, P = .011) readmission. Nonprivate insurance (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.17-4.57, P = .016), and critical limb ischemia (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14-2.74; P = .035) were associated with 1-year readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Short- and long-term readmission rates in a safety net setting are high. The 30-day rates in this study are higher than historically reported. This data sets baseline rates for 90-day and 1-year readmission for future analyses. Although the majority of short-term readmissions are related to the index procedure, long-term readmission rates are more frequently related to systemic comorbidities. Targeted patient interventions aimed at preventing the most common reasons for readmission may improve readmission rates, particularly among patients with nonprivate insurance. However, other risk factors, such as tibial target, may not be modifiable and a higher readmission rate may need to be accepted in this population.